{"id":103083,"date":"2024-07-19T03:09:55","date_gmt":"2024-07-19T08:09:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103083"},"modified":"2024-07-19T03:10:57","modified_gmt":"2024-07-19T08:10:57","slug":"103083","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103083","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

NRA Trial Reveals Reformers Have More Work to Do<\/a><\/p>\n

When a slate of reform-minded candidates won election to the NRA’s board of directors earlier this year, there was genuine hope that it would make a turning point for the organization, which has seen both membership and revenue plummet over the past few years. But testimony delivered during this week’s civil trial in New York has revealed that the board’s old guard still holds at least some sway over the direction of the organization, and there is much more work to be done to get the NRA back on track.<\/p>\n

Take, for instance, the testimony of new NRA president Bob Barr, who was not the reformer’s pick to serve as the top elected official of the organization. While most of the reform-minded board members were cautiously optimistic that Barr would go along with the necessary changes to renew members’ confidence in the organization, Barr revealed that the NRA hasn’t even tried to collect the millions of dollars that Wayne LaPierre owes the group.<\/p>\n

\n

Bob Barr just said the NRA hasn’t determined whether it will actually try to collect the $4.4 million Wayne LaPierre owes pursuant to the jury verdict against him.<\/p>\n

“That does remain in question,” Barr said.<\/p>\n

\u2014 Erik Uebelacker (@Uebey) July 16, 2024<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

It wasn’t just the misspending on the part of top NRA officials like former executive vice president Wayne LaPierre that have caused many gun owners to let their memberships lapse or refuse to donate, it’s definitely a major factor. So why hasn’t the NRA tried to claw back the money the jury says is owed to the group? It’s not like they couldn’t use the cash.<\/p>\n

Barr made another revealing comment; this one about new EVP Doug Hamlin, who\u00a0was\u00a0the choice of reformers. As John Richardon of Only Guns and Money relayed, Trace reporter Will Van Sant quoted Barr calling Hamlin a “placeholder” during testimony.<\/p>\n

The National Rifle Association\u2019s new chief executive Doug Hamlin is a placeholder, according to the testimony of former NRA president Charles Cotton that points to fault lines in the gun group\u2019s leadership.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

In May, board members chose Hamlin, who led the NRA\u2019s publications arm, as Wayne LaPierre\u2019s replacement. Hamlin is allied to a small, self-described reform bloc at the group.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThe intent is to try to get, frankly, some high-powered person to take it over,\u201d testified Cotton, a LaPierre defender whom the reformers consider part of an old guard. Cotton made his remarks in a New York courtroom where the\u00a0final phase\u00a0of New York Attorney General Letitia James\u2019s lawsuit against the NRA is underway.\u00a0\u2014Will Van Sant<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

When I\u00a0spoke to Hamlin\u00a0on Bearing Arms’ Cam & Co a few weeks after his election, I asked him about whether\u00a0he\u00a0considered himself to essentially be a placeholder, or whether he planned on sticking around. Hamlin replied that he served at the pleasure of the board, but he certainly didn’t sound like someone who took the job on a short-term basis.<\/p>\n

Hamlin and Barr have both taken the stand in New York this week, and Hamlin was\u00a0far more willing\u00a0to criticize his predecessor for his misuse of NRA funds.<\/p>\n

The New York attorney general called each to the witness stand to show how their differences could hold the NRA back from making progress toward financial transparency \u2014 part of the state\u2019s broader goal of having a court-appointed monitor oversee the NRA and banning LaPierre from its leadership for life.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

For instance, Hamlin was more willing to criticize LaPierre\u2019s reign during his testimony.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMr. LaPierre breached the trust of the NRA and its members, correct?\u201d state attorney Monica Connell prodded.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cYes,\u201d Hamlin replied, adding that he agreed LaPierre\u2019s conduct placed the NRA in a \u201cvery difficult decision\u201d and was partly responsible for the group\u2019s declining membership.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Meanwhile, Barr maintained that LaPierre discharged his duties to the NRA in good faith, conceding that LaPierre may have made a few mistakes along the way. He took issue with the attorney general calling LaPierre \u201ccorrupt\u201d following the verdict against him in February.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cI believe it was, shall we say, a mischaracterization,\u201d Barr testified Wednesday.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Hamlin and Barr also appeared to be on different pages about the NRA\u2019s potential relocating of its headquarters, a move that Knox and other board members believe should only be done with significant input from the board.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Hamlin, who previously ran the NRA\u2019s in-house publishing arm, testified that he wasn\u2019t even aware of the NRA\u2019s intent to sell its Virginia headquarters until a few weeks ago. He axed plans to sell the Fairfax property when he took the NRA\u2019s reins earlier this year. Barr testified that he thought Hamlin\u2019s decision was \u201crushed.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Still, these disputes weren’t an issue for Barr, a former U.S. representative from Georgia, who told the court he could \u201cabsolutely\u201d work productively with Hamlin. \u201cIt\u2019s similar to working in the Congress,\u201d Barr said. \u201cYou have disagreements.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I’m not sure pointing to Congress as a model of efficiency and comity is a great example, to be honest.<\/p>\n

Beyond the trial, Barr has also appointed former NRA president Charles Cotton, who, as Van Sant points out, is considered one of the leaders of the old guard, to serve as chairman of several key BoD committees, including the Ethics and Audit committees. Not only that, as Richardson\u00a0pointed out, Barr named just one of the Four for Reform candidates to\u00a0any\u00a0of these key committees.<\/p>\n

I find this disappointing as their election is being used by the NRA in\u00a0its court filings to assert that things have changed\u00a0and no special monitor was needed. While Rocky\u2019s appointment is good and proper, why was not Jeff Knox put on Bylaws and Resolutions as he probably knows more about the Bylaws than any member of that committee. Likewise, would not it have been wise to put Judge Phil Journey, the only jurist on the Board, on the Legal Affairs Committee.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

With the exception of the Finance Committee which has has four known reformers on it (out of 15 total members), the remaining committees have one and perhaps two known reformers on them. If Barr wanted to signal to the members of the NRA and to Judge Cohen that things had changed at the NRA, this certainly was not the way to do it.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

While I don\u2019t have a crystal ball on what will happen in the remedial phase of the New York trial, I think the odds are better than even that a special monitor will now be appointed to oversee the NRA\u2019s finances. It should be noted that this monitor will have nothing to do with functions and programs of the NRA including its political functions. <\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

While this will put me at odds with some friends on the Board who are reformers, I think that the special monitor will be a requirement if the NRA is ever to crawl out of the morass it finds itself in.<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I said when Barr was elected that he wasn’t\u00a0my first choice, but I was hopeful that with reformers elected by the board to every other leadership position he would be a part of the effort to regain the trust of members. After the revelations over the past week, I can’t say I still harbor those hopes.<\/p>\n

And honestly, as much as I want to see the NRA succeed, why should any individual or company donate a penny in support so long as the NRA isn’t demanding the return of the millions of dollars LaPierre owes the organization and its dues-paying members? Barr wasn’t asked that question on the stand, but everyone who’s stood by the organization or felt it was time to return to the fold deserve an answer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

NRA Trial Reveals Reformers Have More Work to Do When a slate of reform-minded candidates won election to the NRA’s board of directors earlier this year, there was genuine hope that it would make a turning point for the organization, which has seen both membership and revenue plummet over the past few years. But testimony … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,10,23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-corruption","category-courts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=103083"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103084,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103083\/revisions\/103084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=103083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=103083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=103083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}