{"id":103832,"date":"2024-08-23T18:16:07","date_gmt":"2024-08-23T23:16:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103832"},"modified":"2024-08-23T18:16:07","modified_gmt":"2024-08-23T23:16:07","slug":"103832","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103832","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

The Misinformation Antidote: Protect Yourself, Your Country, and Your Planet<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The constant barrage of conflicting truths from various factions contributes to soaring levels of anxiety and depression. Enter “The Misinformation Antidote,” a groundbreaking book that unveils the solution to this pervasive problem.<\/p>\n

The book’s positive impact extends beyond its primary mission of combating misinformation. A beneficial side effect emerges\u2014an unveiling of a reality that is more captivating, positive, and diverse than commonly understood. Contrary to the gloomy narratives, the world isn’t as dire as portrayed. As misinformation is neutralized, people from diverse backgrounds can come together to solve previously deemed intractable problems. The antidote creates an environment where individuals prosper and lead enjoyable lives collectively.<\/p>\n

In essence, “The Misinformation Antidote” is more than just a book; it’s a guide to navigating the turbulent sea of information, offering a transformative experience that empowers individuals to reshape their perspectives. By embracing this antidote, readers not only fortify themselves against the harmful effects of misinformation but also discover a newfound appreciation for the richness and potential of the world around them. It’s a beacon of hope in a world often clouded by conflicting narratives and a roadmap towards a more informed, positive, and united future.<\/p>\n

Author Offers Unique Insights on Fascism, Second Amendment, and More<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cUnique Book Offers Antidote to 2A Misinformation,\u201d\u00a0my\u00a0Firearms News<\/em>\u00a0review<\/a>\u00a0of\u00a0The Misinformation Antidote<\/em>\u00a0notes. The book\u2019s author, \u201cOmniscient Narrator\u201d (that\u2019s a literary device found in works written as third-person narratives), has written a comprehensive analysis of the ways misinformation allows for public policy to serve the interests of those who require deception to wield power, covering not just Second Amendment matters. It\u2019s an eclectic work that exposes directed fallacies in the mass understanding of topics as diverse as fascism, evolution, scientific knowledge, and more.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m doing what I can to bring it to the attention of gun owners and other freedom lovers because I believe we could benefit from being able to recognize when we\u2019re being subjected to bad information, and because those spreading it certainly will never tell us about it. So, in addition to the review, I\u2019ve asked the author to share some of his thoughts with us in an exclusive AmmoLand interview.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

DC:<\/strong>\u00a0Why the pseudonym? What\u2019s the significance of \u201cOmniscient Narrator\u201d?<\/p>\n

\n
ON: <\/strong>My \u201creal\u201d job is with a very large publicly traded corporation and my wife works for a large bank, and we need to keep our jobs. Sadly, in today\u2019s environment, it\u2019s almost impossible to point out the realities I do and not be \u201ccancelled\u201d by your employer. I use \u201cOmniscient Narrator\u201d both because that defines objective, accurate, description of reality and because I thought it would make a good brand someday \u2013 \u201cON\u201d, or my handle on X.com\u00a0@ONomniscient<\/a>. It could be used for specific topics, like \u201cON: The New Deal\u201d, or \u201cON: The Boston Tea Party\u201d.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

DC:<\/strong>\u00a0Do you have any special educational or professional background? How did you come up with the insights you share in the book?<\/p>\n

ON<\/strong>: I have a couple of college degrees, including an MDA and some professional certifications. Mostly what qualifies me is 50 years of research into just about everything trying to find out the meaning of life, the universe, and everything (it\u2019s NOT 42). I use primary sources wherever possible and used to live in used bookstores. This way I found things like a book called\u00a0Men and Issues of \u201992<\/em>, of 1892, covering both Democrat and Republican positions on all the issues as well as bios of all the candidates (a book about 3 inches thick!).<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
DC:<\/strong>\u00a0A topic you covered in detail is one exploited to great effect by the political \u201cleft,\u201d when it describes it opponents as \u201cfascists.\u201d Could you share a quote or two from Benito Mussolini, so that we can compare what he advocated with the socialist\/Democrat platform?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

ON:\u00a0Fascism is the most dangerous and destructive \u201csystem\u201d ever developed. It is an actual system \u2013 of thought, of economics, of culture. It is NOT simply one dictator making all decisions.<\/p>\n

My grandfather served in North Africa fighting Rommel and after landing at Salerno, moved on to Rome. The most dangerous element of Fascism is that the initial positions and arguments sound beneficial and attractive, which people don\u2019t think through to their logical outcomes. Mussolini was a Socialist Party member, and invented Fascism after the Socialist Party kicked him out. As he was walking out the door, Mussolini said \u201cDo not imagine that by tearing up my membership card in the Socialist Party you can forbid my socialist faith or prevent me from continuing to work for the cause of socialism and the revolution\u201d<\/p>\n

The first Fascist Party platform published in 1919 included things like a law mandating an 8-hour workday, a heavy inheritance tax, a heavy tax on capital, management of industries by workers unions, and universal suffrage (women right to vote).<\/p>\n

Mussolini himself said:<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201cWe are fighting to impose a higher social justice. What does social justice mean? It means guaranteed work, decent homes, and the possibility of evolution and improvement.\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIf classical liberalism spells Individualism, Fascism spells Government\u201d<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Two books explaining Fascism, and endorsed by Mussolini, specifically explained:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe function of private enterprise is assessed from the standpoint of the public interest, and hence an owner or director of a business undertaking is responsible before the State\u2026.(Fausto Pitigliani,\u00a0The Corporative State<\/em>)<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cMore Important than the production of wealth is its right distribution, distribution which must benefit in the best possible way all the classes of the nation, hence the nation itself\u201d.<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

DC:<\/strong>\u00a0This wasn\u2019t covered in your book, but in your introduction letter to\u00a0Firearms News<\/em>, you argued the 1328 Statute of Northampton was critical to understanding \u2013 and successfully arguing \u2013 for the Second Amendment in court.\u00a0 What was it and why is it important?<\/p>\n

ON:<\/strong>\u00a0It\u2019s been given importance by so-called Constitutional experts and judges themselves, in error. It allegedly shows the \u201cprecedent\u201d for \u201cgovernment\u201d regulating the \u201cright\u201d to carry arms (weapons) and was addressed at length in the arguments in the\u00a0Bruen<\/em>\u00a0case decided June 2022.<\/p>\n

New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen<\/em>\u00a0concerned the states\u2019 \u201crestrictions\u201d on lawful citizens carrying firearms. It is cited and discussed as part of the false and deceitful allegation that the meaning of the 2nd amendment is not \u201cclear\u201d and that in \u201ctrying to understand\u201d what the drafters and ratifiers of the Constitution \u201cthought\u201d it meant, it is appropriate to look to English law because that is what they used prior to the Revolution.<\/p>\n

The first problem with this argument is that in 1328, English citizens had NO RIGHTS, except those that the King GAVE them. So, a prohibition of carrying weapons (firearms had not been invented then) in public areas and specifically in front of the King\u2019s court and officers, was just an instruction that allowed the King to forcibly deter mobs who could attack him.<\/p>\n

The people had no right to carry weapons because the King hadn\u2019t given them that right. The entire model of English law, supposedly beginning with Magna Carta in 1215, is that people get their rights from their rulers which is diametrically opposite of the American model which radically and uniquely is based on the model that people have all rights which come from their \u201cCreator\u201d, and they keep all rights one can conceive except the ones they explicitly say Government can access.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
The second problem is that even if this English law could be used to explain the founders\u2019 understanding of \u201carms\u201d and \u201ccarrying arms\u201d, the constitution was drafted in 1787, some 450 years after the Statute of Northampton. It is being invoked to allegedly help us understand words that were written only 237 years ago \u2013 which is completely illogical. If we can\u2019t understand what someone wrote 237 years ago, how could the framers understand words written 450 years before them well enough to inform their understanding?<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The English law arguments are used to prop up the fallacious position that the meaning of the Second Amendment is unclear, and no legitimate judge should indulge in such a discussion. It is irrelevant and that\u2019s what it should be labelled.<\/p>\n

DC:<\/strong>\u00a0You make a point of noting the Constitution places control of the Militia under the national government and not the states. What\u2019s your basis for that, and what happens when the people of a state decide the feds are tyrannizing them?<\/p>\n

ON:\u00a0From the beginning of the colonization of this continent, the defense of the colonies was provided by the colonists themselves, called the Militia. It consisted of every abled bodied man who were required to furnish their own guns and ammunition. So basically, every citizen served.<\/p>\n

This is contrasted with a professional army, which is composed of people who do nothing else but be soldiers \u2013 train, shoot, drill, etc. The training obviously makes them much more effective than the Militia, but also more costly \u2013 and dangerous to the citizens if they are used in the wrong way, like propping up a tyrannical government.<\/p>\n

Everyone realized after the revolution Militia was not sufficient, and the debate about forming a \u201cwell regulated militia\u201d began. Well regulated means they carry the same types of guns, have the same type of training, spend time training, etc. They are a subset of the traditional militia.<\/p>\n

It was correctly decided that if the well regulated militia was necessary to protect the whole country, that it should logically be under control of the federal government, and Article 1 section 8 gives Congress the power to arm and train the Militia.<\/p>\n

Now there\u2019s a problem. The new Constitution gave the Feds an army, navy, and the Militia, so the individual states and the people in them are defenseless against the Federal power. When the Militia was taken from the states, and the power to arm them given to Congress, the People needed a power that would enable them to control this Federal government \u2013 thus the 2nd Amendment.<\/p>\n

DC:<\/strong>\u00a0You also indicated via correspondence that Clarence Thomas, viewed by many as the best mind on the court when it comes to the Second Amendment, has reached some conclusions that will end up working against us. Why, and what\u2019s your solution?<\/p>\n

ON:\u00a0My concerns with the current court, including Clarence Thomas, is that they effectively are using the \u201cthe 2nd amendment is unclear\u201d argument, and have directed lower courts to use the \u201chistorical\u201d record as \u201cevidence\u201d of what the framers and the states were legislating in 1791 so what the meaning is.<\/p>\n

The first problem, apart from the fact that the 2nd Amendment is not in any way unclear, is that the first stop in understanding what the framers and ratifiers thought the 2nd Amendment means should be what they actually said it means in the debates and in the newspapers.<\/p>\n

There is unanimous interpretation in all the debates and publications by everyone, so no one should have to resort to English laws of 1328 and what kinds of laws were enacted in certain states around 1792.<\/p>\n

By indulging in this type of discussion, Justice Thomas legitimizes it and clears the way for judges in lower courts to rule in bizarre and disingenuous ways, such as ruling that AR-15\u2019s are \u201cmilitary\u201d weapons not covered by the 2nd Amendment.<\/p>\n

What must happen is that the Supreme Court needs to reengineer their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment to be correct \u2013 that it HIGHLIGHTS the right of the people to keep and bear any and all types of arms primarily so that they have the realistic ability to control the Federal government if it becomes tyrannical. The highlight of this right does not mean that the people do not have the right to keep guns for self-defense or hunting \u2013 two uses that the framers and ratifiers explicitly stated didn\u2019t need to be highlighted because the thought the government could regulate them was ABSURD!<\/p>\n

We could go on, but that\u2019s enough to consider for now, and is sure to result in discussion from those who haven\u2019t looked beyond\u00a0Bruen<\/em>. Hopefully, readers will be intrigued enough to do some further explanation, and for that, two resources come readily to mind:<\/p>\n

First, read the\u00a0Firearms News review<\/a><\/em>.<\/p>\n

Then obtain a copy of\u00a0The Misinformation Antidote: Protect Yourself, Your Country, and Your Planet<\/em>, and read it. It can be purchased as a paperback, E-book and audiobook at\u00a0BookBaby.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Misinformation Antidote: Protect Yourself, Your Country, and Your Planet The constant barrage of conflicting truths from various factions contributes to soaring levels of anxiety and depression. Enter “The Misinformation Antidote,” a groundbreaking book that unveils the solution to this pervasive problem. The book’s positive impact extends beyond its primary mission of combating misinformation. A … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-103832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-books","category-rkba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=103832"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103832\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":103833,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/103832\/revisions\/103833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=103832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=103832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=103832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}