{"id":103995,"date":"2024-08-30T08:17:58","date_gmt":"2024-08-30T13:17:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103995"},"modified":"2024-08-30T08:17:58","modified_gmt":"2024-08-30T13:17:58","slug":"103995","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=103995","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

Gun Owners for Harris Highlight Lie of \u2018Second Amendment Democrats\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cWe can prevent gun violence while also supporting the Second Amendment,\u201d a Giffords-sponsored \u201csportsmen\u2019s\u201d effort lies. \u201cGun Owners for Safety<\/a>\u00a0unites hunters, sport shooters, and collectors who want commonsense gun laws.\u201d<\/p>\n

Giffords, of course, along with all the other major gun prohibitionist groups, has endorsed\u00a0Kamala Harris<\/a>, who will sign whatever anti-gun legislation the Democrats succeed in passing and go for what they can\u2019t through executive action. And then she\u2019ll reshape the Supreme Court. That\u2019s some \u201ccommonsense support.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s never hard to find “Fudds”<\/a> who are enthusiastic about voting for citizen disarmament pushing politicians and throwing fellow gun owners under the bus. A prime example is Harris’ Vice President pick, Tim Walz, once “A” rated and endorsed by the NRA. But while low information voters are being gaslit into thinking the Second Amendment can be ‘respected’ while it’s being eviscerated, a striking inequity is being revealed.<\/p>\n

There is no parallel \u201cpro-Second Amendment Democrat\u201d movement happening. That\u2019s because there\u2019s no such thing as one.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\n
Sure, there are superficially \u201cpro-gun Democrats\u201d who act like the Second Amendment is about duck hunting, but at the end of the day they\u2019ll support Party gun-grabbers and a president determined to reshape the Supreme Court until Bruen<\/em>\u00a0becomes a forgotten speed bump.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Where are Second Amendment Democrats for Trump?<\/p>\n

Experience shows they prioritize other issues above the right to keep and bear arms, meaning they really don\u2019t understand it to be a right at all. This was unequivocally proven years ago, when I conversed with the head of the\u00a0Second Amendment Democrats<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

After all kinds of weasel-wording and\u00a0Molon Labe<\/em>-ing, he finally could not deny the one truth that ultimately defines them:<\/p>\n

Under no circumstances will Amendment II Democrats support Republican candidates who run against anti-RKBA Democrats. We are, after all, Democrats.<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
\n
That\u2019s all I needed to know. They support citizen disarmament. After it\u2019s all said and done, they support taking your guns<\/a>, which has always been the end goal.<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

I don\u2019t know (or care) whatever happened to them, but do note there is\u00a0a Facebook group that goes by that name<\/a>, a group you can join with all of 19 members that doesn\u2019t look like it\u2019s been active for years. They offer further confirmation that there\u2019s no such thing as what they claim to be:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hello everyone. Who do we all think will be best on the 2nd Amendment of the current field? My guess is Bernie Sanders, though I suppose Amy Klobuchar has represented the most constituents with guns.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

I agree that Bernie is the best bet. Not sure if Buttegeig would prioritize gun control like Booker or Warren.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Personally I feel like Buttigieg is the best candidate for president and to run against Trump, but not sure how I feel about any of their stances on gun control. There are so many issues.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

It\u2019s not my top priority either\u2026<\/strong><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Obviously.<\/strong><\/p>\n

It\u2019s not for the Giffords Fudds, either:<\/strong><\/p>\n