{"id":111254,"date":"2025-07-18T16:11:18","date_gmt":"2025-07-18T21:11:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=111254"},"modified":"2025-07-18T16:11:18","modified_gmt":"2025-07-18T21:11:18","slug":"111254","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=111254","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

The Bombshell Tulsi Gabbard Just Dropped on the Russian Collusion Hoax Should Terrify Every American<\/a><\/p>\n

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday released an earth-shattering report detailing how federal agencies under the Obama administration manipulated intelligence findings to concoct and promote the Russiagate hoax.<\/p>\n

This, along with earlier revelations about how intelligence agencies pushed the false narrative about President Donald Trump and Russia, shows just how deep the scheme ran.<\/p>\n

In the lead-up to the 2016 election, multiple internal assessments concluded that the Russian government was not trying to influence the outcome of the race, according to a memo that Gabbard released. Multiple intelligence agencies came to the same conclusion.<\/p>\n

On August 31, 2016, \u201ca DHS official tells former DNI James Clapper that there was \u2018no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Nevertheless, the FBI allegedly asked the agencies to water down their assessments to avoid coming to solid conclusions. On September 2, the Bureau asked that a whistleblower\u2019s report be \u201csoftened\u201d and acknowledged that they were \u201cuncomfortable\u201d with implying \u201cdefinitive information that Russia does intend to disrupt our elections.\u201d<\/p>\n

Later, an official with the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) insisted that the next Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) should affirm that the Kremlin \u201cprobably is not trying\u2026to influence the elction by using cyber means.\u201d Several IC officials concurred.<\/p>\n

These assessments resulted in the September 12 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) which noted that \u201cforeign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks on election infrastructure.\u201d<\/p>\n

After Trump won the 2016 election, intelligence officials reaffirmed that Russian cyber operations had not influenced the outcome. However, the assessment was abruptly suppressed. In December, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper\u2019s office started compiling a new Presidential Daily Briefing that also confirmed that Russia did not sway the results of the race.<\/p>\n

However, Gabbard\u2019s memo notes that the FBI \u201cinexplicably withdraws from coordinating on the product\u201d and expressed plans to draft a dissent. Later in the day, a senior PDB official kills the PDB \u2018based on some new guidance.\u2019\u201d The original briefing, noting that Russia did not affect the election, was never published.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Top Obama administration officials began meeting in December 2016 to discuss Russia\u2019s election interference efforts. The press began reporting on the claims immediately after. Internal records reveal that there was still no IC documentation indicating that the Kremlin employed cyberattacks to influence the election. Nevertheless, \u201cDeep State officials in the IC begin leaking blatantly false intelligence to the Washington Post\u2026claiming that Russia used \u2018cyber means\u2019 to influence \u2018the outcome of the election,\u2019\u201d according to the memo.<\/p>\n

Another flood of leaks occurred later in the month. \u201cIC officials again leak to the media, this time claiming that IC officials believe \u2018with a high level of confidence\u2019 that Russian President Vladimir Putin was personally involved in the \u2018U.S. Election Hack.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

Former President Barack Obama chimed in on the matter days later, noting that there was no \u201cevidence of machines being tampered with,\u201d but that he was concerned about \u201cpotential hacking that could hamper vote counting and affect the actual election process.\u201d<\/p>\n

Fast-forwarding to January 6, 2017, the Intelligence Community released another assessment that excluded evidence that Russia had impacted the election. \u201cAs for the 2017 ICA\u2019s judgment of a decisive Russian preference for then-candidate Donald Trump, I could not concur in good conscience based on information available, and my professional analytics judgement,\u201d the ODNI whistleblower wrote.\u201d<\/p>\n

The individual recalled that his superior told him, \u201cyou need to trust me on this\u201d and referred to reporting that the whistleblower was \u201cnot allowed to see.\u201d The final ICA that was publicized claimed Russia had meddled in the election to help Trump win based on \u201cfurther information\u201d that had \u201ccome to light\u201d after the election.<\/p>\n

Of course, that \u201cfurther information\u201d was later revealed to be the infamous Steele Dossier, whose contents have been debunked many times over since it first surfaced. The memo explains that the ICA \u201csuppresses intelligence from before and after the election showing Russia lacked intent and capability to hack the 2016 election.\u201d The ICA \u201cdeceives the American public by claiming the IC did not assess the \u2018impact\u2019 of Russian activities.\u201d<\/p>\n

Forces within the Intelligence Community sidelined the whistleblower and concealed the inclusion of the Steele Dossier in the final report. \u201cLate December 2016 \u2014 Due to the ODNI Whistleblower\u2019s questioning his leadership about why an IC assessment was being created that contradicted multiple IC assessments, the whistleblower is immediately removed from emails regarding the drafting of the Obama-ordered IC assessment,\u201d the memo reads.<\/p>\n

It was not until 2019 that the whistleblower learned the Steele Dossier played a role in the ICA.<\/p>\n

At this point, there is nothing shocking here. The claim that Russia had meddled in the 2016 election to help Trump win was always questionable at best and an entire government-funded hoax at worst. The revelations coming in Trump\u2019s second term only solidify what many already knew.<\/p>\n

But what is truly galling about this fiasco is that nobody will be held accountable. We have seen rampant Deep State corruption in the federal government over the past decade. The nation has witnessed how nefarious forces sought to weaponize federal agencies against the president without facing any real consequences. I see no reason to believe that there will be any accountability \u2014 although I hope to be wrong on this.<\/p>\n

The memo highlights just how broken our two-tiered justice system works. Here is the question that I have in light of this: f corrupt government officials can literally use the power of government to attack a political opponent without consequences, how much worse could they do to everyday Americans who lack the resources to fight back?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Bombshell Tulsi Gabbard Just Dropped on the Russian Collusion Hoax Should Terrify Every American Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard on Friday released an earth-shattering report detailing how federal agencies under the Obama administration manipulated intelligence findings to concoct and promote the Russiagate hoax. This, along with earlier revelations about how intelligence agencies pushed … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,9,50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-111254","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bureaucraps","category-enemies-foreign-domestic","category-goobermint"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111254","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=111254"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111254\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111255,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111254\/revisions\/111255"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=111254"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=111254"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=111254"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}