Well, all they really know is grandstanding Kabuki theater, so what should we expect?<\/p>\n
Democrats\u2019 performative anger on guns offers no real solutions<\/a><\/p>\n Even while law enforcement officers hunted for the gunman who murdered two students and wounded nine others at Brown University in\u00a0Rhode Island<\/a>\u00a0last week, gun restrictionists unleashed their typical unhinged rhetoric. Take the reliably partisan Sen.\u00a0Chris Murphy<\/a>\u00a0(D-CT): He\u00a0blamed<\/a>\u00a0President Donald Trump for engaging in a \u201cdizzying campaign to increase violence in this country.\u201d<\/p>\n The anger is performative and cynical.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n After all, Rhode Island already features every gun regulation Democrats propose we pass nationally.\u00a0Like everywhere else in the country, all gun purchases go through an FBI\u00a0background check\u00a0<\/a>in Rhode Island. The state has closed the so-called \u201cgun-show loophole.\u201d There\u2019s a waiting period to obtain a gun. Felons are banned from owning firearms. Rhode Islanders must take safety training to obtain \u201cblue permits\u201d to own handguns even in their own homes. \u201cAssault weapons,\u201d the concocted classification\u00a0Democrats<\/a>\u00a0have given scary-looking semiautomatic rifles, are banned. There\u2019s also a ban on magazine capacity above 10 rounds. Citizens have a duty to retreat for self-defense rather than a right to stand their ground. Rhode Island has one of the lowest percentages of gun owners in the country.<\/p>\n One of the popular rejoinders from restrictionists when you point out all these laws is to tell you that passing \u201csafety\u201d laws means little if neighboring states have permissive\u00a0gun regulations<\/a>. So, for instance, Chicago politicians are perpetually blaming Indiana for crime, even though Indiana has lower crime levels. Well, Rhode Island is surrounded by states with some of the most restrictive gun laws in the country, Connecticut and Massachusetts. All three states have passed restrictions that go well beyond any bill that could conceivably pass national or, likely, constitutional muster.<\/p>\n Besides all those constraints, guns are also effectively banned in all Rhode Island schools and universities. Brown University is a \u201cgun-free zone.\u201d Or, in other words, staff, professors, and students are expected to cower in fear and wait for police or security to arrive as the murderer walks around with impunity. Parents trust administrators and professors to house, feed, and educate their children, but not to have a concealed carry permit and possibly save students in case of tragedy.<\/p>\n In any event, the idea, often pushed by the Left, that people have unfettered access to guns is a myth. There are somewhere around 40,000 laws restricting guns on the books in the United States. No constitutional right is nearly as regulated. It\u2019s exceptionally likely that the Brown shooter broke a slew of laws before he murdered anyone.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/p>\n So, what is left to pass?<\/p>\n For years, Australia, where two Islamists allegedly\u00a0murdered\u00a0<\/a>16 people and hurt scores of others celebrating Hanukkah on Bondi Beach this weekend, has been\u00a0held up by many Democrats as the way forward on gun regulation. After a horrifying\u00a0massacre<\/a>\u00a0at Port Arthur\u00a0in 1996, the Australian government passed\u00a0new\u00a0firearms<\/a>\u00a0laws\u00a0banning ownership of almost all semiautomatic weapons, all self-loading rifles and shotguns, and put stringent restrictions on the sale of ammunition for existing weapons. Citizens can only own guns if they demonstrate to authorities a \u201cgenuine reason\u201d for ownership \u2014 and \u201cthe right to self-defense\u201d isn\u2019t a valid\u00a0one.<\/p>\n Australia proceeded to run a \u201cbuyback\u201d program that lasted nearly a year, in which time the government ended up paying citizens for 640,000 firearms \u2014 how a Pakistani immigrant whose son was under suspicion of having ties to the Islamic State group could possess\u00a0six\u00a0firearms is a bit baffling. When politicians bring up Australia, they mean confiscation.<\/p>\n To begin with, it\u2019s highly debatable that the two-decade decline in crime in Australia that Democrats point to is wholly, or even largely, attributable to new gun laws. Criminality precipitously dropped across most of the West, including in the U.S., over those two decades.<\/p>\n More pertinently, though, \u201cit will never happen here.\u201d For one thing, the American legal tradition makes it impossible to confiscate guns. It\u2019s unambiguously unconstitutional. Gun restrictionists would need to overturn the\u00a0Second Amendment<\/a>\u00a0to ban guns that are in common use.<\/p>\n Need it be said that even if we ignored the Constitution \u2014 it wouldn\u2019t be the first time \u2014 and passed Australian-style laws, massive civil unrest would soon follow. There are many more guns in the country than people. Pollsters can\u2019t even get the average American to tell them if they have a gun, much less how many. The notion that most citizens are handing over their weapons to authorities is ludicrous. Even today, whenever cities have buyback events, most participants trade in their antiquated revolvers and rifles to upgrade to better ones with the cash. Unless you\u2019re willing to see the National Guard go house to house seizing firearms \u2014 and perhaps Murphy would be amenable to such a policy \u2014 proposing Australian-style laws is a waste of time.<\/p>\n Moreover, we shouldn\u2019t be aping Australian laws, even if that country is marginally safer. As we saw during COVID-19, Australians are susceptible to being ruled by authoritarian governments. Left-wingers saw two terrorists with guns shooting innocent people on Bondi Beach. I saw two terrorists with guns shooting hundreds of innocent people who had been denied the right to defend their families by the government. Of all the natural rights codified in the Constitution, none \u2014 not freedom of speech, press, or religion, or the ability to vote or to demand due process \u2014 had a longer or deeper history in our law and tradition than the right to defend oneself.<\/p>\n We\u2019re not\u00a0Australia<\/a>. So perpetually rehashing the same tired arguments gets us nowhere.<\/p>\n Mass shootings<\/a>, typically defined as an incident where four or more people are murdered in a public place, will almost always attract more media attention. But building gun policy around mass shootings, as horrific as they are, is a bad idea. Mass shootings, driven chiefly by mentally disturbed or politically motivated individuals, are distinct from other criminality. Even using the most generous definition \u2014 and anti-gun groups make up all kinds of misleading statistics \u2014 mass shootings still encompass only a tiny percentage of overall gun crimes. The number is somewhere around 1% to 2%.<\/p>\n Most gun crimes are driven by predictable criminality. If\u00a0we were really interested in mitigating gun deaths, there are avenues to pursue. Vigilantly enforcing gun laws that already exist is one. There\u2019s no reason, for instance, that we aren\u2019t prosecuting more adults who fail to secure guns in houses with children or people who lie on background checks. Reaching out to help those in pain in our communities is another. Most gun deaths, after all, are suicides.<\/p>\n Then, of course, locking up violent criminals for longer prison terms is likely the most obvious and effective way to mitigate gun crime. The preponderance of firearm offenses is perpetrated\u00a0by\u00a0recidivists<\/a>. Gun offenders have a higher recidivism rate than virtually anyone in any other criminal category.<\/p>\n You\u2019re not going to be able to eliminate guns. But you can do more to detain the people who abuse them, a far more realistic solution that the gun restrictionist probably doesn\u2019t want to hear.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Well, all they really know is grandstanding Kabuki theater, so what should we expect? Democrats\u2019 performative anger on guns offers no real solutions Even while law enforcement officers hunted for the gunman who murdered two students and wounded nine others at Brown University in\u00a0Rhode Island\u00a0last week, gun restrictionists unleashed their typical unhinged rhetoric. Take the … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114045","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crap-for-brains","category-editorial-o-the-day"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114045","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=114045"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":114046,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114045\/revisions\/114046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=114045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=114045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=114045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}