{"id":114861,"date":"2026-01-29T11:54:26","date_gmt":"2026-01-29T17:54:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=114861"},"modified":"2026-01-29T11:54:26","modified_gmt":"2026-01-29T17:54:26","slug":"114861","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=114861","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

Functional Illiteracy<\/a><\/p>\n

The Age of Functional Illiteracy<\/strong><\/p>\n

Functional illiteracy was once a social diagnosis, not an academic one. It referred to those who could technically read but could not follow an argument, sustain attention, or extract meaning from a text. It was never a term one expected to hear applied to universities. And yet it has begun to surface with increasing regularity in conversations among faculty themselves. Literature professors now admit\u2014quietly in offices, more openly in essays\u2014that many students cannot manage the kind of reading their disciplines presuppose. They can recognise words; they cannot inhabit a text.<\/p>\n

The evidence is no longer anecdotal. University libraries report historic lows in book borrowing. National literacy assessments show long-term declines in adult reading proficiency. Commentators in\u00a0The Atlantic<\/a><\/em>,\u00a0The Chronicle of Higher Education<\/a><\/em>, and\u00a0The New York Times<\/a><\/em>\u00a0describe a generation for whom long-form reading has become almost foreign. A Victorian novel, once the ordinary fare of undergraduate study, now requires extraordinary accommodation. Even thirty pages of assigned reading can provoke anxiety, resentment, or open resistance.<\/p>\n

It would be dishonest to ignore the role of the digital world in this transformation. Screens reward speed, fragmentation, and perpetual stimulation; sustained attention is neither required nor encouraged. But to lay the blame solely at the feet of technology is a convenient evasion. The crisis of reading within universities is not merely something that has happened\u00a0to<\/em>\u00a0the academy. It is something the academy has, in significant measure, helped to produce.<\/p>\n

The erosion of reading was prepared by intellectual shifts within the humanities themselves\u2014shifts that began during the canon wars of the late twentieth century. Those battles were never only about which books should be taught. They were about whether literature possessed inherent value, whether reading required discipline, whether difficulty was formative or oppressive, and whether the humanities existed to shape students or merely to affirm them. In the decades that followed, entire traditions of reading were dismantled with remarkable confidence and astonishing speed.<\/p>\n

The result is a moment of institutional irony. The very disciplines charged with preserving literary culture helped undermine the practices that made such culture possible. What we are witnessing now is not simply a failure of students to read, but the delayed consequence of ideas that taught generations of readers to approach texts with suspicion rather than attention, critique rather than encounter.<\/p>\n

This essay is part of a larger project to trace that history, to explain how a war over the canon helped usher in an age in which reading itself is slipping from our grasp, and why the consequences of that war are now returning to the academy with unmistakable force.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Functional Illiteracy The Age of Functional Illiteracy Functional illiteracy was once a social diagnosis, not an academic one. It referred to those who could technically read but could not follow an argument, sustain attention, or extract meaning from a text. It was never a term one expected to hear applied to universities. And yet it … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,59],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114861","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial-o-the-day","category-education-schools"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=114861"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114861\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":114864,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114861\/revisions\/114864"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=114861"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=114861"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=114861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}