{"id":116518,"date":"2026-04-29T19:11:31","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T00:11:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=116518"},"modified":"2026-04-29T19:11:31","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T00:11:31","slug":"116518","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=116518","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

ATF Repeal Group<\/a><\/p>\n

ATF is proposing to formally rescind regulatory changes made in 2023 regarding firearms equipped with stabilizing braces. Multiple federal courts have found that the 2023 rule \u2013 as codified in 27 CFR 478.11 and 479.11 \u2013 violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and the rule has been enjoined, stayed, or vacated across numerous jurisdictions. This proposal removes regulatory language that has been largely unenforceable, restoring the regulatory definitions to be consistent with the underlying statutory definitions.<\/p>\n

27P:\u00a0<\/strong>Revising\u00a0Regs\u00a0Defining\u00a0\u201cEngaged in the\u00a0Business\u201d\u00a0as a\u00a0Dealer in\u00a0Firearms\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>– NPRM<\/strong><\/p>\n

ATF is revising regulatory changes it made to the definition of the \u2018engaged in the business\u2019 of dealing in firearms. The rule rescinds certain provisions of the definition of \u2018engaged in the business.\u2019 The rescinded changes have not produced the anticipated outcomes in terms of Federal Firearms License applications, administrative licensing actions, civil forfeitures, or other anticipated enforcement metrics. The rule retains the definition of \u2018engaged in the business\u2019 as specifically revised and codified by Congress in the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA), ensuring that ATF\u2019s regulatory definitions reflect the statutory language Congress enacted.<\/p>\n

2024-01F:\u00a0<\/strong>Revising\u00a0Machine\u00a0Gun\u00a0Definition\u00a0in Response to\u00a0Supreme Court\u00a0Decision\u00a0<\/strong>– FINAL RULE<\/strong><\/p>\n

ATF is removing two sentences from its three regulatory definitions of “machine gun” that previously incorporated bump stocks into those definitions. This action responds directly to the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in\u00a0Garland v. Cargill<\/em>\u00a0(2024), which held that semiautomatic rifles equipped with bump stocks do not satisfy the statutory definition of “machine gun” under the National Firearms Act. This rescission aligns ATF’s regulatory text with the statute and the Court’s binding legal interpretation.<\/p>\n

28P:\u00a0<\/strong>Removing Youth Handgun Safety Act Notice –\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>NPRM<\/strong><\/p>\n

ATF is proposing to rescind 27 CFR \u00a7 478.103 to remove the requirement for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to post a sign (ATF I 5300.1) and provide a written notification (ATF I 5300.2) to each handgun purchaser regarding the Youth Handgun Safety Act. This 1998 regulation was established to inform purchasers of the 1994 Youth Handgun Safety Act. The proposed recission reduces an unnecessary burden on FFLs to inform purchasers about a law that has been in place for over 30 years and is now readily accessible.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ATF Repeal Group ATF is proposing to formally rescind regulatory changes made in 2023 regarding firearms equipped with stabilizing braces. Multiple federal courts have found that the 2023 rule \u2013 as codified in 27 CFR 478.11 and 479.11 \u2013 violated the Administrative Procedure Act, and the rule has been enjoined, stayed, or vacated across numerous … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,79],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-116518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bureaucraps","category-government"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=116518"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116518\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":116523,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/116518\/revisions\/116523"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=116518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=116518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=116518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}