{"id":117212,"date":"2026-06-09T07:32:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-09T12:32:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=117212"},"modified":"2026-06-09T07:32:57","modified_gmt":"2026-06-09T12:32:57","slug":"117212","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=117212","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

SCOTUS 2A Decisions on Horizon; More Cases Waiting in Wings<\/a><\/p>\n

By Dave Workman<\/p>\n

Editor-in-Chief<\/p>\n

Sometime between now and the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down rulings on a pair of Second Amendment cases which could have considerable impact on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, and those who use controlled substances.<\/p>\n

The cases are known as\u00a0Wolford v. Lopez<\/em>\u2014which challenges a restrictive Hawaii carry law\u2014and United\u00a0States v. Hemani<\/em>, which challenges the ban on gun ownership by persons who regularly use illegal drugs, including marijuana.<\/p>\n

Reuters<\/a>\u00a0is reporting that Hayley Lawrence, executive director of the Duke Center for Firearms Law, and is described as a \u201cgun control advocate,\u201d expects Hawaii to lose. The Aloha State currently requires property owners to provide \u201cexpress authorization\u201d to any legally armed citizen to bring their firearm onto private property which is open to the public (i.e. restaurants, supermarkets, shopping malls, etc.).<\/p>\n

An affirmative ruling by the high court could nix, or greatly restrict, government designations of so-called \u201csensitive places\u201d as a means of discouraging concealed carry.<\/p>\n

In the Hemani case, Reuters heard from Darrell Miller, a law professor at the University of Chicago. He suggests the court might deliver a narrow ruling.<\/p>\n

Waiting in the wings<\/a>, according to the Second Amendment Case Tracker, are several other Second Amendment cases, including a couple for which the court has been essentially \u201ckicking the can down the road\u201d for several weeks, and their outcome could have a significant impact on restrictive state gun laws.<\/p>\n

Chief among these are\u00a0Duncan v. Bonta<\/em>, a case out of California challenging California\u2019s ban on so-called \u201clarge-capacity magazines,\u201d and\u00a0Gator\u2019s Custom Guns v. Washington<\/em>, challenging the Evergreen State\u2019s ban on \u201clarge-capacity magazines.\u201d Both cases have been essentially gathering dust, and it is likely the Supreme Court would consider both together.<\/p>\n

An affirmative ruling would be a hammer blow to several states and the gun control lobby, which has a big stake in the outcome. Should the court take both cases and rule such magazines are protected by the Second Amendment, it would be an embarrassing loss to anti-gun politicians including California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson, the latter who has boasted frequently that he has never lost a case to the gun lobby.<\/p>\n

Another case with sweeping implications is\u00a0Viramontes v. Cook County<\/em>, challenging the ban on so-called \u201cassault weapons\u201d in Illinois. If the court takes this case and rules on the side of the Second Amendment, it could remove similar bans in California, Washington, New York and several other states.<\/p>\n

Similar cases are\u00a0Nat\u2019l Assoc. for Gun Rights v. Lamont<\/em>\u00a0and\u00a0Grant v. Higgins<\/em>, challenging the semi-auto ban in Connecticut. Lamont also challenges the state\u2019s ban on magazines holding more than 10 rounds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

SCOTUS 2A Decisions on Horizon; More Cases Waiting in Wings By Dave Workman Editor-in-Chief Sometime between now and the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hand down rulings on a pair of Second Amendment cases which could have considerable impact on the rights of law-abiding gun owners, and those who use … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-117212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-courts","category-rkba"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=117212"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117212\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117213,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117212\/revisions\/117213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=117212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=117212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=117212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}