{"id":74640,"date":"2021-11-23T16:08:15","date_gmt":"2021-11-23T22:08:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=74640"},"modified":"2021-11-23T23:47:55","modified_gmt":"2021-11-24T05:47:55","slug":"74640","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=74640","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Warning; Obscene language<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>BLUF:<br \/>\n<em>Basically guys, all the outrage over this trial is because the left is terrified of losing another tool in their toolbox. They love lawless mobs terrorizing you and wrecking your stuff. They love having you too scared of the system to stand up to their dirtbags.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/monsterhunternation.com\/2021\/11\/21\/fisking-one-of-the-many-dumb-hot-takes-on-the-rittenhouse-case\/\">FISKING ONE OF THE MANY DUMB HOT TAKES ON THE RITTENHOUSE CASE<\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the aftermath of the Rittenhouse trial there are a bunch of posts like this floating around social media. They all work off the same talking points so they are basically interchangeable. These are all being shared to bamboozle the gullible and shore up the dedicated idiots. I picked this one because of how many lies and distortions it packed into one post.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Going into detail on all of his fuck ups would take a book, so this is kind of a turbo fisk, and it\u2019s still long. I know I\u2019ve got a ton of lawyers who read these, so if I screwed anything up let me know.<\/p>\n<p>As usual, the idiot I\u2019m fisking is in\u00a0<em>italics.<\/em>\u00a0My responses are in\u00a0<strong>bold.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>From a military legal worker:<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 after you read this you\u2019ll agree that\u2019s almost certainly a lie or a bit of exaggeration.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I\u2019m seeing a lot of ignorance and misinformation flying around about what happened in Kenosha,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 so he\u2019s about to add to it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and I\u2019m going to set the record straight from a professional legal position\u2026<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 as you will see, this is a horseshit. Instead he obfuscates the law to sell a narrative.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>as well as from a former military position.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 utterly irrelevant appeal to authority. Military experience has nothing to do with civilian self-defense law. That\u2019s like Neil DeGrasse Tyson syndrome, where you know about astronomy, so obviously we all want to hear your dumbass opinion on every other topic.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I\u2019m going to explain some things from a more technical angle derived from my many years as a paralegal and from my experience working in federal criminal justice and prosecution.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Let\u2019s see how that shakes out for him, shall we?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Legally, if you are in the process of a commission of a crime, it negates your ability to claim self defense if you kill someone. As in, it can\u2019t even be entered as your official defense in court.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 except this trial needed to determine if KR was in fact in the commission of a crime or not. Related, and I\u2019m surprised this guy didn\u2019t bring it up is the claim that the judge was \u201cbiased\u201d because he wouldn\u2019t let the rioters be called \u201cvictims.\u201d Well duh, that\u2019s because the purpose of a case like this is for the jury to decide if they are victims or assailants.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>On that note, since I\u2019m shooting down all the other stupid talking points, here\u2019s a common one. Whenever some prog says the judge was biased, ask how, and then watch them choke. If they respond, it\u2019ll be the \u201cvictims\u201d bit, or it\u2019ll be that the judge yelled at the prosecutors for saying that invoking your 5th Amendment rights makes you guilty, or when they got caught not giving the defense the right evidence. But none of that was bias. That was embarrassing levels of prosecutorial misconduct. They didn\u2019t deserve to be yelled at, they deserve to be disbarred, and then sent to jail.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>It is similar to getting rear-ended at a red light through zero fault of your own, but you were driving without a license or insurance. It automatically makes you at fault because you weren\u2019t even legally allowed to be driving.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 as you will see, this guy loves to torture analogies. Too bad they don\u2019t actually apply to this case.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>That 17 year old in Kenosha had committed two crimes and was not even legally allowed to open carry the rifle he used to shoot three people. This means that he legally cannot claim self defense.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Demonstrably false. He was legally allowed to be carrying that rifle in Wisconsin. So that whole opening argument was moot. The weapons charge was dropped because the Wisconsin law did in fact allow KR to carry that gun, in that way, in that place.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>I\u2019m glad he didn\u2019t bring up the whole hE cRoSsEd sTaTe lInEs!! talking point though, because that\u2019s just stupid. He drove in from the suburbs to a place where he works and a bunch of his close family live.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Another key discussion is the Castle Doctrine<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 thus begins a super long digression into a law which doesn\u2019t really have anything to do with the KR case in an attempt to sound smart to low information types.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Some of you may be vaguely familiar with it,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-More than this jackass, obviously.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>as it is what allows you to use deadly force when someone comes into your house unlawfully, etc. But there are some finer points most people don\u2019t realize that you generally have to do some formal legal studies to know.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 as in formal legal studies, he means reading tweets from blue check mark dorks on Twitter.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>First, as soon as someone sets foot inside the threshold of your home uninvited that you believe intends to commit a crime, you can legally use deadly force and it is immediately considered self defense, even if they haven\u2019t made any violent threats or actions towards harming you. This is because in every instance outside your home, you are required to retreat and extricate yourself from a dangerous situation if possible.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u2013\u00a0<strong>Wrong. Holy shit, you fucking mope, insanely wrong. The first part is kinda right, but dumbed down, and the second half is just fucking insane. He\u2019s mixing up Castle Doctrine with Duty To Retreat, and most states have no Duty to Retreat.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>It is a legal mandate, not a suggestion.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 It\u2019s bullshit.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Your home is considered the final retreat point, and legally you should be safe in your \u201cCastle.\u201d There is nowhere else to retreat to, etc. This is why you are able to immediately use deadly force. However, it is NOT to protect your property, it is for protecting your LIFE.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Depending on what state you live in, this is also wrong.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>And once the burglar, for instance, has left your home\u2026 the threat to your life is considered neutralized, and deadly force is no longer authorized. So if a burglar runs out the door and down the street with your TV, you are no longer allowed to shoot after them because they are not threatening your life. You call the police, you file a claim with your insurance, and you get a new TV. If you shoot a burglar in the back down the street, you can and should be charged with murder.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-So he went through all of that stuff explaining the law wrong, just to get to a tortured analogy that has nothing to do with the KR case\u2026 What that actually was, was an attempt to sound like a big smart legal expert on the internet to bamboozle the gullible.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>While you are out in PUBLIC, this means a lot of things obviously. It means that there is far more scrutiny and boxes that must be checked in order to claim self defense.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Sorta, but this porkchop could have just explained how self-defense law actually works rather than his goofy bit about Castle Doctrine, but if he\u2019d done that honestly it would later be clear that clearing KR was the correct decision. How it actually works in most of America (super brief version) \u2013 does your assailant have the ability and opportunity to cause you serious bodily harm, and are they acting in a manner that a reasonable person would believe they are an immediate threat?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Here is an article I wrote 7 years ago that goes through all this in a little more depth.\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/monsterhunternation.com\/2014\/11\/25\/the-legalities-of-shooting-people\/\">https:\/\/monsterhunternation.com\/2014\/11\/25\/the-legalities-of-shooting-people\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Note. Nobody who knows the stuff in that article was surprised by this verdict. If you follow our social media our biggest doubts about the verdict concerned jury intimidation, and just how much prosecutorial misconduct Flufferboy2004 and Fatlock would be able to get away with. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>You must be in IMMINENT danger of losing life and limb.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong><em>\u2013\u00a0<\/em>True. And at this point I\u2019m actually amazed he got one!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Getting into an argument and feeling scared of being punched by an unarmed person? Not likely to be a situation where deadly force is authorized.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-But then right back to the lies. If he was such a legal expert he\u2019d know that it is well established that you do not need a weapon to have ability to cause serious bodily harm. Personal Weapons (hands, feet) are used in more murders in America than rifles.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>You MUST retreat.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>\u2013<strong>\u00a0A particularly galling lie, and also irrelevant to this case because KR did retreat repeatedly. First he ran from Rosenbaum and did not fire until cornered. Then he tried to retreat to the police when he was intercepted by Huber and Jump Kick Man.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>If someone shoots at you or pulls a knife on you in the street, that is deadly force and can be met with deadly force.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 partially true, but dumbed down. See above about ability, opportunity, and jeopardy. They can have a knife or a gun, but they also have to be acting in a manner that suggests they are an immediate threat of doing something with it. So no, leftyprog dipshits, your silly memes to the contrary you can\u2019t just attack people who are openly armed. That\u2019s illegal and a quick way to leave the gene pool.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>But if the person is unarmed, you cannot shoot them because you\u2019re afraid of a little scuffle.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 A filthy lie. I guarantee that with my bare hands I could place this individual into a situation where he would have no choice but to use lethal force against me or perish. The Prosecution tried this idiot argument on the jury, with their \u201ceverybody takes a beating sometimes\u201d. No. Legally, you do not have to \u201ctake a beating\u201d. Fuck off with that nonsense. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>That is why Rittenhouse illegally shot the first protester, and it is one of the many reasons it cannot be considered self defense.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Lie. Rosenbaum had the ability and opportunity and was clearly presenting a threat of serious bodily harm. Rosenbaum made verbal threats of serious bodily harm. KR did retreat. Rosenbaum pursued and then tried to take the rifle. Video, witnesses, and forensic evidence are all in agreement.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>The man threw a plastic bag with trash in it at him AND MISSED, and Rittenhouse shot him.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Are you an underpants gnome? What happened to the entire middle part of the story, you dishonest fuck?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>He chased his victim and instigated a fight by brandishing and flagging people with his rifle,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 More lies. There is no evidence from video or witnesses that KR chased anyone. Having a slung rifle is not legally brandishing. The prosecution tried to make the flagging argument, but the only way they could do so was to show a super grainy picture that A. was created using software that is specifically NOT to ever be used for evidentiary purposes. And B. in that AI created picture, KR magically turned left-handed for a second, which is a neat feat considering the rifle was slung (as in attached to his body) RIGHT in every other video.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The prosecution also tried and failed to make the instigation argument, because KR used a fire extinguisher to put out an arson fire started by Rosenbaum, thus provoking the fine and upstanding citizen. HOW DARE HE!?!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>because he is an untrained idiot with a gun.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 A profoundly disingenuous argument. Training is awesome (I love taking gun classes, and used to teach some) but training is not a prerequisite for exercising your right to self-defense. Most defensive gun uses in America are done by people with little to no real training. And despite that lack of professional training KR still kept a cooler head and a better hit percentage than many police departments.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>The protester was not a threat,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Another lie. See the link about reasonable man assumptions. You are not required to assume the best about the angry crazy guy who earlier promised to murder you. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and even if he was, all he had to do was retreat back to the police line.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 a foul and loathsome lie, because KR clearly tried to run away from Rosenbaum, who CHASED HIM.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>He rushed at protesters with a gun drawn to pick a fight,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Lie. You guys sensing a pattern to these narratives yet?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and people are acting as if he were just there to keep the peace.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 As established by all the witnesses, his giving first aid, and the putting out fires, he was. And even if he wasn\u2019t, and he was just hanging out, that doesn\u2019t negate his right to self-defense.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>He fired INTO A CROWD,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 He did not. He fired at individual targets. Most of whom were at contact distance because they were actively striking or grabbing for him at the time. The only one shot past conversational distance was actively pointing a firearm at KR and admitted so under oath.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and it\u2019s a miracle he didn\u2019t hit more people.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 true of any gun use in a chaotic urban environment, however that doesn\u2019t negate his right to fire the gun in an act of self-defense.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>More people that hadn\u2019t thrown a plastic bag.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 note how this dishonest piece of shit once again leaves out the verbal threats, the chase, and the attempted weapon snatch. None of this is in question. Even the prosecution\u2019s own witnesses cop to this. Even the prosecution admitted to the attempted snatch when they tried to make the claim that because the gun was slung KR would be fine\u2026 Which just shows that Littlebinger knows as much about weapon retention as he does gun safety. Because someone gets ahold of your slung rifle, and you don\u2019t know how to lock it down, you\u2019re gonna end up as the tetherball.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>More people that were just trying to protest police brutality,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Calling this a lie is too generous. That\u2019s fucking asinine bullshit. I\u2019m sure the decent human beings who were there to peacefully protest bail when the assholes start setting garbage trucks on fire. There is a difference between protestors and rioters, and America is sick of you disingenuous fucks purposefully confusing the two. So take your \u201cfiery but mostly peaceful protest\u201d and shove it up your ass.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>which is a real issue in this country.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 Police brutality does happen. And I\u2019d bet that if this guy really is in law enforcement (lol) he would be one of the problems. It\u2019s always the guilty assholes who posture and project the hardest who do nasty shit. His writing shows a clear lack of integrity and character. Anybody with this much ego and dishonesty would have zero problem giving a suspect a little stick time and covering it up later.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>And then when he did finally run away, some more protesters attempted to subdue him after he had already murdered someone, he tripped, and shot two people trying to stop him from shooting others.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u2013 More lies and leaving out the inconvenient bits. KR was retreating toward the police. I believe the RIOTERS who tried to intercept him hadn\u2019t seen him shoot Rosenbaum (can\u2019t confirm this though because it appears the prosecutors hid Jump Kick Guy from the defense), they were acting off of the word of the mob, and they tried to intercept him BEFORE HE COULD GET TO THE COPS. He was struck. Kicked in the head. And beaten with a skateboard.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>After shooting Huber, Grosskeutz (sp?) got shot. Only he did not get shot until he RAISED HIS PISTOL AND POINTED IT AT KR. He was even dumb enough to say this on the stand. (this was the funniest moment of the whole trial). Afterwards Prosecutor Lunchbox tried to argue that pistols aren\u2019t dangerous when being used one handed. Between that and Flufferboy talking about exploding hollowpoints, all of us gun people got severe migraines while watching this amateur hour shit.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>On a completely unrelated note Grosskeutz looks like a Great Value Hunter Biden. And from all the DUIs and falling out of his chair drunk during the pre-trial, apparently parties like Hunter too.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>The fact that the police didn\u2019t arrest him and take him into custody right then and there, even if they suspected it could be self defense, is a grave issue with that police department.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-This is the only inadvertently honest thing this piece of detritus has said. It is a bummer the cops dropped the ball and told KR to buzz off, because if they\u2019d done their jobs then it would\u2019ve killed that stupid lefty nonsense about \u201cfleeing across state lines\u201d (i.e. driving back to the suburbs). But if the police had been doing their jobs that night, Rosenbaum and crew wouldn\u2019t have been out destroying things and setting other people\u2019s property on fire.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I could further dissect this situation, but for now I\u2019m going to end with people passing around misinformation about the victims being \u201ccriminals so they deserved it.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Oh, I\u2019m sure he could go on, but if this dreck was what he lead with, I wouldn\u2019t expect more analysis to get any better.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>First, there are no actual records of Jacob Blake or the people shot by Rittenhouse being in the official sex offender\u2019s registry. None of them raped a 14 year old girl years ago, that is complete fabrication being purposely spread by right wing extremist sites in order to try and justify the shootings.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-A total lie. Rosenbaum has been confirmed to be a total shitbag. I believe he was convicted of forcible sodomy of five boys, aged 5 to 11, and literally got out of a mental ward that morning. \u00a0Huber was also a felon. Grosskeutz had an expunged felony and charges pending. Jump Kick Guy had multiple felonies and charges pending. And I believe the others two assholes who were with that crew, and fired the first shots, also had felonies. And none of those felonies were for tax evasion, if you know what I mean. That\u2019s a hell of a ratio and says a lot about the nature of these \u201cpeaceful protestors\u201d.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The fun part about all this is that the left has to simp for pedophiles and pretend these dregs of society were heroic victims, even though we all know the real reason the left is upset is they can\u2019t abide the idea of regular people not being too terrified of the system to stand up to their terror mobs.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Jacob Blake was indeed awaiting trial for sexual assault and trespassing, and did have a warrant for his arrest. It was not assault on a child, because that is a different charge with a different title. On the charging document, it would literally say that it was against a child. From what is publicly known, he allegedly broke into an ex girlfriend\u2019s house and allegedly assaulted HER, but he is innocent until proven guilty, and still deserves his day in court. He could truly be innocent.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-This bit is extra fucking stupid because Jacob Blake wasn\u2019t there, so all that is irrelevant.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>Rittenhouse\u2019s victims do not appear to have had any record,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-I am in awe of the investigative abilities of this dolt who is supposedly in law enforcement. If he\u2019s in your jurisdiction, good luck with that.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and even if they did, he couldn\u2019t have known that at the time. You cannot insist a shoot was justified AFTER the fact because \u201cthat person was a criminal.\u201d Criminals have rights too, whether you like it or not, and it is enshrined in the very documents that built our country.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-He\u2019s actually right here, except in an utterly pointless way. KR didn\u2019t need to know their life stories to know that they were trying to murder him in that moment. That\u2019s what matters. And the judge didn\u2019t allow the defense to bring up their long sleazebag records in the trial, so that\u2019s irrelevant there too. However, in the court of public opinion, the nature and character of those men becomes extremely important. And despite liberals not understanding the difference, the court of public opinion is different than a court of law.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>If you don\u2019t like the constitution and bill of rights, I don\u2019t know what to tell you.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Vote Democrat?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>This is also not MY OPINION, this is literally how the criminal justice system and our laws work.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-No. It\u2019s an opinion. And it\u2019s a fucking dumb one at that. And shithead knows it too, which was why this is getting shared across the internet with no real name attached to it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I hold a degree in paralegal studies and served 8 years as an Army paralegal.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-So you fetched coffee for JAG officers who went to actual law school.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I\u2019ve worked for the criminal division in the Chicago US Attorney\u2019s Office,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Chicago? Well that fucking explains it. Once Lori Lightfoot gets her ten thousandth shooting the Red Skull will give her the Soul Stone.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and currently work in federal law enforcement.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Where? The TSA?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Okay, to be fair, looking at the incredibly shitty state of many federal law enforcement agencies now, this part is probably true. He\u2019s currently waterboarding an 86-year-old grandma for taking a selfie in the Capitol on January 6<sup>th<\/sup>.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>This is what I do for a living, and I am not pulling this out of my ass,<\/em>\u00a0<em>and my knowlege is a culmination of working in the field and being passionate about justice for 16 years.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Pulling this out of your ass would probably be an improvement from where you actually got it from.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>But hey, at least he\u2019s passionate in his dishonesty. I guarantee if this piece of shit is a fed he\u2019s the kind who keeps his jackboots polished, and he thought Christoph Waltz played the hero in Inglourious Basterds. To all my LE readers, fed, state, and local, you know exactly what type of motherfucker I\u2019m talking about.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I\u2019d be happy to send you sources and opines and case law and statutes if you need it.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-SEND IT, MOTHERFUCKER. All my fisks go viral so you\u2019ll probably see this. Post them in the comments. And also post your actual resume so we all know what jurisdiction to avoid because it\u2019s LE is brain damaged.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I did not get this from \u201cmainstream media,\u201d and I am not brainwashed by the left.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-You lying piece of shit, that was regurgitated blue check mark twitter pontificating with some C- level essay answers about self-defense law tacked on. Mainstream media would be a step up for you, and that\u2019s saying something because Brian Stelter is a potato.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>I\u2019m an independent progressive.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-Oh, EXCUSE ME. My apologies when I thought you were \u201cleft\u201d when you\u2019re an \u201cindependent progressive\u201d, which is apparently a synonym for braindead ass-muppet who faps to Bernie Sanders speeches.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>On that note, since so many dumbfuck progs have been saying KR was a mass shooter, if you see a dude with a rifle in a public place the best way to find out if they intend a mass shooting or not is ask them how they feel about Bernie Sanders. If they say they love Bernie, FUCKING RUN FOR YOUR LIFE!!!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>May he face justice for what he did,<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-And I hope you face justice for being a lying piece of shit, but I won\u2019t hold my breath.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>and may we find a way to get on common ground before more fuses to this powder keg are lit.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-The shit head arguing in favor of fiery riots is upset that the rule of law won out over jury intimidation, and he wants to chide us about \u201ccommon ground\u201d. We have no ground in common. Your fuckers are the ones who keep lighting the powder kegs, then you get butt hurt when somebody shoots them rather than getting blown up.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><em>This has been my Ted Talk.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>-That was a steaming pile of giraffe vomit. \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Basically guys, all the outrage over this trial is because the left is terrified of losing another tool in their toolbox. They love lawless mobs terrorizing you and wrecking your stuff. They love having you too scared of the system to stand up to their dirtbags. So that\u2019s why they are lying their asses off and shedding fake tears for pedophile scum. The jury\u2019s decision didn\u2019t just say Rittenhouse was not guilty, but by extension, it says their useful idiot rioters were guilty, which damages the narrative. And anytime the truth goes against the narrative, the truth gets a bullet to the back of the neck.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>The problem the left ran into this time in the court of public opinion was that all of the actual facts of the case were out there for anyone to see. (I really recommend Rekieta Law, who had phenomenal and entertaining coverage with lawyers watching the live stream. I was glued to it for much of the trial). So with the independent media doing the job that regular media won\u2019t, it\u2019s tougher for dishonest fucks like this to spread their lies.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>But gullible people still listen to the media and the blue check marks, which was why they were heartbroken on Friday. If you actually believed the narrative nonsense, this case seems like a travesty.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sorry, leftist punditry. You tried to put your fingers on the scale again, but you failed.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Cope and seethe, you dishonest fucks.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Warning; Obscene language BLUF: Basically guys, all the outrage over this trial is because the left is terrified of losing another tool in their toolbox. They love lawless mobs terrorizing you and wrecking your stuff. They love having you too scared of the system to stand up to their dirtbags. FISKING ONE OF THE MANY &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=74640\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-74640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rkba","category-self-defense"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=74640"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74640\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":74681,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/74640\/revisions\/74681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=74640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=74640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=74640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}