{"id":85299,"date":"2022-09-04T01:37:19","date_gmt":"2022-09-04T06:37:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=85299"},"modified":"2022-09-04T01:37:19","modified_gmt":"2022-09-04T06:37:19","slug":"85299","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=85299","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<p>BLUF<br \/>\nBack in the United States, American Farm Bureau Federation Chief Economist Dr. Roger Cryan estimates that a Sri Lankan-style move would cut domestic grain crop production by about 50 percent within two to four years of implementation, leading to massive price hikes and acute shortages of basic commodities&#8230;&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Should California \u2013 or the nation \u2013 \u00a0take the path of most destruction and implement restrictions or even fertilizer bans, the social and economic impacts would be catastrophic and could hearken back to the conditions during the Great Depression of the 1930s \u2013 except this time there wouldn\u2019t be any bread lines because there wouldn\u2019t be any bread.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2022\/09\/03\/from-sri-lanka-to-salinas\/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=from-sri-lanka-to-salinas\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">From Sri Lanka to Salinas<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Ah, Sri Lanka.<\/p>\n<p>In 2020: a beautiful, agriculturally self-sufficient island nation full of tea and tourists and holder of the highest \u201cEnvironmental, Social, and Governance\u201d (ESG) investor rating in the world.<\/p>\n<p>And then, as part of the larger \u201cgreen\u201d effort spurred on by international Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), woke capital, and, seemingly, a desire to sit at the big table at the various and sundry global initiative conferences, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa banned the use of manufactured fertilizer in order to create a more climate-friendly sustainable farming sector.\u00a0 In April, 2021, the country went all-organic overnight.<\/p>\n<p>What could possibly go wrong?<\/p>\n<p>By the end of last year, Sri Lanka became unable to feed itself, prices for food (especially rice) and fuel and other daily basics skyrocketed, the tea crop \u2013 and the hundreds of millions it earns in international trade \u2013 was decimated.\u00a0 The nation defaulted on its foreign debt, had rolling power blackouts, the tourists are staying away in droves, and Sri Lanka, \u00a0already wracked by corruption and COVID, spiraled out of control.<\/p>\n<p>The public\u2019s response?\u00a0 Even though the fertilizer ban had already been partially rolled back, just last month Rajapaksa\u2019s presidential palace was stormed by thousands of everyday Sri Lankans and he had to flee the country \u2013 last word was that he was holed up in Singapore.<\/p>\n<p>(Side note to Nancy Pelosi and Liz Cheney \u2013 this is what an actual insurrection looks like:)<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Sri Lankan protesters attack homes of President and PM as pair promise to resign | ABC News\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/U8Np8BtHMhc\" width=\"700\" height=\"394\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><span data-mce-type=\"bookmark\" style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;\" class=\"mce_SELRES_start\">\ufeff<\/span><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>It seems Kermit was right \u2013 it ain\u2019t easy being green.<\/p>\n<p>But, considering the state\u2019s claim to be the global leader in fighting climate change, can California \u2013 with its extremely powerful \u201cclimate lobby\u201d that was able to ban the future sales of new gas-powered vehicles, a concept that would have been unthinkable a<em>\u00a0very<\/em>\u00a0few years ago \u2013 \u00a0be far behind?<\/p>\n<p>California\u2019s commitment to confronting climate change cannot be underestimated., as proven by the 86 different climate partnerships, or \u201cbilateral and multilateral agreements with national and subnational leaders\u201d the state as entered into.\u00a0 (The list can be found here:\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.energy.ca.gov\/about\/campaigns\/international-cooperation\/climate-change-partnerships\">https:\/\/www.energy.ca.gov\/about\/campaigns\/international-cooperation\/climate-change-partnerships<\/a>\u00a0.)<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, a quick tour of state department websites finds numerous examples of \u201cgreen,\u201d \u201csustainability,\u201d and \u201cclimate\u201d pages and plans; even the state\u2019s prisons get into the act with its climate change plan:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cdcr.ca.gov\/green\/cdcr-green\/climate-change-adaptation\/\">https:\/\/www.cdcr.ca.gov\/green\/cdcr-green\/climate-change-adaptation\/<\/a>\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>It should be stressed that California is not above shooting itself in the foot when it comes to climate issues. Thursday, the legislature passed a bill mandating 3,200-foot \u201cbuffer zones\u201d around all \u2013 new and existing \u2013 oil and gas wells, a move which would practically eliminate the industry \u2013 and its 13,000 jobs \u2013 in the state.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>And last week, the plan to completely ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles by 2035 was approved by the state\u2019s Air Resources Board.\u00a0 Yesterday, with the already strained power grid facing massive heat-related shortfalls, Californians were asked, among other things, to not charge their electric cars (about 11 percent of the cars in the state) when they got home from work.<\/p>\n<p>A fertilizer ban could have similar severe knock-on impacts, and massive unemployment and other serious disruptions akin to those Sri Lanka experienced could follow.<\/p>\n<p>While there is no specific proposed legislation currently, Governor Gavin Newsom often touts his climate bona fides which could leave the door open to future efforts.\u00a0 \u201cNo challenge poses a greater threat to our way of life, prosperity, and future as a state than climate change,\u201d said Newsom on Earth Day in April, more than a year into the Sri Lanka debacle. \u00a0\u201cWith our rich natural heritage on the front lines of this crisis, California is building on our global climate leadership with bold strategies that harness the power of nature to fight climate change and protect our communities and ecosystems.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Considering the state\u2019s political landscape, it appears the unthinkable could already starting to be thought.<\/p>\n<p>For background, the push to ban or restrict the use of manufactured fertilizers (in other words, not compost or manure) was formerly mostly tied to waterway protection (as the former Mayor of Lake Elsinore, Cal. I can personally attest to the kind of rapid growth \u2013 in our case sadly algae \u2013 nitrogen and phosphorus can spur in plants.\u00a0 PS \u2013 since the city and other agencies started large-scale remediation efforts, the lake has been wonderfully clear).<\/p>\n<p>The current push, however, revolves around climate change and is based on the claim that nitrogen is a greenhouse gas so farmers should stop putting it on their plants.\u00a0 While this claim is misleading \u2013 defining nitrogen as a greenhouse gas is rather new and shaky itself, the overwhelming majority of nitrogen in fertilizers is captured by the plant itself or the soil, and modern farming techniques have greatly reduced the problem of \u201cover fertilizing\u201d \u2013 \u00a0it has not stopped climate change activists from pushing massive restrictions and, in Sri Lanka\u2019s case, outright bans.<\/p>\n<p>It is true, however, that nitrous dioxide \u2013 that stuff you inhale at the dentist\u2019s office \u2013 is considered a greenhouse gas and that it can be produced by fertilizer application.\u00a0 However, since the crops and soil capture so much, it only is produced in significant quantity if far too much fertilizer is used, a practice the majority of farmers eschew because it is usually unnecessary and always more expensive \u2013 fertilizer isn\u2019t free and can add up to about 5 percent of a farm\u2019s expenses.\u00a0 Here is a graph showing the impacts of over-fertilization and the minimal emissions (essentially indistinguishable from the \u201cbackground noise\u201d) when used typically and properly:<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-10213527 jetpack-lazy-image jetpack-lazy-image--handled\" src=\"https:\/\/149366104.v2.pressablecdn.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199.png\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 350px) 100vw, 350px\" srcset=\"https:\/\/149366104.v2.pressablecdn.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199.png 350w, https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199-300x171.png 300w\" alt=\"\" width=\"350\" height=\"199\" data-attachment-id=\"10213527\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/wattsupwiththat.com\/2022\/09\/03\/from-sri-lanka-to-salinas\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/149366104.v2.pressablecdn.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199.png\" data-orig-size=\"350,199\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-medium-file=\"https:\/\/149366104.v2.pressablecdn.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199-300x171.png\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/149366104.v2.pressablecdn.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/06b18986-1f0a-4a56-ae85-3b111751acc6_350x199.png\" data-lazy-loaded=\"1\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>(From the University of California\u2019s Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources and can be found here:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/Nutrient_Management_Solutions\/stateofscience\/Nitrous_Oxide__In_focus\/\">https:\/\/ucanr.edu\/sites\/Nutrient_Management_Solutions\/stateofscience\/Nitrous_Oxide__In_focus\/<\/a>\u00a0).<\/p>\n<p>In the Netherlands, farmers have taken to the streets to protest planned government (and European Union) mandated nitrogen use cuts of up to 70 percent.\u00a0 Such cuts would devastate the agricultural sector, which currently makes the tiny country the second largest exporter of farm products in the world (only the United States exports more food).\u00a0 Due to the impact on livestock feed costs and availability, it is estimated that \u2013 in addition to massive crop losses \u2013 about 30 percent of Dutch farm animals would have to be killed to meet the climate change target.<\/p>\n<p>Canada is also proposing nationwide nitrogen cuts of up to 30 percent, leaving farmers there worried about their futures and the continued assurance of the nation\u2019s food supply.<\/p>\n<p>The impact nitrogen fertilizers have on the atmosphere \u2013 which is already about 78 percent nitrogen \u2013 is so small it cannot be accurately measured (see graph above), said Dr. Jay Lehr, environmental scientist and agricultural economist.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI can see why certain politicians are attracted to the idea, but it\u2019s just too crazy,\u201d Lehr said, adding that if the United States and\/or California were to mimic Sri Lanka it would lead to \u201cstarvation and desperation\u201d and the bankrupting of the majority of farmers.\u00a0 \u201cThis movement is trying to roll-back the green revolution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The green revolution Lehr referred to has nothing to do with the current political meaning of the term \u201cgreen,\u201d but the post-World War II movement to increase yields through improved crops, fertilizer use, technological enhancements, irrigation, and scientifically-sound farming practices.\u00a0 The movement is credited with literally saving more than a billion lives around the globe in the past 70 years and led to one of its chief architects, Norman Borlaug \u2013 who famously said \u201cYou can\u2019t build a peaceful world on empty stomachs\u201d \u2013 to being awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.<\/p>\n<p>Borlaug\u2019s revolution is a very specific target of many climate activists and the various international government agencies and NGOs that support them.<\/p>\n<p>In its position paper entitled \u201cStrengthening agroecology for a fundamental Transformation of agri-food systems,\u201d the World Future Council \u2013 a German-based NGO\/think tank \u2013 \u00a0states: \u201cThe message has now gotten through: the negative effects of industrial agriculture have long been clear; they include water shortages, species extinction, high greenhouse-gas emissions, soil degradation, and land grabbing. They cause social, economic and ecological damage that harms the livelihoods of peasants.\u201d\u00a0 \u00a0(You can visit the website at:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.worldfuturecouncil.org\/\">https:\/\/www.worldfuturecouncil.org\/<\/a>\u00a0)<\/p>\n<p>Borlaug may have passed away in 2009, but his quote regarding such groups seems apropos:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSome of the environmental lobbyists of the Western nations are the salt of the earth, but many of them are elitists. They\u2019ve never experienced the physical sensation of hunger. They do their lobbying from comfortable office suites in Washington or Brussels. If they lived just one month amid the misery of the developing world, as I have for fifty years, they\u2019d be crying out for tractors and fertilizer and irrigation canals and be outraged that fashionable elitists back home were trying to deny them these things.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Another international group, the Global Green Growth Initiative (the GGGI, a treaty-based organization that works with the UN where it has \u201cObserver\u201d status, like the Red Cross) praised Sri Lanka two years before its ban went into place for its three-year climate change plan.\u00a0 To quote the GGGI:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cGGGI welcomed the Government of Sri Lanka as its thirtieth Member in January 2019, committing to support the country as it asserts its commitment to achieving its sustainable development and NDC goals. As Sri Lanka\u2019s delivery partner for the 3-year GCF-National Adaptation Planning (NAP) Readiness Support Program, GGGI will support Sri Lanka\u2019s NDC on adaptation by further strengthening its adaptation planning process and capacity to implement NAP.\u00a0 It also aims to enhance the country\u2019s access to climate finance for the implementation of its national adaptation plan. Working towards 6 sub-outcomes through 20 key outputs, the project\u2019s target impact is a built resilience of the most vulnerable sectors and communities in Sri Lanka to adverse effects of Climate Change through Sri Lanka\u2019s strengthened capacity to implement National Adaptation Planning.\u201d (note \u2013 this quote is repeated in its entirety to give the reader a better flavor of the incomprehensible \u201ccitizen of the world\/corporate speak\u201d most of these endeavors evince.\u00a0 For more on the GGGI, you can read its \u201cgender and inclusive development\u201d policy statement here:\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/gggi.org\/theme\/gender-and-inclusive-development\/\">https:\/\/gggi.org\/theme\/gender-and-inclusive-development\/<\/a>\u00a0).<\/p>\n<p>The GGGI, like many other NGOs and government agencies \u2013 and some very major financial players like BlackRock (the $10 trillion asset management fund) \u2013 see \u201csustainability\u201d and its related ESG rating (like a bond rating except for non-financial aspects of a company or country) as integral components of investing strategies, grant and credit worthiness, and the like.\u00a0 This pressure to please the international money (and government) people is a significant driver of initiatives such as Sri Lanka undertook and the Netherlands and Canada are currently considering.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018If the goal is to kill California agriculture, ESG is a very effective way to do it,\u201d said James Taylor, president of the Heartland Institute.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the obvious catastrophe, even Sri Lankan activists are not giving up.\u00a0 The Green Movement of Sri Lanka \u2013 supported internationally by the European Union, etc. \u2013 seems to embody much of movement\u2019s zeitgeist and remains committed to the cause, with the website reading, in part:\u00a0 \u201cFriends, sustainability is complex and requires a fundamental kindness and empathy among its proponents. Therefore, let us not work with the stupidity of industrial age mindsets in our ongoing effort to shift to sustainability.\u00a0 We do not have to agree but at the very least, let us agree not to disagree.\u201d\u00a0 This debate-shuttering \u201cagreeing to not disagree\u201d idea is a sentiment shared by much of the activist movement, no matter the country. \u00a0(note \u2013 you can find out more at:\u00a0\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/gmsl.lk\/\">https:\/\/gmsl.lk\/<\/a>\u00a0)<\/p>\n<p>Back in the United States, American Farm Bureau Federation Chief Economist Dr. Roger Cryan estimates that a Sri Lankan-style move would cut domestic grain crop production by about 50 percent within two to four years of implementation, leading to massive price hikes and acute shortages of basic commodities.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFeeding the world is not an easy thing to do,\u201d Cryan said.\u00a0 \u201cSri Lanka was clearly a failure.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>After re-iterating the fact that, given its uptake into plants and the soil \u201cnitrogen and phosphorus do not represent a greenhouse gas problem, Cryan also noted that if Sri Lanka\u2019s overnight organic model were followed that\u00a0 there is simply \u201cnot enough manure and compost on the planet\u201d to make up the difference to keep crop yields steady.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019d hate to see something done if they don\u2019t do the math,\u201d Cryan said.\u00a0 \u201cWe shouldn\u2019t be talking about farming less \u2013 it can\u2019t be a trade-off.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The impact in California, home to $50 billion agricultural industry and about 12 percent of the nation\u2019s entire farming output, would be devastating.<\/p>\n<p>A.G. Kawamura, an Orange County farmer, former Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, and co-chair of Solutions From the Land, an international, UN-backed group dedicated to \u201cincreasing agricultural productivity (including ecosystem services and societal benefits) and incomes; adapting and building resilience; and reducing and removing greenhouse gas emissions\u201d expressed doubt that many climate activists truly comprehend the complexities of farming.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s the nightmare of the good intentions of the activists who don\u2019t understand how the food supply system works,\u201d Kawamura said.\u00a0 \u201cThey either can\u2019t understand or will not understand because it doesn\u2019t play with the people who pay them.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Eliminating manufactured fertilizers from the agriculture equation removes a \u201ctool to keep the system robust and when you start taking away tools it becomes challenging if not impractical to continue,\u201d Kawamura said.<\/p>\n<p>With the world\u2019s eight billionth person expected to be born in November, Kawamura strongly believes that protecting the capacity to feed people is paramount.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAbundance allows for choices,\u201d said Kawamura.\u00a0 \u201cIt allows for organic farming, it allows for \u2018laboratory meat,\u2019 it creates the space to innovate.\u201d\u00a0 But scarcity leads to a mere state of survival, effectively closing off those avenues, he warned.<\/p>\n<p>Kawamura added that a fertilizer ban would\u00a0 \u201ccollapse the production curve\u201d in California within about three years of implementation.<\/p>\n<p>As for the possibility of the enactment of severe restrictions, while Lehr believes California farmers are likely politically powerful enough (unlike Sri Lankan farmers) to forestall such a move, Kawamura is less sanguine.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe legislature and this governor do not appear to prioritize agriculture,\u201d Kawamura said.\u00a0 \u201cFor years, farmers haven\u2019t been negotiating (in Sacramento) to get more, but just to lose less.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>California growers harvest more than 400 different types of crops \u2013 many what are referred to as specialty \u2013 that each have differing fertilizer needs and protocols so the impacts of its loss would vary widely, though a flat statewide ban would be catastrophic no matter the crop.\u00a0 Farmers in other states that concentrate on grain and other staple crops would face yield losses of up to 60 percent across the board if draconian fertilizer restrictions or bans were put in place.<\/p>\n<p>The dream of an organic-only farming world is a chimera anyway, said Bjorn Lomborg, President of the Copenhagen Consensus (a group that acknowledges anthropogenic climate change but believes the approaches being currently taken to combat it are misguided) and Visiting Fellow at Stanford University\u2019s Hoover Institution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLong simply a fashionable trend for the world\u2019s 1%, environmental activists have increasingly peddled the beguiling idea that organic farming can solve hunger,\u201d Lomborg said.\u00a0 \u201cHowever, research conclusively shows that organic farming produces much less food than conventional farming per hectare. Moreover, organic farming requires farmers to rotate soil out of production for pasture, fallow or cover crops, reducing its effectiveness. In total, organic approaches produce between a quarter and half less food than conventional, scientific-driven agriculture.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lomborg added that these facts \u201cnot only makes organic food more expensive, but it means that organic farmers would need much more land to feed the same number of people as today \u2013 possibly almost twice the area. Given that agriculture currently uses 40% of Earth\u2019s ice-free land, switching to organics would mean destroying large swathes of nature for less effective production.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Should California \u2013 or the nation \u2013 \u00a0take the path of most destruction and implement restrictions or even fertilizer bans, the social and economic impacts would be catastrophic and could hearken back to the conditions during the Great Depression of the 1930s \u2013 except this time there wouldn\u2019t be any bread lines because there wouldn\u2019t be any bread.<\/p>\n<div id=\"wpd-post-rating\" class=\"wpd-not-rated\">\n<div class=\"wpd-rating-wrap\">\n<div class=\"wpd-rating-left\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"wpd-rating-data\">\n<div class=\"wpd-rating-value\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BLUF Back in the United States, American Farm Bureau Federation Chief Economist Dr. Roger Cryan estimates that a Sri Lankan-style move would cut domestic grain crop production by about 50 percent within two to four years of implementation, leading to massive price hikes and acute shortages of basic commodities&#8230;&#8230; Should California \u2013 or the nation &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=85299\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,18,50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-85299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crap-for-brains","category-econuts","category-goobermint"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=85299"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85299\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":85300,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85299\/revisions\/85300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=85299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=85299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=85299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}