When even lefties don’t think much of your plan…….<\/p>\n
Don’t overdo New Mexico’s red flag laws like other states’<\/a><\/p>\n It seems odd that a measure that\u2019s supposed to fight gun crime appears to affect the very people who are the least likely to commit such acts, that is law-abiding citizens who are concealed carry holders.<\/p>\n On Dec. 11, Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham joined other state officials for an update on the ongoing public health orders that restrict concealed carry from parks and playgrounds and promote ostensible gun safety measures.<\/p>\n \u201cLet me just state unequivocally, the public health order has been in effect three months and it\u2019s working,\u201d the governor said at the news conference. According to Lujan Grisham, 219 guns were seized, 2,490 arrests were made, 87 juveniles involved in gun-related crimes have been detained, 13 guns were seized from one repeat violent offender arrested and 439 guns turned in at a gun buyback event by Stat.<\/p>\n First, the governor couldn\u2019t be more wrong about the approach. It\u2019s not a health epidemic, it\u2019s a crime epidemic. And guns are the tools used by criminals.<\/strong><\/p>\n In fact, what the governor touts as a successful mandate is nothing more than officials just doing the job of cracking down on crime. One doesn\u2019t need to have a public health order restricting legal firearms to seize illegal guns, make arrests, host buybacks and have \u201cwarrant roundups\u201d for felons and firearms. One doesn\u2019t need a public health order to punish criminal wrongdoing beyond a slap on the wrist. One doesn\u2019t need a public health order to test the wastewater at schools for drugs.<\/p>\n Still, the governor talks of more, newer laws.<\/p>\n There\u2019s talk about novel assault rifle legislation being pushed at the upcoming 2024 legislative session, where rifles would be limited to 10 rounds, or perhaps an assault weapons ban. Limiting rifles sounds good but rifles are rarely used in crimes or even in mass shootings, statistics show.<\/p>\n Then there\u2019s red flag laws, such as New Mexico\u2019s 2020 Extreme Risk Firearm Protection Order Act or ERPO. A total of 19 states and the District of Columbia have these laws. Lujan Grisham and other state officials want them toughened up.<\/p>\n The main reason is that red flag laws haven\u2019t had a really broad impact in New Mexico since passage. Two years after the ERPO legislation was passed, only nine petitions were filed statewide. By comparison, there were 109 in Colorado in its first year, also 2020. California started out with 85 in 2016, according to that state\u2019s Governor\u2019s Office, but now has racked up more than 3,000 red flag actions.<\/p>\n Even though New Mexico\u2019s ERPO petitions started jumping \u2014 48 being filed since 2022 \u2014 they are a drop in the bucket compared to states like Florida, which has seen more about 10,000 red flag court seizures since 2018.<\/p>\n But research hasn\u2019t really shown a correlation between lowering gun violence \u2014 the problem New Mexico is trying to solve \u2014 and using red flag laws. In fact, there\u2019s no proof red flag laws actually work to reduce crime, though they are a promising tool for stopping mass shootings.<\/p>\n The New York Times reported in January that a recent six-state study of more than 6,700 ERPO cases found that nearly 10% involved threats to kill at least three people. That\u2019s a pretty wide dragnet to land just 10%, but with mass shootings, stopping one can be considered a victory. The Times points out why such laws work so well for mass shooters. Nearly half of individuals who engaged in mass shootings (48%) leaked their plans in advance to others, including family members, friends, and colleagues, as well as strangers and law enforcement officers.<\/p>\n But the study also found that most individuals who perpetrated mass shootings had a prior criminal record (64.5%) and a history of violence (62.8%), including domestic violence (27.9%).<\/p>\n That doesn\u2019t match up with what we were told about the reason for red flag laws. Proponents said they fill a gap where people without criminal records can\u2019t be touched. Some law enforcement officials had found it difficult to seize guns if a gun owner was not a felon or convicted of domestic violence. But in some cases, such laws aren\u2019t needed at all. For example, it\u2019s already a crime to threaten to use a gun on someone.<\/p>\n Law-abiding citizens have long feared red flag laws were susceptible to mission creep, meaning they could devolve into a situation where anyone can just report another, perhaps for political purposes, disrupting the life of a totally innocent person. Right now, the law allows family members to contact law enforcement, who petition the court. Guns can be seized for a year. One idea being floated for the 2024 legislative session is to add to the list of who can report and petition for a person to be subjected to gun seizure, exactly the move that concerns law-abiding gun owners.<\/p>\n The Editorial Board stands firmly against expanding the parties that can report, though we think updates to the Extreme Risk Firearm Protection Order Act, such as making sure law enforcement officers are well trained in the law, are a good idea. This law in particular must be kept free of abuse. It\u2019s a slippery slope that could lead to ruined lives. As eager as we are to catch bad guys, some protections are needed. Those protections already exist in the U.S. Constitution. They\u2019re known as due process and they\u2019re precisely the thing critics say is lacking from ERPOs.<\/p>\n We don\u2019t want the optics of New Mexico ordering thousands of gun seizures per year or devolving into a state of suspicion among neighbors and residents. We need to stay focused on the kinds of crimes that actually plague our metro areas and use solutions to target those crimes, not simply follow the solutions other states have for their own problems.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" When even lefties don’t think much of your plan……. Don’t overdo New Mexico’s red flag laws like other states’ It seems odd that a measure that\u2019s supposed to fight gun crime appears to affect the very people who are the least likely to commit such acts, that is law-abiding citizens who are concealed carry holders. … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,50],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98653","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editorial-o-the-day","category-goobermint"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98653","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=98653"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98653\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":98654,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98653\/revisions\/98654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=98653"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=98653"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=98653"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}