{"id":99222,"date":"2024-01-12T17:25:22","date_gmt":"2024-01-12T23:25:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=99222"},"modified":"2024-01-12T17:25:22","modified_gmt":"2024-01-12T23:25:22","slug":"99222","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/?p=99222","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"

ROCKY MOUNTAIN GUN OWNERS FILE LAWSUIT CHALLENGING COLORADO\u2019S \u201cGHOST GUN\u201d BAN<\/a><\/p>\n

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners [RMGO], Colorado\u2019s only no-compromise gun rights lobby, announced Monday that they have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Colorado\u2019s newly enacted homemade firearm ban, Senate Bill 23-279. The federal court lawsuit aims to overturn the ban, which infringes on Second Amendment rights.<\/p>\n

Three members of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, along with the National Association for Gun Rights, joined as plaintiffs in the lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the ban on the ground that it infringes their right to keep and bear arms.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis law is an outright assault on the constitutional rights of peaceable Coloradans. It\u2019s not just an overreach; it\u2019s a direct defiance to our Second Amendment freedoms,\u201d Rhodes stated. \u201cWe believe that this law, much like others that attempt to restrict gun rights, will not stand up under scrutiny, especially in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Bruen.\u201d<\/p>\n

The lawsuit specifically references the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, which set a precedent that any gun control law must be consistent with the nation\u2019s history and tradition of firearms regulation. Bruen prohibits judges from giving any credence to government arguments that the benefits of a firearm regulation outweigh the burden on citizen\u2019s constitutional rights.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the Bruen decision, the Supreme Court made it clear that any law infringing on the right to bear arms must align with the historical understanding of the Second Amendment. Senate Bill 23-279 clearly does not meet this standard. If homemade \u2013 unserialized \u2013 guns weren\u2019t legal at the time of our nation\u2019s founding, we would all have a British accent,\u201d Rhodes emphasized.<\/p>\n

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners asserts that the new legislation infringes on the rights of gun enthusiasts, collectors, and hobbyists who engage in the lawful creation and possession of homemade firearms. They argue that the bill lacks clarity and unfairly targets peaceable citizens.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe fight for our constitutional rights is never easy, but it\u2019s always worth it,\u201d Rhodes continued. \u201cWe\u2019re committed to ensuring that Coloradans can exercise their Second Amendment rights without undue governmental intrusion. This lawsuit is yet another testament to that commitment.\u201d<\/p>\n

RMGO is urging supporters and gun rights advocates to stand with them as they challenge the unconstitutional law. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for gun legislation and Second Amendment rights, not just in Colorado but across the United States.<\/p>\n

Rocky Mountain Gun Owners is a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization headquartered in Littleton, Colorado, with a mission to hold politicians accountable and achieve maximum liberty for individuals to defend themselves, their family, and their property without having to ask the government for permission to do so. Since its founding in 1996, RMGO has led the fight against anti-gun politicians with the support of more than 200,000 members and grassroots activists statewide.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

ROCKY MOUNTAIN GUN OWNERS FILE LAWSUIT CHALLENGING COLORADO\u2019S \u201cGHOST GUN\u201d BAN Rocky Mountain Gun Owners [RMGO], Colorado\u2019s only no-compromise gun rights lobby, announced Monday that they have filed a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Colorado\u2019s newly enacted homemade firearm ban, Senate Bill 23-279. The federal court lawsuit aims to overturn the ban, which infringes … Continue reading “”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,36],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-99222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-courts","category-gun-schtuff"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99222","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=99222"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99222\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":99223,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/99222\/revisions\/99223"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=99222"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=99222"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/milesfortis.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=99222"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}