American Gun Culture is Changing

Glenn Harland Reynolds

Guns are more plentiful in America than ever; to say lots of people own them would be an understatement. Handgun sales are and have been booming, and gun sales in general have been going up for decades. People who, in my grandfather’s time, would have had a shotgun, a deer rifle and maybe the odd Police Positive or Chief’s Special revolver are now buying bigger gun safes for all the firearms they own for sport and self-defense purposes. According to some estimates, America has somewhere around half the world’s total number of citizen-owned firearms. (As Rosie the Riveter said, “We can do it!”)

As readers of this magazine know, carry permits are common and, as this was going to print, 29 states had constitutional carry, which requires no permit at all for those who can legally possess a firearm. Indeed, open carry itself isn’t something only for Western films. It’s not unusual for me to see someone with a handgun on their hip walking around downtown Knoxville—a few even have a Bowie knife on their other hip. (In Tennessee, since the passage of knife-rights legislation a few years back, automatic knives—the polite term for what used to be called “switchblades”—and fixed blades of any length are legal to carry, which makes me feel vaguely tempted to wear a rapier just to class things up.) People who might have unnecessarily panicked at such a sight a couple of decades ago barely notice now.

So, guns are common. But are they really normal—by this, I mean are they normal in the way they were in my grandfather’s day? Well, I’d say we’re now seeing the beginning of a new normal.

When I was a kid, you could walk into the Sears at the mall and they’d have a gun department, with both long guns and handguns. Catalogs listed them, and Christmas ads in magazines—including kids’ magazines—extolled .22 rifles or .410 shotguns as suitable gifts for boys and girls. Sometimes the ads pictured entire families proudly displaying new guns around the Christmas tree.

High schools had rifle teams, even in New York City. A New York Post retrospective remembers: “Many of the city’s public high schools had shooting clubs and a few even had gun ranges on their premises, according to accounts from the Department of Education and others.” (You can find photos online of teams carrying their rifles to a match as they ride the subway or posing on the school steps with their guns.) Elsewhere, high schoolers would hunt on the way to school or on the way home, leaving their guns in their lockers. Pickup trucks in high school parking lots had gun racks, sometimes with rifles or shotguns visible.

Summer camps and Boy Scout troops inevitably taught riflery, and even my junior high school had an after-school shooting program staffed by NRA volunteers. And none of it was controversial. The “gun culture” was just part of the general culture, as it had been for over two centuries.

Nowadays, after decades of political and cultural attacks from the far Left, guns are common, and there’s a booming gun culture, but it’s different. Interestingly, an increasing number of schools do have shooting teams again. The Scouts still teach riflery, as does 4H, the NRA Youth Hunter Education Challenge (yhec.nra.org) and others. And today, an increasing number of folks, even on the Left, are buying guns for self-defense. But also today, guns are treated as a political statement by some, or they are kept in secret by others who are perhaps afraid of what their friends or neighbors might say.

Sometimes hiding guns from the general public is taken to the point of absurdity, as when, years ago, the filmmaker Steven Spielberg used CGI to turn the federal agents’ guns into walkie talkies in the reissue of the movie E.T.

Actually, these days, Hollywood is a diverse and complicated thing. There are plenty of anti-gun politics to talk about, but then we get a popular character like John Wick. He has plenty of guns, and he’s good with them, but still the things he does are obviously not how guns are actually used in America. Even in movies where guns do play a major role, they’re often not shown realistically. But then, a few popular films and TV dramas have gotten them right, such as much of what Taylor Sheridan has brought us with Yellowstone, 1883 and his other productions.

Of course, most guns in America aren’t carried by individuals like those portrayed in films and TV dramas. They’re carried by ordinary people, or they sit in gun safes waiting for a trip to the range or the hunting grounds. A realistic portrayal might show a gun carried by an ordinary person stopping a crime, as opposed to an arsenal of guns carried by a distinctly unordinary person. (No disrespect to you, Keanu; I’m just saying.)

Yes, movies aren’t realistic. Most people don’t drive like people do in the Fast and Furious movies, either. But you see more automobiles portrayed normally in most movies than you do guns.

All of this has a lot to do with politics, myths about guns and even misunderstandings by producers who clearly don’t understand this culture. Gun controllers started a campaign to “denormalize” gun ownership in the 1970s. They did this through media, with increasingly restrictive rules on the sale, carry and shooting of guns and through across-the-board efforts to eliminate this very mainstream American gun culture.

Even now, the Ad Council—once known for its work targeting forest fires and crime prevention with characters like Smokey the Bear and McGruff the Crime Dog—produces fearmongering anti-gun propaganda exaggerating the supposed dangers of firearm ownership.

These efforts to denormalize guns have worked in certain strains of popular culture and in far-Left enclaves. I remember when I was in law school and I mentioned that I like to go shooting. A classmate asked incredulously, “You’ve shot a gun?” That question was said with a tone of shock—this would not have happened a couple of decades prior.

Fortunately, this cultural divide has changed somewhat since the turn of the millennium and especially since the Supreme Court’s landmark Heller decision of 2008. But we have further to go.

So, that said, how do we continue to renormalize guns in the various slices of the American culture where they have been marginalized? The answer is actually not that complicated. We basically have to do in reverse what was done in the attempt to denormalize them.

As the NRA has long done and is now putting a lot of resources behind, we need to encourage shooting clubs and shooting teams for high school and college students and to support public ranges. We need to continue to defend the citizens’ right to legally purchase guns—again, as this association does so well.

When people walked into a Sears or a Walmart and saw a gun department back in the era of black-and-white TV, even those who never wanted to buy or own guns were exposed to them in a very normal context, and thus to the idea that their fellow citizens owned and bought guns. This still happens today in a lot of stores, but nowadays, you aren’t likely to walk into a general retailer and see guns a few aisles away from refrigerators and washing machines.

On the other hand, you can go on various websites, which did not exist back then, and order an enormous variety of firearms and ammunition (some of my recent law students even launched a successful ammo shop called LuckyGunner.com and this is now where I buy most of mine). Firearms ordered on the internet must—notwithstanding the claims of anti-gunners—be delivered through a licensed gun dealer who will make sure of the paperwork and thus the background check today, whereas, back in my youth, they could be mailed to your front door. But still, the wide array of choices available today trumps anything you could have gotten at Sears or anywhere else back then.

Hunting isn’t as common as it was a half century ago, but it has hardly faded away—and indeed is increasingly popular among nontraditional participants who want organic meat untainted by antibiotics or hormones.

Without getting into all the statistics, it is clearly true that the shooting sports have become much more common than they had been in a long time. (I saw a woman at my gym hoisting a 15 pound barbell up to her shoulder over and over again. “Practicing for 3-gun?” I asked. “How did you know?” she responded. It was pretty obvious, really.) I also now run into shooting clubs at my range all the time, made up of people of all ages and demographics.

Making it easier to carry a gun has gone a long way already to reinforcing how normal this right is. Further progress toward constitutional carry will help. For a long time, I tended to look askance at open carry as tactically unsound (the bad guys know you have a gun) and unnecessarily provocative to those with an acquired dislike of firearms. But Leftists have normalized a lot of things and behavior by simply exposing people to what they hoped would become normal. Why shouldn’t we? It works.

One of my philosophy professors used to talk about the “normative power of the actual,” which is just a fancy way of saying that people tend to think that the things they’re used to are right. We need to get even more people accustomed to guns, at all levels of society. The more this happens, the more it just factors into people’s sense of what is, yes, normal.

And we should openly promote the gun culture, not only through the media, but simply by talking about it in mixed social settings. That’s not a problem for most of us. And everyone here would agree America needs a strong NRA.

Despite the best efforts of the other side, in America, gun ownership has always been normal. Let’s keep it that way, by treating it that way.

South Dakota Regents Finally Adopt Campus Carry Policy

When the fall semester kicks off at South Dakota’s public universities in less than a month, there’ll be at least one big change awaiting students and staff when they return to campus. Orientation materials will now include guidance on lawful carry, because for the first time, lawful gun owners who possess an enhanced carry permit or an out-of-state carry license recognized by South Dakota will be able to lawfully carry in many on-campus locations.

Earlier this year Gov. Larry Rhoden signed SB 100 into law, establishing a legal way for folks to bear arms on the state’s public colleges, universities and technical schools. Though the law took effect on July 1, the South Dakota Board of Regents didn’t get around to adopting its own campus carry policy in accordance with the statute until last week.

Pistols and ammunition must be stored in a locked case or safe when not being carried. The policy sets standards for schools to designate restricted spaces and rules for special events, establishes signage requirements, and addresses storage rules for dormitories. It also requires members of the public using campus facilities to adhere to the same regulations. “

The safety and well-being of our students and campus communities remains at the forefront, and we wanted to make sure that we were very thoughtful, very intentional, on the policy framework that we put together to do that to the best of our abilities,” [Regents Executive Director Nathan] Lukkes said.

Students who live on campus and want to carry will have to provide their own locking case or safe, which seems fair. The new law also allows for the lawful carry of stun guns, mace or pepper spray in addition to or instead of a firearm, with no enhanced carry license required for those items. That’s also a common sense provision, and it allows those who aren’t comfortable carrying a lethal weapon to choose a non-lethal way to protect themselves on campus.

Mother Who Shot Home Intruder In Self-Defense Won’t Be Charged

A Memphis mom won’t face charges after she shot an intruder who broke into her home, per Black Enterprise.

Video of the break-in showed the mother, who remains unidentified, retreating into a room and asking three intruders to leave her home. The mother informed the intruders that she had children in the house with her before she opened fire against one of the women who broke into her home.

21-year-old Kimari Burnham, 21-year-old Nala Kelley, and 22-year-old Dejwan Payne were arrested and charged in connection with the break-in. Burnham, who was shot, was listed in critical condition following the intrusion.

The Shelby County Sheriff’s Office said authorities responded to the scene after receiving reports of a shooting at the woman’s home. Three people broke into the residence at roughly 10 p.m. on the night of the incident. When police arrived, they found Burnham with an apparent gunshot wound. Officials believe the incident was domestic.

All three suspects were charged with aggravated burglary. Burnham and Kelley are also facing additional charges of misdemeanor vandalism.

After collecting evidence from the scene, investigators determined that the Memphis mother acted in self-defense in the shooting of Burnham.

“In Tennessee, you can defend your home with deadly force. So once they cross that threshold and they’re inside your house, that’s enough to assume there’s a presumption made that they’re there to do you harm,” defense attorney Brandon Hall said in a statement. He also stated that the same law applies even if the intruders did not have a weapon with them.

Dad has been on Hospice care at home for two weeks now. He’s still with us here, but his vital signs are slowly diminishing. The nursing staff visits everyday now

I appreciate all the thoughts and prayers and I figure Dad does as well.

 

Well, he’s nothing but a stooge, grandstanding again.

Murphy Tries to Re-Impose (and Hike) NFA Taxes After Congress Zeroed Them Out

We’ve been reporting on a rider inserted in the House Financial Services and General Government appropriations bill that would force Washington, D.C. to recognize valid concealed carry permits from all U.S. states and territories (as well as end the District’s “no guns allowed” policy for public transportation, but pro-gun Republicans aren’t the only ones trying to use the appropriations process to change gun laws.

Murphy’s trying to insert a rider into the Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies appropriations bill with language to undo the NFA reform included in the OBBB and instead raise the transfer tax on NFA items from $200 to $4,709 for each transfer.

As Brady indicates, the nearly $5,000 that Murphy wants to impose essentially indexes the original $200 transfer tax imposed in 1934 to the rate of inflation over the past 90 years. Still, that’s much higher than what we’ve heard proposed from other anti-gun Democrats in Congress, who’ve talked about tripling the $200 tax once they have hte numbers to do so.

And therein lies the problem for Murphy. He can propose any kind of tax increase he wants, but he basically has zero chance of seeing his proposal included in the MCVARA appropriations bill (which has already passed the House). The Republican majority that voted to zero out transfer taxes on suppressors, short-barreled firearms, and “any other weapons” a couple of weeks ago isn’t going to turn around and vote in favor of dramatically hiking the taxes instead.

Murphy’s offered a couple of other amendments to the appropriations bill as well.

Amendment 2972 would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to issue a quarterly report on “the number of veterans who should have been reported to the national instant criminal background check system… if such reporting by the Secretary was permitted, and of those veterans, the number of suicides by firearm that occurred in the previous quarter”.

That amendment is a response to another rider that would extend the VA’s prohibition on submitting the names of those veterans who’ve had a fiduciary appointed to handle their affairs to NICS.

A temporary provision in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2024 and its extensions (including the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act of 2025) prohibited the VA from making these NICS reports without a judicial finding. That provision, though, is set to expire on September 30 unless Congress includes similar language in this year’s appropriations bill.

And Congress has included that language. Section 412 of the MCVARA bill states:

None of the funds made available by this Act may be used by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs under section 5502 of title 38, United States Code, in any case arising out of the administration by the Secretary of laws and benefits under such title, to report a person who is deemed mentally incapacitated, mentally incompetent, or to be experiencing an extended loss of consciousness as a person who has been adjudicated as a mental defective under subsection (d)(4) or (g)(4) of section 922 of title 18, United States Code, without the order or finding of a judge, magistrate, or other judicial authority of competent jurisdiction that such person is a danger to himself or herself or others.

Murphy’s also offered an amendment that would simply strike that language from the appropriations bill so that veterans who’ve had a fiduciary appointed to help manage their financial affairs to be deemed a prohibited person without a judicial finding of dangerousness.

I doubt those amendments are going to fare any better than Murphy’s attempt to jack up NFA taxes by more than 2,000 percent, but gun owners should still be in contact with their Senators to encourage their opposition; both to these amendments and any others that would negatively impact our Second Amendment rights that might be introduced by anti-2A senators.

Missouri Sheriffs’ Constitutional Firearms Alliance

Dozens of Missouri Sheriffs have united to form the Missouri Sheriffs’ Constitutional Firearms Alliance (MSCFA), a group dedicated to safeguarding Second Amendment rights for law-abiding citizens while promoting gun safety throughout communities across the state.

Douglass County Sheriff and president of the MSCFA, Chris Degase, believes there is an agenda at the federal level to control and restrict access to firearms, a sentiment not unfamiliar to gun owners or any person paying attention, for that matter.

“This alliance brings together sheriffs from across our great state who are committed to protecting not just public safety, but constitutional liberty. We believe these two goals go hand in hand. In fact, public safety cannot truly exist where the rights of the people are ignored… With the Missouri Sheriffs Constitutional Firearms Alliance, we are not only standing up for your rights—we are standing in the gap between the federal government and you,” Sheriff DeGase said in a recent press conference.

I was fortunate enough to speak with the good Sheriff, getting to know him better and gaining an understanding of his perspective, particularly his approach to public safety while embracing liberty. In fact, Sheriff DeGase spoke candidly with me about balancing his duty to protect and serve the community without infringing on Constitutional rights, an agenda he takes pride in as an elected official who recognizes and respects the plain text of both his oath and the Second Amendment.

“As sheriffs, we are the only elected law enforcement officers in the nation, directly accountable to the people we serve. And with that responsibility comes an unwavering oath—to uphold and defend the Constitution, not just when it’s easy, but especially when it’s under pressure,” Sheriff DeGase continued.

Along these lines, Sheriff DeGase is not a fan of shutting down inter-agency communication and cooperation, understanding that such resources benefit the community. However, he also recognizes the very real threat to some of America’s foundational freedoms, a bedrock of principles in which he is unwilling to compromise.

Florida: Armed Citizen Saves Woman From Knife-Wielding Attacker In Mall Parking Lot

Anti-gun advocates just can’t bring themselves to admit that armed citizens use their firearms to save themselves from attackers millions of times a year. That fact runs directly against their philosophy and beliefs.

Another thing they’ll never admit is that armed citizens frequently save other people from attackers, using their firearms to protect their unarmed neighbors from bad guys intent on harming them. Good guys with guns are called “good guys” for a reason—they know that helping others who are under attack is a noble endeavor and are often willing to take the risk to do so.

Such was the case recently in a mall parking lot in Orlando, Florida. According to a report from Clickorlando.com, on July 14, an armed man drew his gun and forced another man, who was stabbing a woman with a knife, to stop the attack and flee the scene.

According to local police, security cameras showed that 41-year-old Alinton John and the woman arrived in the parking lot just before 10 p.m., talking for about half an hour, and then got into John’s vehicle. About 10 minutes later, the woman can be seen running toward the mall’s front entrance.

According to the police report, a witness told investigators that he and some family members were standing in the parking lot “when they saw a female ‘all stabbed up’ exit a red Tesla and heard her screaming.” The witness said that he then drew his concealed pistol, racked a round into the chamber, and pointed it at John.