Category: Elections

Border Patrol Union Endorses Trump, Chief Says Everything Would ‘Go to Hell’ Under Kamala

In a move that should surprise no one considering that the Biden-Harris regime has treated the Border Patrol like dirt, the National Border Patrol Council announced Sunday at a campaign rally in Prescott, Arizona, that they were throwing their support behind Donald Trump. Union president Paul Perez minced no words as he eviscerated Kamala Harris for her utter failure to stem the flow of illegal immigrants into the country:

If we allow Border Czar Harris to win this election, every city, every community in this great country, is going to go to hell. The untold millions of people, unvetted, who she has allowed into this country that are committing murders, rapes, robberies, burglaries, and every other crime will continue to put our country in peril.

Only one man can fix that and that is Donald J. Trump. He has always stood with the men and women who protect this border.

Continue reading “”

This is not a coincidence

The Number of Illegal Aliens Dumped Into Swing States Is Jaw-Dropping.

As the 2024 presidential election continues to get closer, new data showing how many illegal aliens have been purposely dumped into crucial swing states by the Biden-Harris administration is raising red flags.

Keen political observers note how the tactic will benefit Democrats.

The numbers come after Democrats on Capitol Hill refused to vote for legislation that would make it against the law for non-citizens to vote in federal elections.

Image

A New Way Forward

Forward

I mean, just how many ways does it take of her making it plain she’s nothing but another Marxist commie before people understand she’s a near perfect exemplar of a domestic enemy of our nation?

It’s already been pointed out how her ‘unburdened by the past’ is Marxist ideology: The Communist Manifesto, Chapter II.

When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character.
Political power, properly so called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another.
If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organise itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.
In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.

The language Harris uses is a modernized version of this Marxist pipe dream.

Nothing unusual from the demoncrap wanna be gun grabbers

Harris Campaign Finally Posts Platform; Biden’s Gun Control Agenda 2.0

The Kamala Harris campaign has finally posted a lengthy platform on its website, just one day ahead of the vice president’s debate with former President Donald Trump, and no surprise here, there’s a gun control section straight out of Joe Biden’s 2020 agenda.

According to the text, “As President, she won’t stop fighting so that Americans have the freedom to live safe from gun violence in our schools, communities, and places of worship. She’ll ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, require universal background checks, and support red flag laws that keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. She will also continue to invest in funding law enforcement, including the hiring and training of officers and people to support them, and will build upon proven gun violence prevention programs that have helped reduce violent crime throughout the country.”

Harris has been a gun control proponents since her days as a California legislator and that state’s attorney general. Indeed, she was the defendant in at least two gun rights lawsuits involving the Second Amendment Foundation and other gun rights groups.

Ironically, the Harris-Walz campaign notes elsewhere on the same platform, “Vice President Harris and Governor Walz believe many fundamental freedoms are at stake in this election.”

That is certainly true, so far as Second Amendment activists are concerned. American gun owners believe their right to keep and bear arms is definitely at stake on Nov. 5.

The Donald Trump campaign, meanwhile, says only this about the Second Amendment, and one might suggests this is all that needs to be said: “Defend our constitution, our bill of rights, and our fundamental freedoms, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to keep and bear arms.” What else needs to be said?

Trump has historically been the only president in recent memory who consistently mentioned the Second Amendment in his stump speeches. The conviction in a New York courtroom cost him his gun rights, but many believe this is going to be short-lived, as some observers expect the convictions to be overturned on appeal.

The Harris campaign will expand voting by mail and early voting, and focus on other rights. But the rights protected by the Second Amendment would undoubtedly be under the same intense attack they have been under Biden.
Harris’ camp is trying to tie Trump to the Project 2025 campaign, but the former president is trying equally hard to distance himself from the conservative effort. Project 2025 is the creation of the Heritage Foundation. According to CNN, Project 2025 involves scores of former Trump administration employees.

The debate Tuesday will allow voters to further compare where each candidate stands on issues.

BLUF
Although the November 2024 election is special because the issues it addresses are fundamental, it is probably wrong to regard its outcome as the End of History any more than 1989 closed the books on human affairs. Rather than being at the end of things, it is a reminder that we are always at the beginning. Gramsci may have captured the castle only to discover the castle itself has moved. Things begin anew. Welcome back to the fight.

Dusk or Dawn?

There is a feeling among some that the November 2024 election is special. It is useful to consider why.

American presidential activities have become increasingly important since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, ushering in a period of U.S. dominance occasionally referred to as The End of History. The Reagan victory marked a moment when the key battlefield in the struggle to determine the future of humanity shifted from the superpower competition between East and West to the simple control of the institutions of the West, following the collapse of the USSR.

Gone was Che Guevara and Mao’s strategy of surrounding the global cities from the Third World countryside. Back was Gramsci’s plan to infiltrate Western institutions and culture from within. If the enemy walls were impregnable from without, they were vulnerable from within. The left accepted the West would be conquered by coup. To this task they set forth with might and main.

But something happened that Gramsci did not expect. As the march through the institutions progressed, the “progressives” — so confident of their intellectual superiority — did not sweep all before them. Rather they found the resistance stiffening unexpectedly. Unlikely coalitions rooted in the “Working Class” and even among formerly left-wing sympathizers began to multiply. The surprise setbacks of 2016, Trump and Brexit, grew rather than declined, as one might expect of the last-gasp resistance in the inevitable tide of history.

Today the Reagan castle the progressives captured by coup is in shambles. They are in possession of a ruin. The Global World has not only shattered but is breaking out in war. The only answer to inflation is price control. Worse, the political opposition to progressive ideas has become assertive and even respectable. Things have come to a head; that is what makes November 2024 so special.

Continue reading “”

Karl Marx and Kamala Harris…
Slightly different words, same message.

Karl Marx was the father of modern-day communism, a philosophy and form of government responsible for the despair, deprivation, and deaths of countless millions of people since the Russian Revolution in 1917.

One of Karl Marx’s many aphorisms addresses the social, educational, and fiscal disparities of classes; he believed the root of all evil was capitalism. Marx argued that the only solution was equity, a social construct that ensures equal outcomes, however low the common denominator must be set to achieve them. Only by abandoning capitalism and embracing equity can a society and its people, according to Karl Marx, “move forward into a future unburdened by what has been.”

Does that quote sound familiar? Surely you’ve heard the modernized version, one that avoids any attribution to Karl Marx: “What can be… unburdened by what has been.” Who’s adopted those words as her wide a-Woke progressive mantra and spreads it at every opportunity?

That’s right… Kamala Harris, America’s very own Karl Marx.

Whoa! Is it possible Kamala Harris isn’t as vapid and intellectually shallow as she lets-on, could she be cloaking her Marxist message in words many people don’t understand? Her supporters clearly don’t, they’re unable to focus on anything beyond their overwhelming obsession with her gender and race, or… perhaps, they just don’t care. It’s very possible the prospect of a socialist… or its ugly stepchild, communist America sounds great to Kamala Harris voters.

That distinct possibility aside, the rest of America mustn’t be fooled by Kamala Harris; like Barack Obama’s promise to “fundamentally change America,” she could be hiding some very insidious intentions in her word-salad message. And unless we understand what Karl Marx meant when he said, “Move forward into a future unburdened by what has been” and what Kamala Harris means when she fantasizes about “What can be… unburdened by what has been,” she’ll continue to feed that message to the American public… until we choke. And when it comes to getting rid of communism… once it blocks our collective airway and starves us of freedom…

No Heimlich Maneuver ever invented will be able to remove it.

Amy Curtis THREAD TIME

THIS what this has ALWAYS been about: guys like Tom spent YEARS forcing milquetoast candidates on us, candidates who didn’t care about the voters they supposedly represented.

So when Trump came along, the fed up electorate turned their backs on the so-called “experts.”

The🐰FOO
@PolitiBunny
Aug 26
A thread where Tom explains why it’s more important to punish the right than save the country from communism.

After the Bush years (yay, endless war and suppressive surveillance state!) they gave us John McCain and Mitt Romney.
Guys who never met a Democrat they wouldn’t compromise with.

“XZY issue isn’t the hill to die on!” screamed guys like Tom and their preferred politicians. Meanwhile, the Left ran roughshod over the political landscape.

“Just shut up and take it!” said guys like Tom. “I’m the expert here!”
After years of this, Trump came along.
Brash, crass, and completely not like the jerks the Washington Generals of Punditry demanded we settle for time and again. It wasn’t perfect, but it was different.

Having been kicked in the head repeatedly by guys like Tom, voters decided to say * it. Why should we listen to pundits who don’t really give a * about anything other than rubbing elbows in DC?”

This made Tom SO MAD. How dare the little people he constantly sneers at defy him!
He’s the EXPERT!
How dare they pretend to know their lives and needs and political preferences better than him!
He wouldn’t set foot in their hometowns, but he knows how to run them!

So rather than take two minutes for some introspection — to realize maybe voters wanted something other than a rehash of Romney or Bush or McCain — Tom lashed out.
“I bear no responsibility for how we got here, even though I’m the self-proclaimed expert!”

Since 2016, the entire raison d’etre of guys like Tom has been to punish the voters for defying him.
That’s it.
He — and many of his cohort and colleagues — are out for revenge.
It’s not more complicated than that.

Tom and friends don’t give a * if you can’t afford food. If you lose private health insurance. If Kamala Harris wrecks the country. In their eyes, we *deserve* it for not obeying them.
They, at least economically, are insulated from it.
This is a middle finger to US.

But the Left — once Tom and crew stop being useful — will destroy them.
The Left always does.
In his conceit and arrogance, Tom thinks he’ll either avoid this by being a good foot soldier or the right will forgive and forget.

We won’t. But we’ll vote for Trump to stop Kamala.And Tom will benefit from that.
He’ll still be a spiteful, ungrateful prick.
But he’ll also continue to enjoy not paying insane capital gains taxes.

My vote for Trump is not *for* him. It’s *against* Kamala and it’s also *against* guys like Tom who — after years of * candidates and “compromises” — STILL think they can tell me how to run my life.
It’s against guys who have the audacity to admit this entire thing is about punishing us for not kissing their rings.

Guys like Tom deserve nothing but contempt and scorn. When Karma comes a-knockin’, it’ll come HARD.

Enjoy it when it does.

Dems Went Hard on Gun Control in a City Where It’s Failed to Slow Violent Crime.

The Democratic National Convention offered voters a double-dose of gun control while the criminal misuse of guns on the street streets of Chicago continues. Nothing in the DNC’s gun control agenda seriously addresses stopping crime. For Vice President Kamala Harris – the Democratic presidential nominee, and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, her running mate – it’s just more punishment for the firearm industry, more restrictions on law-abiding gun owners and nothing to stop criminals.

Sadly, the City of Chicago has led the nation in yearly homicide totals for 13 years running and last weekend tragically saw 30 people shot with five of them losing their lives. Crime is rampant in the Windy City and law enforcement is horribly treated. Citizens are at the mercy of emboldened violent criminals who know that even if they are caught on camera in gunfire exchanges involving police officers, they will get off the hook.

But the DNC is casting a blind eye on those issues. Metal fencing was erected all around the convention site, protestors descended on the city and businesses took proactive steps to board up their windows and doors.

Regarding the official platform, the party of “defund the police” is unsurprisingly doubling down on its belief that law-abiding Americans should have their Constitutional rights infringed, rather than supporting law enforcement and jailing those who commit violent crimes.

The clear message coming from the Chicago is “More gun control!”

Continue reading “”