The only reason we have warning labels is because government officials realized that they personally require them to survive and not accidentally kill themselves.
-unattributed
January 16, 2026

Kamala Harris Buys $8.2 Million Seaside Mansion After Warning ‘Sea Levels Are Rising’ Due to ‘Climate Crisis’
Harris’s new home features many of the same amenities—such as a gas stove and fireplace—that the Biden-Harris administration targeted with regulations
Former vice president Kamala Harris and her husband Doug Emhoff purchased an $8 million mansion in an exclusive oceanside Malibu neighborhood last month. The move came after Harris spent years warning that such communities could be threatened by the “climate crisis.”
A real estate listing for the mansion, reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, says the luxury pad is “perched in a prime coastal location” with “breathtaking ocean views.” The property sits right near a coastline that—according to climate scenarios endorsed by Harris—is at risk of facing extreme flooding. A climate model issued by the Biden-Harris administration determined that Point Dume State Beach, the beach a short walk from Harris’s new property, would be severely damaged by sea level rise even under the model’s most modest projections. The Trump administration discontinued that model in June 2025.
The purchase, which was first reported by the New York Post, calls into question Harris’s earnestness when discussing the threats posed by what she calls the “climate crisis.”
“Our oceans are warming. Sea levels are rising,” Harris wrote during her short-lived presidential campaign in 2019. “Extreme weather is destroying our communities. We are poisoning the planet.”
As a senator, Harris cosponsored the Living Shorelines Act, which called for earmarking $50 million in federal funding a year for combating sea level rise, which threatens “thousands of coastal communities and economies.”


“One of my rules-of-thumb is that anything that can’t be explained with normal words is BS”
-Scott Adams
January 15, 2026
Supreme Court limits dual charges in overlapping gun statutes
WASHINGTON (TNND) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday clarified how federal gun statutes apply when a single act potentially violates two overlapping provisions, holding that prosecutors may not secure separate convictions under both statutes when one act triggers identical criminal elements.
The decision in Barrett v. United States (No. 24-5774) reversed part of a lower court’s judgment and sharply restricts the government’s ability to secure cumulative punishments for a single criminal act involving guns.
Background of the Case
The case stems from the prosecution of Dwayne Barrett, who was convicted in federal district court of robbery and related gun offenses.
According to court documents, Barrett committed a series of robberies between August 2011 and January 2012. During one, Barrett’s confederate shot and killed Gamar Dafalla.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) previously said Barrett, as well as a co-defendant, were convicted in March 2013 of murder, robberies, and gun charges after a two-week jury
During the commission of the underlying crime, Barrett carried and used a gun, conduct that prosecutors charged under two separate provisions of federal law, including one that makes it a crime to use or carry a gun during and in relation to a crime of violence or drug trafficking, as well as other that escalates the penalty where a person causes death while committing an offense, potentially exposing a defendant to life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
At trial and on appeal, the government argued that Barrett could be convicted under both statutes for the same act, essentially treating the gun use that caused Dafalla’s death as a basis for two separate convictions.
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) January 14, 2026
Fort Worth homeowner fatally shot man trying to enter locked garage, police say
A man who lives at an east Fort Worth house confronted a burglar early Monday and shot the intruder to death in response to an aggressive approach, police said.
The shooter heard and saw the burglar, Fabian Abernathy, trying to enter a locked garage on the shooter’s property in the 3400 block of Avenue L, according to Fort Worth police. The homeowner encountered Abernathy about 6 a.m. and told him to leave.
The homeowner fired multiple rounds at Abernathy, shooting him at least once in the torso, police said. Abernathy, who was 47, walked or ran from the house, collapsed and died on the sidewalk at the intersection of Avenue L and Bishop Street.
The shooter called 911 to report the encounter and summon medical personnel. He remained at the house and is cooperating with an investigation, police said. Police have not arrested the shooter.
When global maritime flows evacuate without formal blockade, it confirms operators now price in kinetic action as near-term probable.
This is where capital, cargo, and risk converge to front-run escalation. It is not theory. It is energy in motion.
Five core implications lock:
1. Imminent precision strike window is real
No one abandons Hormuz lightly. This is the world’s most sensitive oil chokepoint. For this many ships to reposition confirms intelligence loops are flashing red. Strategic planners are now assuming the next 48–72 hours are live.
2. Insurance and compliance engines have flipped
Behind the scenes, maritime insurers, underwriters, and compliance desks are triggering “elevated threat protocols.” That only happens when confirmed threat matrices pass the tripwire. This is sovereign-level coordination, not Twitter drama.
3. Liquidity evaporation effect begins now
This freezes energy flow reflexivity. As risk heightens and flows thin, oil spikes, safe havens pump, leverage unwinds, and Bitcoin rises as censorship-exempt capital refuge. The entire global system starts rerouting around the Iranian footprint.
4. This is not a one-off evacuation
This matches the embassy exits, the regime capital flight, the BTC bid, the media dissonance, the STRATCOM drills, and the political chaos signals. Every layer of the system is now behaving as if a sovereign collision is no longer avoidable.
5. The West just blinked and moved out of the way
This withdrawal creates a vacuum. No Western commercial presence. No diplomatic bodies. No major press corps embedded. That means one thing: space has been cleared for direct, asymmetric, or proxy strike action without global human shield friction.
This is the last step before something burns. The ships leaving are physical confirmation that the global nervous system has already made its move. Everyone close to the blast radius has already fled.
That is never random.
🇮🇷 SHIPS BACK OFF IRANIAN PORTS AS STRIKE FEARS GROW
At least 50 commercial vessels have dropped anchor away from Iran’s key ports in the Persian Gulf.
25 are sitting off Bandar Imam Khomeini, and another 25 off Bandar Abbas in the Strait of Hormuz.
Nobody wants to get caught… pic.twitter.com/1YG7e6djSr
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) January 14, 2026
OMG. Doctor REFUSES To Admit Men Can’t Get Pregnant
Sen @HawleyMO: Do you think that men can get pregnant?
Dr. Nisha Verma: I hesitated there because I wasn't sure where the conversation was going or what the goal was…
Hawley: Let me just remind you, you testified a moment… pic.twitter.com/HKtXMzjfA4
— Mr Producer (@RichSementa) January 14, 2026

Carnivores are just as cultish as vegans, but I have yet to see a human barricade of carnivores at the entrance of Whole Foods to stop people from buying veggies.
– unattributed
