Too graphic for the adults but ok for the children. What have we become as a society, Lord? đ€Źđ€Źđ€Ź https://t.co/i2KL7Q8NUX
— Amy Gomez (@amy_gomez10659) October 25, 2023
Category: You Can’t Make This Up
If any doubt remained about the actual existence of ‘crap-for-brains’ Professor Vorenberg’s vacuous statement should dispel it.
California: "The existence of historic laws proves that we should win!"
Also California: "The lack of historic laws proves that we should win!" https://t.co/NfI7Zs4SYe
— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) October 21, 2023
Iâd argue exposing their identities wasnât a failureâit was done on purpose.
— TexasOilRises đșđž (@courtney_ap) October 19, 2023
All your printers are belong to us
Background checks for printer purchases
New bill intro by Assemblywoman Jenifer Rajkumar, A-8132, Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.
From the bill memorandum:
Three-dimensionally printed firearms, a type of untraceable ghost gun, can be built by anyone using an $150 three-dimensional printer.
Three-dimensional printed guns are growing more prevalent each year. There were 100 taken off the streets of New York City in 2019. That number skyrocketed to 637 in 2022.
Concurrently, ghost gun shootings have risen 1,000% across the nation. Currently, three-dimensional printers allow people to make, buy, sell, and use untraceable guns without any background checks.
This bill will require a background check so that three-dimensional printed firearms do not get in the wrong hands.
âGreenâ EV Battery Factory Uses So Much Energy, It Needs Its Own Coal Plant to Power It
In order to keep up with the demands for Democrat President Joe Bidenâs green agenda, a coal-fired power plant is being expanded to cope with the energy needs of an electric vehicle (EV) battery factory.
The $4 billion Panasonic EV battery factory is being constructed in De Soto, Kansas. The new factory will help satisfy the Biden administrationâs efforts to get everyone into an EV. It also will help extend the life of a coal-fired power plant.
The Evergy Power Plant was slated to be decommissioned as part of the push to eliminate fossil fuels. Plans were in place to transition fossil fuel-burning units at the plant to natural gas.
However, plans have now changed as the power plant will now be used to provide energy for the new battery factory. The plant will now be dedicated to burning coal to provide energy for the battery factory. It will also be expanded to cope with the extra demand.
Panasonic broke ground on the facility last year. The Japanese company was slated to receive $6.8 billion from the Democratsâ âInflation Reduction Act.â The legislation has been pouring billions into electric vehicles and battery factories as part of its effort to transition America away from fossil fuels.
The Kansas City Star reports that the factory will require between 200 and 250 megawatts of electricity to operate. Thatâs roughly the amount of power needed for a small city.
In testimony to the Kansas City Corporation Commission, which is the stateâs equivalent of the Wyoming Public Service Commission, a representative of Evergy, the utility serving the factory, said that the 4 million-square-foot Panasonic facility creates ânear term challenges from a resource adequacy perspective,â according to the newspaper.
As a result, the utility will continue to burn coal at a power plant near Lawrence, Kansas, and it will delay plans to transition units at the plant to natural gas.
Environmentalists, meanwhile, are not happy about that. The situation reflects an ignored fact about EVs â they require enormous amounts of energy to produce. Aside from production, the vehicles themselves also require vast amounts of electricity to charge.
A 15-pound lithium-ion battery holds about the same amount of energy as a pound of oil. To make that battery requires 7,000 pounds of rock and dirt to get the minerals that go into that battery. The average EV battery weighs around 1,000 pounds.
All of that mining and factory processing produces a lot more carbon dioxide emissions than a gas-powered car. EVs have to be driven around 50,000 to 60,000 miles before thereâs a net reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
So, as more factories are built in the U.S. to supply EV manufacturers, there will be higher demands on the grid for power.
Yes, there does actually seem to be people this dense and ignorant.
“…shared cultural norms…”
Iâm genuinely confused how a world with globalized media (and shared cultural norms) can existâand yet hundreds of people today felt it was honorable to parade lifeless civilian bodies in the street.
— Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) October 7, 2023
Whatâs Arabic for âchutzpah?â
Rep. Ilhan Omar shockingly called for international protections and support for Palestinians after their fundamentalist terrorist group Hamas carried out a brutal terrorist attack on Israel.
The progressive Minnesota congresswoman expressed her compassion for the people in the Palestinian enclave of the Gaza Strip amid widespread criticism for her and her colleagues’ response to the violence.
‘Reminder, Gaza doesn’t have shelters or an iron dome and to please pray for them,’ Omar wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter. ‘May peace prevail in the region and move us towards a moral awakening to care about the human suffering we are seeing.’
‘Palestinians are human beings who have been in besieged and are deserving of protection from the international community,’ she added.
Omar is one of the two first Muslim women to be elected to Congress â joined by Palestinian-American Rep. Rashida Tlaib, who has remained noticeably silent on the recent terrorist attack.
Largest EV Charging Station In World Powered By Diesel-Powered Generators.
The Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger station is an impressive beast. With 98 charging bays, the facility in Coalinga, California, is the largest charging station in the world. But to provide that kind of power takes something solar canât provide â diesel generators.

The Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger station is an impressive beast. With 98 charging bays, the facility in Coalinga, California, is the largest charging station in the world.
In 2017, Tesla CEO said that all Superchargers in the automakerâs network were being converted to solar.
âOver time, almost all will disconnect from the electricity grid,â Musk posted on X, formally known as Twitter.
Superchargers charge vehicles up to the 80% sweet spot in as little as 20 minutes, but to provide that kind of power for nearly 100 bays takes something solar canât provide â diesel generators.
Investigative journalist Edward Niedermeyer discovered that the station was powered by diesel generators hidden behind a Shell station. Reporters at SF Gate tried to find out how much of the station’s electricity was from the generators, but couldnât get a response from Tesla.
The station isnât connected to any dedicated solar farms, which means that absent the diesel generators, the station is powered by Californiaâs grid.
PELOSI: "If you have a difference of opinion, you just can't be impeaching!"
âThis is a fake distraction!â
pic.twitter.com/f09LzgdCHM— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 26, 2023
NY Man Arrested With $1.6 Million In Fentanyl Fails To Show For Court After Being Granted Non-Cash Bail https://t.co/MUSDn2EJ3R
— zerohedge (@zerohedge) September 23, 2023
Never, ever place any trust in “The Internet of Things” “IOT”
BLUF
If we ponder that relationship for a moment, we might conclude that many of the things that we believe we control are really on loan as a means of controlling us.
On Thursday, May 25, Brandon Jackson, a software engineer in Baltimore County, Maryland, discovered that he was locked out of his Amazon account. Jackson couldnât get packages delivered to his home by the retail giant. He couldnât access any files and data he had stored with Amazon Web Services, the companyâs powerful cloud computing wing. It also meant that Jackson, a self-described home automation enthusiast, could no longer use Alexa for his smart home devices. He could turn on his lights manually, but only in the knowledge that Amazon could still operate them remotely.
Jackson soon discovered that Amazon suspended his account because a Black delivery driver whoâd come to his house the previous day had reported hearing racist remarks from his video doorbell. In a brief email sent to Jackson at 3 a.m., the company explained how it unilaterally placed all of his linked devices and services on hold as it commenced an internal investigation.
The accusations baffled Jackson. He and his family are Black. When he reviewed the doorbellâs footage, he saw that nobody was home at the time of the delivery. At a loss for what could have prompted the accusation of racism, he suspected the driver had misinterpreted the doorbellâs automated response: âExcuse me, can I help you?â
Submitting the surveillance video âappeared to have little impact on [Amazonâs] decision to disable my account,â Jackson explained on his blog on June 4. âIn the end, my account was unlocked on Wednesday [May 31, six days later], with no follow-up to inform me of the resolution.â By now, many months later, Amazonâs investigation into the matter appears to have concluded though the issue remains far from resolved. Contacted for a response, the company wrote: âIn this case, we learned through our investigation that the customer did not act inappropriately, and weâre working directly with the customer to resolve their concerns while also looking at ways to prevent a similar situation from happening again.â
It was only Jacksonâs technical skills and particular automated home setup that saved him from what could have been a larger lockout. âââMy home was fine as I just used Siri or [a] locally hosted dashboard if I wanted to change a lightâs color or something of that nature,â he explained. His week of digital exile amounted to a frustrating inconvenience only because, as a tech-savvy user and professional software engineer, he had the ability to set up his own locally hosted network that acted as a failsafe. But Jacksonâs experience is a warning to the vast majority of Alexa users and smart home dwellers who, lacking his particular skills and foresight, are increasingly at the mercy of the tech they have embedded into their lives and bedrooms.
âI came forward,â Jackson told Tablet, âbecause I donât think itâs right that Amazon could say, âI know you bought all these devices, but we think you are racist. So weâre going to take [you] offline.ââ On one side, critics lambasted Jackson as a dupe for having smart devices in the first place; others said his criticisms of Amazon implied that he didnât support a company protecting its employees. âPeople missed the main point,â he said. âI donât really care who you are, what you do, or what you believe in. If you bought something, you should own it.â
Jacksonâs story of being temporarily canceled by the tech behemoth spread across the internet after it was discussed in a YouTube video by Louis Rossman, a right-to-repair activist, independent technician, and popular YouTube personality. Right to repair, or fair repair, is a consumer-focused movement advocating for the public to be able to repair the equipment they own instead of being forced to use the manufacturerâs repair services or upgrade products that have been arbitrarily made obsolete. In the early 20th century, fair-repair advocacy began with automobiles and heavy machinery, but its tenets have spread as computer chips have come to undergird contemporary life.
Following Rossmanâs initial video about Jackonsâs case, Amazon alleged that Rossman had abused its affilate marketing program and placed restrictions on the YouTuberâs business account, leading him to speculate in a follow-up video that the corporate giant was retaliating against him for covering Jacksonâs travails. Rossman alleges that this was the first time Amazon made any allegation against him of abusing its affiliate marketing program since he enrolled in the marketing program 7.5 years ago.
Jacksonâs experience is a warning to Alexa users and smart home dwellers who are increasingly at the mercy of the tech they have embedded into their lives and bedrooms.
The number of households adopting smart home devices in the United States is expected to reach 93 million by 2027 and most consumers rely on cloud services for their daily online use. But the cloud is not just a metaphor to explain a connected network; it describes the complete reorganization of digital life under the power of remote centralized databases. Light switches, lightbulbs, locks, thermostats, coffee makers, air conditioners, speakers, exercise equipment, and virtually every other piece of equipment you can find in the average home can now all be operated as interconnected pieces of a single digital network, run by an outside host, such as Amazon, which operates the massive server banks that make up âthe cloud.â For consumers, this arrangement offers convenience and optimization. You can turn on the heat in your house from another state, or reorder a household good with a simple voice command. But the cost of that convenience is that consumers no longer independently control how their techâor their homes, since the two are increasingly integratedâis operated. As Kyle Wiens, CEO of iFixit and another right-to-repair activist put it, âWho really owns our things? It used to be us.â

Brandon Jackson
Alexaâs terms of use includes a clause stating that Amazon is permitted to terminate âaccessâ to Alexa at the companyâs discretion without notice. Jackson was told by a customer relations executive over the phone that he needed to assure the company that he would not ridicule or put future delivery drivers in harmâs way. Nearly a month later, Amazon admitted no wrongdoing, only apologizing for âinconveniences.â Given absolute power over its users, there is no pressure on Amazon to explain its decision. Indeed, the company used the same statement Tabletreceived for an earlier June Newsweek article regarding Jacksonâs lockout.
Amazonâs claims of being concerned about the safety of blue-collar workers strain credibility. According to a 2021 article published in Vice, when minority delivery drivers faced violent threats and racial harassment, the companyâs penchant for efficiency took priority over worker safety. Unsustainable demands from delivery drivers have translated to drivers peeing in bottles and defecating in garbage bags, a problem Amazon internally acknowledged even as it publicly denies the allegations. Inside its âfulfillment centersââthe term the company uses for its warehousesâworkers suffer 5.9 serious injuries for every 100 workers, an 80% greater injury rate than competitors. Indeed employee turnover is so high in these facilities that a leaked company memo from 2022 warned that the company was on track to deplete its number of available workers by 2024.
Amazonâs intrusion into Jacksonâs life, then, should not be understood within the context of protecting workersâwhich might begin by giving them adequate time to use the restroomâbut rather as part of an emergent regime of technological control. The culmination of years of debate about political and civic norm moderation on social media and in public discourse has created a new normative standard in which âinnocent until proven guiltyâ is now viewed as an oppressive and antiquated relic. As the new unelected masters of public discourse, tech giants like Amazon, Google, Twitter, and Facebook, have been encouraged to execute summary punishments of users for mere accusations of racism or âdisinformation.â
Amazonâs enormous power in the global economy and ubiquitous presence in the U.S. supply chain and cloud computing sectors allows the company to take the power of surveillance and cancellation even further. Unlike purely social media companies like X (formerly known as Twitter), Amazonâs suite of smart home gadgets and services gives it a direct physical presence inside of peopleâs homes. That means that when Amazon wades into cultural issues, or decides to punish people based on offensive speech, its political values are mapped onto objects and processes used in the real world.
In Jacksonâs case, in order to regain access to things he had already paid for, he was forced to submit the surveillance video from his home to Amazon to prove his innocence. Somehow, in the new cloud-based networked world these corporations are building for us, the solution to every problem always involves individuals handing over more of their private data.
Debates over censorship, free speech and its limits typically revolve around social media use. But Hayley Tsukayama, a senior legislative activist for Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group, suggested to Tablet that Jacksonâs case shared a similar architecture to conversations around content moderation. Companies can choose not to allow certain forms of speech, but in doing so they can no longer be treated as neutral platforms. Tsukayama argues that social media users are offered a recourse, even if the process is stacked against them. âIf [Amazon] is going to look at customer behavior as being part of the terms of service,â she said, âthey [should] make that clear and set up a process thatâs perhaps not unlike what we see at Facebook, YouTube or others who deal with content takedown.â
But, of course, we now know that millions of social media users had their accounts censored or banned without explanation or recourse for posts, including many that were classified as âdisinformationâ at the time of the alleged offense but contained statements that authorities later acknowledged as true. In that light, placing more trust in a content moderation model seems like a dangerous gamble. It could also lead to even more surveillance online as companies like Amazon claim a need to monitor their customersâ every move so they can judge them âfairly.â
Like many digital technologies, the smart home offers connectivity at a steep priceâit makes individuals passive subjects of the products that surround them, including the things they own. Few of us have any real understanding of the âterms of serviceâ on the devices and services that we rely on. Consider how streaming services replaced physical media and how the arrival of smartphones, with all their wonders, also meant that the owners of such phones became incapable of replacing their own batteries, SIM cards, and physical storage. If we ponder that relationship for a moment, we might conclude that many of the things that we believe we control are really on loan as a means of controlling us.
America, this is what Joe Biden really thinks of you, pay attention.
— Charles Lee 1911 (@Charles07788205) September 15, 2023
The U.S. Navy confirmed on Tuesday it has discontinued an online recruiting initiative featuring an enlisted drag queen that was aimed at bringing new sailors into the service.
In May, The Daily Caller revealed that the Navy brought on Yeoman 2nd Class Joshua Kelley â an active-duty drag queen who goes by the stage name Harpy Daniels and identifies as non-binary â to be a âNavy Digital Ambassador.â The Digital Ambassador Pilot Program, which ran from October 2022 to March 2023, was reportedly âdesigned to explore the digital environment to reach a wide range of potential candidatesâ for military recruitment.
In a letter sent to Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., on Tuesday, Erik Raven, the under secretary of the Navy, confirmed that the branchâs Digital Ambassador Pilot Program âwill not be continued.â
âThe Navy learned lessons from the pilot program that will inform our digital engagement and outreach going forward,â Raven wrote. âOur digital outreach efforts will maintain the important distinction between Sailorsâ official activities and their personal lives.â
Tuberville â who sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee â previously sent a letter to Admiral Michael M. Gilday, the chief of Naval Operations, in May, demanding to know the identities of the officers tasked with funding and promoting drag queen shows aboard naval vessels. The letter was sent the same day the Alabama senator and his Republican colleagues submitted a separate communique to Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro on the branchâs embrace of Daniels and whether Navy leadership is encouraging its âdigital ambassadorsâ and public affairs personnel to use TikTok â which the Pentagon banned its members from using on government-issued devices â âon their personal devicesâ in order to skirt the agencyâs prohibition.
In his Tuesday letter to Tuberville, Raven claimed the Navy followed existing guidelines restricting the use of TikTok and that while some sailors partaking in the digital ambassador program âhad [a] personal social media presence on TikTok,â the branch did not issue government devices for purposes of participating in the venture. Raven further contended the branch will âcontinue to communicateâ to its members the ânational security risks associated with their use of TikTok on personal devices.â
The U.S. Army and Coast Guard are also expected to miss their respective fiscal year 2023 recruiting targets.

BLUF:
“We welcomed you. We created nonprofits to help feed, clothe, find housing. We did everything we could to make your transition here easier, and this is how you repay us, by stabbing us in the back?â
Though Democrats have blamed conservative Republicans for the growing outcry from the Muslim community over the radical LGBTQ agenda being forced on children in public schools, the belief still exists among woke leftists that if they continue to play nice they can coexist withâand win overâdevoutly religious, socially conservative Muslims who have become disaffected with Democratic Party.
From the Washington Postâs report:
And last year, a Muslim who emigrated from Yemen as a teenager became mayor â the cityâs first leader in nearly a century with no Polish roots â alongside what is believed to be the nationâs only all-Muslim city council.
Many residents in this tiny enclave just north of downtown Detroit saw these changes as a sign of the Hamtramckâs progressiveness. The Muslim community that had previously experienced discrimination, including voter intimidation and resistance to mosquesâ public call to prayer, had finally taken its seats at the table.
Yet the ethnic, cultural and religious diversity that made Hamtramck something of a model is being put severely to the test. In June, after divisive debate, the six-member council blocked the display of Pride flags on city property â action that has angered allies and members of the LGBTQ+ community, who feel that the support they provided the immigrant groups has been reciprocated with betrayal.
âWe welcomed you,â former council member Catrina Stackpoole, a retired social worker who identifies as gay, recalls telling the council this summer. âWe created nonprofits to help feed, clothe, find housing. We did everything we could to make your transition here easier, and this is how you repay us, by stabbing us in the back?â
The only flags that can be displayed on city property, per the WaPoâs report, are âU.S., state, city and POW/MIA banners.â
My first thought when I read this was âWhat the heck did they expect?â My second was to remind myself that the far left always expects mindless subservience from their core voting blocs.
Though there seemed to be general agreement from Twitter conservatives with the vote to only allow the American flag and related flags on city property, some other observations were made about the widening political rift in Hamtramck which ranged from serious to downright hilarious:
BREAKING: New Mexico Governor says she is amending her executive order to allow open and concealed carry (except in public parks and playgrounds) due to the "debate in court"
— Firearms Policy Coalition (@gunpolicy) September 15, 2023
If we exclude food, energy, and shelter inflation is doing great.đ© https://t.co/BLIm1mhDrx
— Rangermonk (@rangermonk1) September 15, 2023
Do NOT read any farther. If you please, comment on what you see wrong with the cover.

Pearl Harbor: A Date of Infamy: December 7th, 1941
Really……………………………
Comment O’ The Day Continue reading “”
Firearms Policy Coalition @gunpolicy

Joe Biden was in Hanoi on Sunday, meeting with Vietnam’s Communist Party leader, General Secretary Nguyá» n PhĂș Trá»ng.
After the meeting, he made some remarks and took a few questions from the press. We probably don’t even have to say anymore that it didn’t go well, you can just assume that there are going to be big embarrassing issues.
Biden started in confusion about whether it was evening there (it was).
BIDEN: "Good evening, everyone. It is evening, isn't it? This around the world in five days is interesting. Well, one of my staff members said, 'Remember the famous song, Good Morning, Vietnam?' Well, good evening, Vietnam." pic.twitter.com/PjvBtiVcLN
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 10, 2023
I think he was trying to make a joke about “Good Morning, Vietnam,” which was a famous Robin Williams movie, not a “famous song.” And maybe that’s not the best movie to bring up when you’re in Vietnam. As my colleague Andrew Malcolm observed in his post about Joe Biden’s visit, Biden said his Afghanistan withdrawal would not be as bad as the Saigon panic, but then it was.
But that was the good part. It was all downhill from there once the presser started. Although to be fair, it’s not much of a presser when he limits it to five preselected reporters that “they gave me here.”
