Tommy Gun Chambered In 30-06 Springfield

tommy gun chambered in 30 06 springfield

The Thompson submachine gun is undoubtedly one of the most iconic SMGs of the 20th century, which proved to be an extremely effective tool whether used as a broom in the trenches of WW2 or a typewriter on the streets of Chicago. No wonder they decided to further explore the potential of its design and developed a version chambered in .30-06 Springfield. This one-of-a-kind experimental Tommy Gun in 30-06 is consigned to the upcoming December 2025 Rock Island Premier Firearms Auction.

Designed in 1943 by Auto Ordnance Corp, this beast is a select-fire rifle with a 23-inch barrel and weighing 17 pounds unloaded. It is based on a Model 1928 Thompson SMG and appears to be built on a standard trigger housing. The upper receiver is four inches longer than a standard SMG receiver to accommodate the much longer cartridge and magazines. The gun uses BAR magazines modified to hold oil pads.

Continue reading “”

Libertarian Agentine President Milei Expands Gun Rights

There is a problem here in the United States, and that’s if liberty were to fall here, there’s nowhere to go. There’s no escape route for those of us who don’t want the government to take everything from us, up to and including our guns, which is why so many of us have a line in the sand that cannot be crossed.

And I don’t see there being anywhere to go anytime soon. Too many other nations that are supposedly free really aren’t, and the trend internationally is for more regulation of everything and a complete and total lack of gun rights.

But Argentina might well be shifting in a more pleasing direction as President Javier Milei has just made a move that looks downright American.

Argentine President Javier Milei has officially authorized civilians to purchase and possess semi-automatic rifles, lifting a ban imposed in 1990.

The new resolution, approved by the government on Wednesday, establishes a control system based on sporting justification and traceability, replacing the broad prohibition with a set of requirements for obtaining a special permit.

The new requirements for civilian ownership include a specific identification of the semi-automatic rifle a person intends to acquire; the person must possess a registered G2-type storage area—a secure, certified system approved by the National Arms Registry—and a sworn statement detailing the specific grounds for the application, accompanied by supporting documentation and photographs of the material.

This reform directly replaces a 1990s decree issued during the administration of former President Carlos Menem, who ruled from 1989 to 1999.

That decree had largely prevented civilians from acquiring semi-automatic rifles unless explicitly authorized by the Ministry of Defense.

In June, the Milei government took the initial step by repealing the Menem-era decree.

Continue reading “”

More stand your ground lies

Since the Trayvon Martin case—my home blog Martin case archive is here–the racial grievance industry has endlessly claimed “stand your ground”—SYG—laws allow white racists to murder innocent blacks at will. Never mind that SYG was not implicated in that case and that neither the prosecution nor the defense raised it. An unmistakable case of self-defense, the local prosecutor refused to prosecute. So racially charged was the political atmosphere, then Florida AG Pam Bondi appointed a corrupt special prosecutor who lost the case.

The anti-liberty/gun industry continues to lie about SYG laws, and the Wall Street Journal has jumped on the creaky bandwagon:

 

The premise of the WSJ story is that Stand Your Ground laws have led to a 59% increase in the number of justifiable homicides in some states between 2019 and 2024, and that the law is allowing some folks to literally get away with murder.

As we discussed yesterday, though, none of the anecdotal cases cited by WSJ in support of that premise are slam dunk examples of murders that were deemed justified as a result of SYG laws. The data set used by the paper is also suspect, since it did not include the significant number of states where Stand Your Ground exists in common law but not specifically in statute.

The WSJ is, at least, misleading:

Even using the WSJ’s own flawed dataset, the percentage of homicides deemed justified in SYG states has climbed from about 2.8% in 2019 to 3.8% in 2024. We don’t know how many self-defense claims were raised in the 96.2% of homicides that were deemed murder, but we know the number isn’t “zero.” Stand Your Ground laws aren’t a “get-out-of-jail free” card for armed citizens, despite the slanted reporting from the WSJ and Gifffords’ wild suggestion that many or all of these justifiable homicides are actually murder.

Just because a state has a SYG law doesn’t mean SYG is implicated in every murder or justified instance of self-defense. All SYG laws do is remove any legal requirement that people unlawfully attacked run away before defending themselves. If they are legally present when and where attacked, they may “stand their ground” and defend themselves.  That’s it. The legal criteria for the use of deadly force remain, and the good guys, not Democrat’s criminal constituency, have the advantage.

Keep in mind I’m not an attorney. I’m providing only general information available by reading the use of force statues of most states. Visiting attorney Andrew Branca’s Law of Self Defense site is also helpful.

Generally, one may use deadly force if a reasonable person in like circumstances would believe they are facing an imminent threat of serious bodily injury or death. Whether those elements are fulfilled is the job of the police to determine. No detective is going to simply take a defender’s word for it.

They’ll exhaustively interview all witnesses. They’ll find and collect all video from the area—almost everything is recorded these days. They’ll determine if the defender’s account is supported by physical and forensic evidence. They’re required to investigate every unattended death, even if it initially appears to be an obvious case of self-defense, as a murder until they can conclusively prove otherwise.

In the Martin case, that’s just what they did and discovered George Zimmerman was telling the truth. Ambushed out of the dark by Martin, who broke his nose, knocking Zimmerman to the ground and straddling him. Ruthlessly beating him in “MMA ground and pound” fashion as a witness recounted, Martin repeatedly beat Zimmerman’s head on a concrete sidewalk. Unable to defend himself, Zimmerman managed to draw his legally carried handgun. One round ended the attack.

Would a reasonable person in Zimmerman’s position, pinned to the ground and being viciously beaten, unable to fight back, believe he was facing serious bodily injury or death? The jury, applying Florida law, thought so and so should any reasonable person.

SYG didn’t apply because Zimmerman couldn’t run even if he wanted to. All the evidence supported Zimmerman’s account.

Claiming people can “shoot first and ask questions later” or all people have to say is “I feared for my life officer,” and that SYG laws require nothing more is either a complete misunderstanding of the law or an outright lie. In the Martin case, that lie tried to further anti-white racism. Now, Giffords and the WSJ are trying to deprive Americans of their Second Amendment rights and necessary legal protections, which would only worsen criminal violence.

Both are as predictable as they are despicable.

Having a fuller understanding of what makes up a large part of our history can give us a fuller understanding of what makes up a large part of who we are today.



logo

Itiner-e: A high-resolution dataset of roads of the Roman Empire

Abstract

The Roman Empire’s road system was critical for structuring the movement of people, goods and ideas, and sustaining imperial control. Yet, it remains incompletely mapped and poorly integrated across sources despite centuries of research.

We present Itiner-e, the most detailed and comprehensive open digital dataset of roads in the entire Roman Empire. It was created by identifying roads from archaeological and historical sources, locating them using modern and historical topographic maps and remote sensing, and digitising them with road segment-level metadata and certainty categories.

The dataset nearly doubles the known length of Roman roads through increased coverage and spatial precision, and reveals that the location of only 2.737% are known with certainty. This resource is transformative for understanding how mobility shaped connectivity, administration, and even disease transmission in the ancient world, and for studies of the millennia-long development of terrestrial mobility in the region.

“I always consider the settlement of America with reverence and wonder, as the opening of a grand scene and design in providence, for the illumination of the ignorant and the emancipation of the slavish part of mankind all over the earth.” – John Adams

Bloombutt may never go broke, but at least making him use his own cash instead of ours is better.


After Trump Cuts BSCA Funds to Anti-Gun Orgs, Bloomberg’s Everytown Steps in to Fill the Void.

Washington’s swamp never runs out of ways to waste your money. But this time, for once, a major artery of anti-gun spending has been cut off — and gun owners have reason to breathe a little easier.

The Trump Administration has officially ended millions in federal grants created under John Cornyn’s Bipartisan Safer Communities Act — a law that gun owners across the country warned from day one would become a backdoor gun-control slush fund.

The cuts hit the so-called Community Violence Intervention and Prevention Initiative, a DOJ program Cornyn helped create with Biden in 2022. CVIPI’s stated mission sounds harmless enough — “supporting community-based solutions to reduce gun violence.” But in practice, it became a pipeline of taxpayer cash flowing straight into organizations that push red flag gun confiscation, “ghost gun” bans, and gun tracing programs that amount to backdoor registration.

The CVIPI Problem

When Cornyn and his Democrat allies rammed through the BSCA, they sold it to gun owners as “fundamentally important to the country.” In reality, it pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into Washington bureaucracies and “community-based organizations” with political ties to the gun control lobby, much like a domestic USAID-style money laundering scheme.

These were the same groups working hand-in-hand with anti-gun legislators in blue states to advance red flag laws, promote so-called “untraceable gun” bans, and build databases of firearm ownership under the guise of “tracing.” In other words, the federal government was bankrolling the civilian disarmament industrial complex.

That’s why Texas Gun Rights fought Cornyn’s BSCA from day one. We warned that once the money started flowing, it would end up in the pockets of the same radical organizations that hate the Second Amendment. And we were right.

Cui Bono?

Recipients of Cornyn’s CVIPI funds included groups openly advocating for gun-control frameworks. Organizations like Youth ALIVE! and others in California publicly promote red flag laws and tracing mandates. Others, like Cure Violence Global and Chicago CRED, work hand-in-hand with state officials to support “public health” approaches to gun ownership that treat the Second Amendment as a disease.

Now, the Trump Administration has finally put an end to this taxpayer-funded nonsense, slashing off millions that were funneled into these anti-gun operations.

Enter Everytown, Bloomberg’s Cash Machine

Of course, billionaire Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety couldn’t stand to see their allies lose funding. Within weeks of the cuts, Everytown announced they were funneling over $2 million into “community organizations” that lost their CVIPI money.

Let that sink in. The same organization that’s spent years lobbying for gun bans, “red flag” confiscation laws, and national gun registration is now handpicking and financing the exact same groups that had been feasting on your tax dollars.

So when the DOJ says CVIPI is about “violence prevention,” it’s worth asking: if Bloomberg’s Everytown is funding the same recipients, what kind of “prevention” are we really talking about?

Why It Matters

Gun owners know what “red flag” laws mean — confiscation without due process. We know what “ghost gun” bans mean — criminalizing home-built firearms and hobbyists. And we know what “gun tracing” means — a federal backdoor registry waiting to happen.

All of it is unconstitutional. All of it is dangerous. And all of it was made possible by John Cornyn’s partnership with Joe Biden on the BSCA. The same BSCA that gave the ATF its “engaged in the business” rule — a sweeping new power that treats ordinary Americans as gun dealers, forcing them into a de facto universal gun registration scheme.

Fighting Back

Thankfully, there are fighters ready to undo Cornyn’s damage. Congressman Wesley Hunt has announced plans to file legislation repealing every shred of gun control from the BSCA. And Attorney General Ken Paxton is in the trenches suing the ATF to shut down its unconstitutional “engaged in the business” rule.

That rule never passed Congress. It was enabled by the BSCA, and it’s being wielded to destroy the private sale of firearms in America. Meanwhile, Cornyn is dodging the cameras and pretending none of this ever happened, as if Texans have forgotten that he gave Biden his biggest gun control win in 30 years.

We haven’t.

The No-Compromise Truth

This is why Texas Gun Rights exists — not to please politicians, but to hold them accountable when they betray gun owners. We don’t compromise with gun control. We expose it, dismantle it, and fight it tooth and nail. Whether it comes from Biden, Bloomberg, or a “Republican” senator from Texas — the result is the same: our freedoms are under attack.

And we’ll never stop fighting to defend them. Because at the end of the day, you shouldn’t have to sacrifice your safety or your rights to satisfy the swamp. Not in Texas. Not anywhere.

 

Chris McNutt is president of Texas Gun Rights.

How Richmond Is Rewriting the Story of Gun Violence — One Student at a Time

““There is no public safety without guns. If guns didn’t exist, yes,” said Ra-Twoine Fields. “But we live in America, where there are more guns than people. So no, there is no public safety without guns. What we can do is learn how to manage it, how to live with it responsibly.”

Fields, a firearms instructor, armed security guard, and PhD student at Saybrook University is also the founder of The Holistic Agency and Crenius, two initiatives linking creative expression, public safety, and community healing. Crenius channels art into civic engagement; The Holistic Agency takes a culturally informed approach to defensive, medical, and mental-health training, treating self-protection and wellness as parts of the same system.

He doesn’t speak for shock value. This is the foundation of his work: teaching young people not to fear the world they live in, but to survive it safely.

Fields helps lead Control the Narrative, his philosophy for harm reduction and violence prevention in Richmond. The approach is rooted in community-violence intervention (CVI) meeting those most at risk where they are, interrupting retaliation, and connecting them to counseling, job training, and other supports. He’s adapted those principles locally through The Holistic Agency’s Weapons Program, a five-week course for teens in Henrico County and Richmond who have already encountered the justice system.

The goal isn’t punishment. It’s understanding why they carry and helping them imagine a life where they don’t have to.

 

Continue reading “”

 2023 data: Other causes of death to minors are still more than firearms.


Continue reading “”

 Alleged yuppie jihadis, 19, from Montclair, NJ, plotted Boston bombing-style attack, planned to join ISIS: feds

Two upper-crust student athletes from tony Montclair, New Jersey, are accused of participating in an ISIS-inspired terror ring — with one of the suspects allegedly plotting a Boston bombing-style attack, the feds said Wednesday.

Tomas Kaan Jimenez-Guzel and Milo Sedarat, both 19, were arrested on Tuesday, with both teens living in $1 million-plus Victorian houses in the manicured New York City suburb.

The accused yuppie jihadis both grew up in privilege before allegedly turning to ISIS.

Milo Sedarat holding up a red, white, and black Air Jordan sneaker.
Tomas Kaan Jimenez-Guzal and Milo Sedarat (above), both 19, were arrested Tuesday and charged with attempting to provide material support to a foreign terrorist group.

Jimenez-Guzel’s mother, Meral Guzel, serves as head of the United Nation’s Women’s Entrepreneurship program, and Sedarat’s father, Roger Sedarat, is an award-winning Iranian American poet and a professor at Queens College in New York City.

Guzel has been with the UN for more than a decade working on women empowerment projects, according to her LinkedIn account, with the mother previously working in the finance sector.

Roger Sedarat, who teaches poetry and literary translation for Queens College’s MFA program, is best known for his works celebrating the written history of his father’s native Iran and Persian poetry.

Neither parent could be reached for comment on Wednesday.

Continue reading “”

SCOTUS Slates Several More 2A Cases for Consideration in Conference

The Supreme Court has already granted cert to two separate cases dealing with Second Amendment issues, and I think there’s a strong possibility the justices will agree to hear at least one more 2A-related challenge this term.

So far the Court has decided to address the constitutionality of Hawaii’s “vampire rule” prohibiting concealed carry on private property unless expressly allowed by the property owner and the federal law barring unlawful users of drugs from possessing firearms, but next week the justices will also consider four cases in conference that all have to do with the Second Amendment rights of 18-to-20-year-olds.

The lawsuits involve challenges to the federal prohibition on handgun sales to adults under 21, Florida’s law banning all gun sales to under-21s, and Pennsylvania’s ban on concealed carry for under-21s (which turns into a total prohibition on carry for young adults when the state’s open carry law is suspended during a state of emergency).

Given the circuit court splits on the issue, I believe there’s a real possibility the Court will hear one or more of these cases. But there are other live issues pending before Court, and the November 21 conference will feature almost a half-dozen of them.

Four of the cases slated for the November 21 conference are prohibited persons cases; not challenges to Section 922(g)(3) and its ban on unlawful drug users owning guns, but taking on 922(g)(1)’s prohibition on gun ownership for anyone who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by more than one year’s imprisonment; and 922(g)(5)(A), which bars unlawful aliens from possessing firearms.

In addition, the Court has scheduled Duncan v. Bonta for its November 21 conference. That’s the challenge to California’s ban on so-called “large capacity” magazines. The Ninth Circuit has upheld the law, including the provision requiring existing owners to destroy their magazines, turn them over to law enforcement, permanently modify them to comply with California’s 10-round limit, or remove them from the state.

The appeals court, though, has stayed enforcement of that portion of the law. If the Supreme Court denies cert, it’s almost guaranteed that the Ninth Circuit would lift that stay and California could start prosecuting anyone found in possession of “large capacity” magazines, even if they lawfully purchased them.

I’d love for the Court to hear each and every one of these cases, but that’s not a realistic possibility. The Court could end up holding on to one or more of these cases pending the outcome in Wolford v. Lopez and U.S. v. Hemani, though I don’t know that either of those cases would have much of an impact on the constitutionality of California’s mag ban.

In one final bit of SCOTUS news, the lead attorney challenging Hawaii’s “vampire rule” in Wolford v. Lopez is asking for help from gun owners in order to “pay for historians, documents, affidavits, and the mountain of legal costs” associated with a Supreme Court challenge. If you’d like to help attorney Alan Beck and the plaintiffs in Wolford, you can contribute to a GiveSendGo campaign. As of Wednesday afternoon Beck had raised nearly $40,000 of his $65,000 goal, and more than 400 patriots have contributed to the cause. Hopefully we can add to the number of donors and fully fund the campaign so that Beck can deliver the strongest arguments possible in the upcoming round of briefing and oral arguments next year.