These people want to take your Gas Stoves and ovens.
Gas for me, not for thee. https://t.co/Nocmosfoje— JNovy "Battling Mediocrity" (@Crypto_Cocktail) November 24, 2023
Category: Econut O’ The Day
Climate hoax falling apart as Earth not warming as predicted by (junk) climate models.
Hoaxers now blaming plants for absorbing more CO2 than imagined.https://t.co/mLBPOoZiJa pic.twitter.com/DiqoLNuzc4
— Steve Milloy (@JunkScience) November 18, 2023
The absurdity of green energy is tipping the scale.đ€Łđ€Łđ€Ł pic.twitter.com/NibEOvNYre
— I Meme Therefore I Am đșđž (@ImMeme0) October 26, 2023
A New Report Throws Cold Water on Man-Made Global Warming Pseudoscience
âTo what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?â may prove to be the most important scientific paper in the last 10 years.
Statistics Norway just published a bomb-shell of a paper that offers a real analysis of global temperatures. The English translation of the paper is available HERE, and is well worth looking at for anyone interested in the facts behind global temperature trends.
Well, this is awkward. Statistics Norway, aka Statistisk sentralbyrĂ„ or âthe national statistical institute of Norway and the main producer of official statisticsâ, has just published a paper âTo what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?â
The awkward part isnât trying to grasp the subtleties of Norwegian since itâs also available in English. Itâs that the Abstract bluntly declares that âstandard climate models are rejected by time series data on global temperaturesâ while the conclusions state âthe results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations.â
But the really awkward part is that a paper from a government agency dares to address openly so many questions the alarmist establishment has spent decades declaring taboo, from the historical record on climate to the existence of massive uncertainty among scientists on it.
What the Norwegians did was conduct statistical analyses of observed and reconstructed temperature series and test whether the recent fluctuation in temperatures differs systematically from previous temperature cycles potentially due to the emission of greenhouse gases. For example, the researchers gathered all the data from various sources, including those related to the four previous glacial and inter-glacial periods, and did a statistical analysis to see how more recent Global Climate Models (GCMs) compare.
In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations. Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a âwarmingâ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes.
The length of the observed time series is consequently of crucial importance for analyzing empirically the pattern of temperature fluctuations and to have any hope of distinguishing natural variations in temperatures from man-made ones. Fortunately, many observed temperature series are significantly longer than 100 years and in addition, as mentioned above, there are reconstructed temperature series that are much longer.
I was recently discussing the fact that Earth is warming from its last glaciation period. The Norwegian statisticiansâ comprehensive temperature review takes the long view into account by looking at the last 420,000 years.
War. On. Oil. Gas prices will go up. Guaranteed. They are laser-focused on maximum pain at the pump to punish you for Climate Sins. It literally is a religion to them. https://t.co/k0le4p0FqX
— colovion (@Colovion) October 14, 2023
Recognize. pic.twitter.com/arOPpNxg1R
— Phat Brain (@brain_phat) October 9, 2023
âGreenâ EV Battery Factory Uses So Much Energy, It Needs Its Own Coal Plant to Power It
In order to keep up with the demands for Democrat President Joe Bidenâs green agenda, a coal-fired power plant is being expanded to cope with the energy needs of an electric vehicle (EV) battery factory.
The $4 billion Panasonic EV battery factory is being constructed in De Soto, Kansas. The new factory will help satisfy the Biden administrationâs efforts to get everyone into an EV. It also will help extend the life of a coal-fired power plant.
The Evergy Power Plant was slated to be decommissioned as part of the push to eliminate fossil fuels. Plans were in place to transition fossil fuel-burning units at the plant to natural gas.
However, plans have now changed as the power plant will now be used to provide energy for the new battery factory. The plant will now be dedicated to burning coal to provide energy for the battery factory. It will also be expanded to cope with the extra demand.
Panasonic broke ground on the facility last year. The Japanese company was slated to receive $6.8 billion from the Democratsâ âInflation Reduction Act.â The legislation has been pouring billions into electric vehicles and battery factories as part of its effort to transition America away from fossil fuels.
The Kansas City Star reports that the factory will require between 200 and 250 megawatts of electricity to operate. Thatâs roughly the amount of power needed for a small city.
In testimony to the Kansas City Corporation Commission, which is the stateâs equivalent of the Wyoming Public Service Commission, a representative of Evergy, the utility serving the factory, said that the 4 million-square-foot Panasonic facility creates ânear term challenges from a resource adequacy perspective,â according to the newspaper.
As a result, the utility will continue to burn coal at a power plant near Lawrence, Kansas, and it will delay plans to transition units at the plant to natural gas.
Environmentalists, meanwhile, are not happy about that. The situation reflects an ignored fact about EVs â they require enormous amounts of energy to produce. Aside from production, the vehicles themselves also require vast amounts of electricity to charge.
A 15-pound lithium-ion battery holds about the same amount of energy as a pound of oil. To make that battery requires 7,000 pounds of rock and dirt to get the minerals that go into that battery. The average EV battery weighs around 1,000 pounds.
All of that mining and factory processing produces a lot more carbon dioxide emissions than a gas-powered car. EVs have to be driven around 50,000 to 60,000 miles before thereâs a net reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
So, as more factories are built in the U.S. to supply EV manufacturers, there will be higher demands on the grid for power.
Largest EV Charging Station In World Powered By Diesel-Powered Generators.
The Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger station is an impressive beast. With 98 charging bays, the facility in Coalinga, California, is the largest charging station in the world. But to provide that kind of power takes something solar canât provide â diesel generators.

The Harris Ranch Tesla Supercharger station is an impressive beast. With 98 charging bays, the facility in Coalinga, California, is the largest charging station in the world.
In 2017, Tesla CEO said that all Superchargers in the automakerâs network were being converted to solar.
âOver time, almost all will disconnect from the electricity grid,â Musk posted on X, formally known as Twitter.
Superchargers charge vehicles up to the 80% sweet spot in as little as 20 minutes, but to provide that kind of power for nearly 100 bays takes something solar canât provide â diesel generators.
Investigative journalist Edward Niedermeyer discovered that the station was powered by diesel generators hidden behind a Shell station. Reporters at SF Gate tried to find out how much of the station’s electricity was from the generators, but couldnât get a response from Tesla.
The station isnât connected to any dedicated solar farms, which means that absent the diesel generators, the station is powered by Californiaâs grid.
The World Economic Forumâs âGreat Resetâ (which Biden is implementing) is Neo Marxism packaged in a way that if you oppose it you either want to destroy the environment or you are a racist.
Supporters of the World Economic Forum and sympathizers of the Fabian Society are using the facade of âClimate Changeâ to subvert democracies worldwide and impose a âGreat Resetâ to eradicate national frameworks and create globalist, borderless, godless, neo-Marxist, multicultural, open societies. The destruction of the centrality of the U.S. dollar in the Global Financial System and the transfer of Economic Power to the International Monetary Fund is key in the Globalistâs strategy. They are using âClimate Changeâ as a cover to replace democracy and capitalism with a neo-Marxist global tyranny.
The Biden regime has embraced the World Economic Forumâs Great Reset. Critical Race Theory is an integral part of the Great Reset by which education and social contracts are being modified.
On December 3, 2020 Justin Haskins wrote in the Hill âAccording to the Great Resetâs supporters, the plan would fundamentally transform much of society. As World Economic Forum (WEF) head Klaus Schwab wrote back in June, âthe world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a âGreat Resetâ of capitalism.â
âInternationally, the Great Reset has already been backed by influential leaders, activists, academics and institutions. In addition to the World Economic Forum and United Nations, the Great Reset movement counts among its the International Monetary Fund, heads of state, Greenpeace and CEOs and presidents of large corporations and financial institutions such as Microsoft and MasterCardâŠ
Bill Gates Says âBrute Forceâ Climate Policies Wonât Work
Speaking at a live event at The Times Center in New York, the billionaire philanthropist argued for a pragmatic, technology-driven approach to global warming.
âAre we the science people or are we the idiots?â asked Bill Gates, during a discussion about his pragmatic strategy to fighting climate
Bill Gates, the multibillionaire founder of Microsoft, argued for a pragmatic, technology-driven approach to fighting climate change on Thursday.
âIf you try to do climate brute force, you will get people who say, âI like climate but I donât want to bear that cost and reduce my standard of living,ââ Mr. Gates said at the Climate Forward event hosted by The New York Times. âWithout innovation, itâs unlikely, particularly in middle-income countries, that the brute force approach will be successful.â
Mr. Gates also said winning more bipartisan support was needed in order for policy to actually stick. âRepublicans for climate change action are gold, you know,â he said. âThatâs got to be a number that somehow we manage to increase over time.â
âYou canât have a climate policy that when one party is in charge goes full speed ahead and stops cold,â he added. âThese are 30-year investments in steel factories, new ways of making meat.â
Mr. Gates, who in recent weeks has espoused an everything-will-be-fine approach to the climate crisis, was asked whether he could reconcile that stance with the reality of extreme weather around the globe.
âIâm the person who is doing the most on climate in terms of the innovation and how we can square multiple goals,â said Mr. Gates, a co-founder of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a major donor to health- and climate-related causes. âThereâs very limited money for causes to reduce inequity in the world. And no temperate country is going to become uninhabitable.â
Instead, he said, he is taking a more pragmatic approach and drawing a line at untested remedies like planting a trillion trees.
âAre we the science people or are we the idiots?â he said. âWhich one do we want to be?â
BLUF
A âmassive campaign . . . to de-develop the United States.â
âDe-develop the United States.â Ponder that. Mr. Holdren lamented that the idea of de-development was subject to âconsiderable misunderstanding and resistance.â I for one am happy about the resistance. Indeed, I wish it were stiffer. But as for misunderstanding what âde-developmentâ means, I have to take issue. We know exactly what it means. It is the same thing that Luddites and anti-capitalists have always meant: the impoverishment and immiseration of the mass of mankind just so long as the perquisites for the self-appointed nomenklatura persist un-disturbed.
âThe climate crisis,â said Al Gore at the U.N. a couple of days ago, âis a fossil fuel crisis.â
“What climate crisis?â you might be asking, and you would be right to do so. Yes, it is impossible to turn anywhere in our enlightened, environmentally conscious world without being beset by lectures about oneâs âcarbon footprintâ and horror tales about âglobal warming,â ârising seasâ and imminent ecological catastrophe.
But deep down you know that it is all hooey. Mark Twain was right when he observed that it is not so much the things we donât know that get us into trouble. Rather, the mischief is caused by things that we âdo know that ainât so.â
For example, we all âknowâ that carbon dioxide is âbad for the environment.â (In fact, it is a prerequisite for life). We âknowâ that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is reaching historically unprecedented and dangerous levels. (In fact, we have, these past centuries, been living through a CO2 famine). We âknowâ that âglobal warmingââ or, since there has been no warming in more than two decades, that âclimate changeââ has caused a sudden rise in the seas. (In fact, the seas have been rising for the last 20,000 years, since the end of the last Ice Age). We âknowâ that, when it comes to the subject of climate change, the âscience is settled,â that â97 percent of scientistsâ agree that global warming is anthropogenic, which is Greek for âcaused by greedy corporate interests and the combustion of fossil fuels.â
Itâs really quite extraordinary how much we do know that ainât so.
Markey, Ocasio-Cortez ask Biden to create Civilian Climate Corps by executive order
Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), two of Congressâ most vocal proponents for aggressive climate action, on Monday called for President Biden to establish a Civilian Climate Corps.
The CCC had been a key element in early versions of the Build Back Better Act, the sweeping environmental and infrastructure bill. It was not ultimately included in the slimmed down Inflation Reduction Act, which was nonetheless the largest climate bill in U.S. history.
Biden was a vocal backer of the Climate Corps early in his presidency, comparing it to the Civilian Conservation Corps introduced during the presidency of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The original legislation called for $10 billion to launch the new program.
In the letter, timed to the 30th anniversary of the bill that created Americorps, Ocasio-Cortez and Markey cited polling indicating the idea has more than 60 percent support. The two have also reintroduced a bill to establish a corps legislatively, although the measure will almost certainly not be given a vote in the Republican-majority House.
âA central coordinating body, overseen by the White House, will be essential to create a successful and cohesive Civilian Climate Corps,â they wrote. âThrough interagency collaboration, as well as coordination with state climate corps, other state entities, and local non-profit organizations, your Administration can realize the vision of a Civilian Climate Corps that establishes a unified front in the face of climate change â one that looks like America, serves America, and puts good-paying union jobs within reach for more young adults.â
The letter is also signed by members of Democratic congressional leadership like Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.).
Also on Monday, a coalition of more than 50 progressive and environmentalist groups sent a separate letter calling on Biden to establish the CCC, citing its popularity among younger voters in particular.
âWhile previous Executive Orders and legislation under your administration demonstrate tremendous progress toward meeting our Paris climate goals and your campaign promises, this summer has made clear that we must be as ambitious as possible in tackling the great crisis of our time,â they wrote.
âWe encourage your administration to create a Civilian Climate Corps through existing authorities, with existing climate funding, that can coordinate across relevant federal agencies.â
Vanderbilt professor: Climate change stories âcater to the white consciousness.â
A professor of English at Vanderbilt University recently gave a talk about how the genre of climate fiction, or âcli-fi,â has a problem with âits intersection [of] race and genre.â
Teresa Goddu whose advocacy led to the creation of Vanderbiltâs Environmental and Sustainability Studies minor, told an audience at the Novel Seminar Series that climate fiction in the United States âdepicts the climate crisis as a whiteness crisis,â The Hustler reports.
Such stories âoften represent white, mostly privileged characters in communities becoming destabilized if not undone by climate catastrophe,â Goddu said. âClimate punctures the bubble of safety and security that cocoons the white psyche.â
Goddu added that she is âtiredâ of the focus on whiteness in climate stories, or âtexts that actually just reify whiteness.â As a result, sheâs working on âencompassing slave and neo-slave narrativesâ into such tales to âexpand the canon.â
âI really think a lot of climate fiction is being written, but not recognized as such, especially African American literature,â Goddu said. âI want to expand [âŠ] what is considered climate fiction and [redefine] what we are actually reading and paying attention to.â
Looking ahead, Goddu said she hopes her work will expand the genre and leverage optimism, satire and new tropes to innovate the body of work and reimagine a better, more sustainable future.
âI am more interested in reading stories that reimagine possible futures or teach me about the structures, historically and currently, that I live within,â Goddu said. âI donât like literature as policy statements. I donât like literature to be so instrumental.â
According to her faculty bio, Godduâs research deals with âslavery and antislavery, race and American culture [and] genre studies.â In a 2021 interview, Goddu said she began ânoticing how the antislavery movement was being invoked by climate activists as a model.â
âThis led me to consider what social change my own moment demanded of me and how I might bring my giftsâas administrator, teacher, and writerâto bear on the issue,â she said. âIt made sense to connect my long-standing concern with racial justice to the issue of climate justice and my interest in how literature can affect social change to the climate crisis.â
Seven years ago another Vanderbilt academic, Ed Rubin, offered a pair of courses on cli-fi: âVisions of the Future in Cli-Fiâ and âClimate Change Literature: A New Fictional Genre about a Real Problem.â Many of the titles on his reading list (âEarth Abides,â âThe Postman,â âDo Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?â) are Euro/white-centric.
Earthâs atmosphere can clean itself, breakthrough study finds.
Scientists have made a groundbreaking discovery that could change the way we think about air pollution. Researchers at the University of California, Irvine, have found that a strong electric field between airborne water droplets and surrounding air can create a molecule called hydroxide (OH) by a previously unknown mechanism.
This molecule is crucial in helping to clear the air of pollutants, including greenhouse gases and other chemicals.
The discovery is outlined in a new paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which suggests that the traditional thinking around the formation of OH in the atmosphere is incomplete. Until now, it was thought that sunlight was the primary driver of OH formation, but this new research shows that OH can be created spontaneously by the special conditions on the surface of water droplets.
GloBull Warming………..
Since the early 2000s there has been no net change in the Greenland ice sheet mean annual surface temperature, as well as no net change in melt extent percentage.
Greenlandâs ice coverage was, for most of this year (September 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023), observed to be significantly above the long-term (1981-2010) climate average. The Greenland ice sheet didnât even cooperate with the narrative during the âglobal boilingâ melt months of July and August.

Image Source:Â PolarPortal
Greenland has been defying the narrative for decades now. After a brief, sharp warming from 1994 to the early 2000s, the mean annual land surface temperatures (LST) have been trendless since about 2003. Since 2012, Greenland has been cooling (Fang et al., 2023). Compare the colorized Greenland temperature trends lineup for 2007-2012 to the 2013-2020 period (bottom).
Image Source:Â Fang et al., 2023
A trendless temperature record also manifests as non-significant change in melt extent as a percentage of surface area as well as the the mass balance for the whole ice sheet, especially from about 2005 onwards.
Image Source:Â Fang et al., 2023
Other scientists have also reported Greenland warming âis not evidentâ (Matsumura et al., 2022) in recent decades. Instead, temperature stations document net cooling trends from 2001-2019 (Hanna et al., 2021).
Image Source:Â Matsumura et al., 2022

Image Source:Â Hanna et al., 2021
Do Gun-Control Groups Care What Really Causes Mass Shootings? Everytown Lawsuit Says No
The Biden administration has already put nearly 2,000 gun sellers out of business in just two years. Just a few years ago, a lawsuit helped drive the 200-year-old Remington Arms into bankruptcy. But activists wonât stop suing gun shops and anyone else that comes close to the industry.
Last week, attorneys from Everytown Law, the legal arm of Michael Bloombergâs gun-control group Everytown for Gun Safety, filed a lawsuit against a shop that sold the gun used in the fatal shooting of 10 people at a grocery store in Buffalo, New York, in May 2022. The murderer is a racist who specifically targeted racial minorities. Everytown claims the attack âcould have been prevented,â but in fact, the gun seller performed all of the proper background checks.
Others are also being sued, including the 18-year-old murdererâs parents and social media companies that allegedly âtransformed and addictedâ the murderer by allowing extremist content on their sites.
But the lessons from this shooting, like many other mass public shootings, are hiding in plain sight. One needs only to read the killerâs manifesto.
âAreas where CCW [carrying a concealed weapon] are outlawed or prohibited may be good areas of attack,â wrote the shooter. âAreas with strict gun laws are also great places of attack.â
But Everytown ignores those quotes. Nor does the organization mention that the Buffalo mass murderer self-identified as an âeco-fascist national socialistâ and a member of the âmild-moderate authoritarian left.â The shooter expressed concern that minority immigrants have too many children and will damage the environment. âThe invaders are the ones overpopulating the world,â he wrote. âKill the invaders, kill the overpopulation and by doing so save the environment.â
NEW – Biden's climate czar John Kerry: "Now humanity is inexorably threatened by humanity itself."pic.twitter.com/n5MBBzU6EL
— Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) August 25, 2023
If he means normal humans are threatened by his type of human then I canât argue.
— Kinda Detroit (@pensfan27) August 25, 2023
Have you ever wondered how much it would cost to replace a battery in the Chevy Volt? Yeah, me neither. But now I know, as do you. It would seem the car is totaled when it comes time to replace the battery. No wonder they have zero trade value. pic.twitter.com/voKlzJZ4Nk
— Military Arms (@MAC_Arms) August 22, 2023




