St. George Tucker, a member of the Continental Congress, an officer in the Virginia militia during the revolution, and a professor at the College of William and Mary, before becoming a state and then federal judge, wrote a book about the Constitution, where he observed that people in government were working as hard as possible to evade its restrictions almost before the ink was dry.
Is it within reason to legitimately conclude that the Constitution was ‘inadequate’ from the start?
Could be……….
BLUF:
If morality is the defining quality for our form of self-government, we may no longer be qualified to self-govern. The Framers understood this. Our new immorality is the prescription for the constitutional system to fail. It is not that society cannot be formed by immoral people. It certainly can. However, that society’s governance will reflect the people’s (im)morality, and that rule will be centered on command and control without a moral basis. It will be tyranny.
Are we still a moral people capable of self-governance?
“Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” —John Adams
John Adams was not alone in understanding that our Constitution functions only if people have a shared morality derived from Judeo-Christian principles. James Madison wrote that our Constitution requires “sufficient virtue among men for self-government”; otherwise, “nothing less than the chains of despotism can restrain them from destroying and devouring one another.” It’s not clear that 21st-century America has that necessary virtue.
The Ten Commandments are at the center of Judeo-Christian moral teaching. (I have written before about the connection of virtue and morality as it relates to First and Second Amendment rights.) Even non-religious people once understood that these principles are useful guides for moral living in a functioning society. Much has changed in just a few years, though.
The first few commandments are about man’s relationship with God and are not relevant to this discussion. What matters here are the commandments that concern our relationships with others, which define morality as our Framers understood it. They have societal value independent of the precepts about the relationship to God. No religious beliefs are necessary to accept their value as moral principles. It was this morality that the Framers saw as essential to constitutional self-government.
Today, many on the left no longer consider these principles a standard for moral behavior. They have become a standard to avoid. A significant part of our society believes we should actively defy the moral truth of these principles. This belief has serious political implications.