When you let PR people write your lawsuits.
But I guess since they have no actual substantive argument to make, why not. https://t.co/Wpmet6rv83
— Kostas Moros (@MorosKostas) September 29, 2022
Thread reader
“brazen and provocative marketing”
The lawsuit says that AR-15s “are unsuited for home defense, recreation, or casual use and possession.”
The lawsuit says the gun store should have known one of its customers would be a mass shooter because they were “always alone and quiet”:
According to the lawsuit, Daniel Defense’s guns are weapons of war, but their advertisements are misleading because they use military imagery
The lawsuit says that “AR-15 style rifles, rapid-fire trigger systems, and high-capacity magazines are used by most often by young adults in mass shootings.”
The lawsuit says that “AR-15 style rifles destroy human bodies, limbs, organs, and tissue, pulverize the human body, explode, and cause immediate death.”
• • •