Cedars-Sinai Report: 30% more young people dying from heart attacks.

Cedars Sinai hospital dropped an atomic bomb of truth on us: 30% more young people are dying from heart attacks than before the pandemic.

The rise in heart attacks is so striking because the demographic it has hit is shocking: people from 25-44 years old. People in this age group are not generally known for dropping like flies from heart disease.

What’s to account for this alarming increase in deaths–not just heart attacks, but deaths from heart attacks, which are rare in this demographic?

Obviously, according to CBS News, it is failing to wear masks.

Yep. That is the most obvious cause. Couldn’t possibly be anything else. Like the alarming effects of the vaccine on the heart that has been documented many times. Especially in younger men.

This is absurd. If there were somehow evidence that people who did not get vaccinated were having more heart attacks than those who did, such speculation could make sense. Although we know that the vaccine does next to nothing to prevent infection, there is evidence that it does provide some protection from systemic infections that go beyond the respiratory system.

I wrote about that not long ago. It was none other than Anthony Fauci who fessed up to the fact that the vaccine doesn’t prevent infection or transmission of respiratory viruses, and that without EUAs they could never pass muster in the way other vaccines can.

This could explain why fewer people who get the vaccine die from the disease. But it is pretty conclusively demonstrated that the vaccination cannot prevent infection by itself. If there were solid evidence I could be convinced that on balance being vaccinated is better than not for the age cohort in question, but there is a remarkable lack of curiosity about the relative risks of the vaccine in younger people.

Perhaps, if there were evidence that the risks to the heart in younger people are greater from COVID than from the vaccine it might be plausible that both the vaccine and the virus are each responsible for some proportion of this–but there is little evidence to supports this either because the CDC is careful to not stratify by age the myocarditis numbers. They lump 88-year-olds in with young men, who respond differently to the vaccine and get myocarditis at different rates.

You need randomized controlled trials to figure stuff like this out, and they refuse–absolutely refuse–to do them. They claim the vaccine is so obviously good that it would be unethical to not vaccinate everyone.

But vaccines pretty clearly are risky for young people. This is why many European countries don’t offer the vaccine to people under 50 anymore–the risk profile isn’t that great. It is probably negative for younger males–that is what Vinay Prasad et al argued in a peer-reviewed paper recently.  They demonstrated that the incidence of serious adverse events from vaccines in younger men far outweighs the number of hospital visits avoided by vaccinating this cohort of people.

The American Heart Association has also published a paper recently on myocarditis and vaccines. It is undeniable that there is a substantial risk of heart damage caused by the vaccine, particularly affecting exactly the people who are now dying from heart attacks for unknown reasons.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to at least ask the question: what is the relationship between the alarming increase in heart attacks and the vaccine programs? Segregating out the number of people killed by vaccine-induced myocarditis and COVID-induced heart troubles should be priority #1 for research scientists.

I don’t expect the CDC, though, will be pushing that through. The answers could be very inconvenient.