The entire interview with SloJoe.
Category: You Can’t Make This Up
Chimps have better parenting than some parents today. Crazy.
— Global Statistics (@Globalstats11) May 17, 2025
SCOTUS to CASA to A.A.R.P.: In Case Of (Perceived) Emergency, Ignore The Rules, And Make Stuff Up
None of the usual rules will apply when the ACLU says there is an emergency.
The past 24 hours have been something of a Rorschach Test for the Supreme Court. In the birthright citizenship case, the Court made clear that in emergencies, the judiciary must retain the power to enter universal injunctions, even if Article III does not otherwise permit such injunctions. And in A.A.R.P. v. Trump, the Court made clear that in emergencies, the court should certify a class without going through Rule 23, and grant an ex parte tro without considering any of the usual TRO factors.
What lesson should lower court judges take away? In cases of perceived emergencies, forget all the rules and make stuff up. When the executive branch takes such actions we call it an autocracy. When the courts do it, they call it the “rule of law.”
I will have much more to say about this order in due course.
🚨 HOLY CRAP… Liberal Justice Kentaji Brown Jackson declares she wants nationwide injunctions because if not, the executive would no longer have to 'move quickly' to reclaim its Article 2 powers… pic.twitter.com/Q8P5ATRjRN
She is basically saying here that she wants the lower…
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 15, 2025
Judicial immunity applies to conduct inside the courtroom as she oversees a case. She allegedly helped an illegal alien escape capture by ICE. That conduct does not fall within the scope of judging anymore than drunk driving does not fall within the scope of judging. No immunity.
— Mark W. Smith/#2A Scholar (@fourboxesdiner) May 15, 2025
Menendez Brothers Have Murder Sentence Reduced & Are Now Eligible For Parole
Erik and Lyle Menendez, who have served roughly 35 years of a life-without-parole prison sentence for the 1989 shotgun slayings of their parents in Beverly Hills, were re-sentenced today to 50 years to life, immediately making them eligible for parole.
The decision by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Jesic does not automatically mean the pair will be released from prison. They will have to appear before a parole board, which will recommend whether they should be available for parole. The recommendation would then go to Gov. Gavin Newsom, who could reject their release.
More to come…
Really?
DOJ to Illinois Gun Owners: Write Your Democrat Legislators to Repeal Infringements
“We recently received your March 27, 2025, message to the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) regarding firearm laws and Second Amendment rights,” a reply letter from Hadiza L. Buge, Acting Assistant Deputy Director, Public and Governmental Affairs, to an activist who had filed a civil rights complaint against the state of Illinois’ requirement to obtain a Firearm Owner’s Identification card (FOID) as a prior restraint and precondition to buying a gun. “DOJ forwarded your inquiry to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) for response.”
It was actually his second attempt to hold Attorney General Pam Bondi to her word (Justice punted on his first complaint, asking it to investigate an anti-gun judge’s political and financial conflicts of interest), given in a press release announcing a Second Amendment Pattern-or-Practice Investigation into Los Angeles County concealed handgun license application delays, that:
“This Department of Justice will not stand idly by while States and localities infringe on the Second Amendment rights of ordinary, law-abiding Americans. The Second Amendment is not a second-class right, and under my watch, the Department will actively enforce the Second Amendment just like it actively enforces other fundamental constitutional rights.”
Points brought to the DOJ’s attention in the FOID complaint:
- The reason for the law was to dissuade minorities (specifically African Americans during a time of racial riots/unrest and distrust amongst racial groups and law enforcement) from seeking police permission to legally own firearms.
- Funding for FOID cards and carry licenses is used now as a “piggy bank” by the IL General Assembly to fund other projects, leading to delays in processing (with a documented case of a 20-month wait).
- A woman with no criminal record was charged with a crime for possessing a single-shot rifle in her home without a FOID.
“ATF is a law enforcement agency within the DOJ dedicated to reducing violent crime and protecting the public. ATF’s mission focuses on administering Federal criminal laws and regulating the firearms and explosives industries,” Buge’s response continued. “In support of this mission, ATF implements policy and regulations to enforce laws created by Congress. As such, we encourage you to reach out to your State congressional delegation with your recommendations regarding firearm laws. We hope this information proves helpful to you.”
Right. In Illinois. How helpful.
Translation: ATF only deals with federal issues, and your state complaint is outside of its jurisdiction, so DOJ forwarding it to them can’t go anywhere. If you want relief, contact your state representatives, the Democrat ones who are passing citizen disarmament edicts, and ask them not to. We’re washing our hands of it.
SCOTUS just relisted Snope and Ocean State Tactical for the 5/15 conference. Here we go again!
— Hannah Hill (@hannahhill_sc) May 12, 2025
I AM ABOUT TO ATTEMPT TO SPEAK SOMETHING INTO EXISTENCE-
SCOTUS is conferencing Snope (again) Thursday, which is also an opinion day. So they are going to issue a per curiam, then use the conference and subsequent orders list to send it back to the 4th Circuit summarily…
— Kostas Moros (@MorosKostas) May 12, 2025
You Can NOT make this up!
Stunned Tater Tillis of North Carolina blocked Trumps original nominee as the D.C. Federal Prosecutor. This is ‘in your face’ hardball politics.
JUST IN: Trump makes Fox News’s Jeanine Pirro DC’s top prosecutorhttps://t.co/8hLBBTJOGv
— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) May 8, 2025
As lower and district court judges continue to one-up each other with absurd usurpations of clearly stated executive authority, another contender has entered the ring.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled on Friday night that the President of the United States does not have the power to pull government security clearances from Perkins Coie, a private law firm. Yeah, that would be the same Perkins Coie that worked with Democrats to gin up the Russian collusion hoax.
In her order, Howell decided that quoting Shakespeare was appropriate. I guess our judiciary is full of theater kids.
“No American President has ever before issued executive orders like the one at issue in this lawsuit targeting a prominent law firm with adverse actions to be executed by all Executive branch agencies but, in purpose and effect, this action draws from a playbook as old as Shakespeare, who penned the phrase: ‘The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,’” Howell wrote in the 102-page order on Friday.
Howell alleges that the Trump administration violated the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, with her basic argument being that the executive order in question amounted to illegal coercion. In arguably politicized fashion, she went on to express animosity toward the law firms that cut deals with the administration to keep their clearances.
All of this will undoubtedly and justifiably seem ridiculous to onlookers, regardless of what legal arguments may or may not actually exist. Control over security clearances is a vested power in the executive branch, and if the president decides he doesn’t want a law firm that literally targeted him on behalf of Hillary Clinton to have access to classified materials within his administration, one would think he should be able to do so.
Spain experienced a nationwide power outage one week after reaching 100% “green” energy.
For those keeping score at home:
April 22nd: Spain brags about hitting 100% renewable power.
April 28th: Spain has the nation’s largest blackout in history. pic.twitter.com/S6wsaHEePK
— Will Hild (@WillHild) April 28, 2025
Across all of Portugal and Spain, people were left without power or cell service of any kind. The nations literally went dark.
Tens of millions of people had to resort to old handheld radios to figure out what was even happening. It could have been an alien invasion for all they knew!
From El Pais:
The outage suddenly set Spain back to the 19th century. Traffic lights out of service, traffic jams forming across the country, pedestrians wandering around cities without public transportation, desperate families trying to communicate with their loved ones, passengers left stranded without trains or flights, canceled medical appointments, rescues underway in subway stations and elevators, lines forming outside small shops due to supermarket closures…
I wonder what could have caused this?
For no reason at all, here’s a video of Spaniards celebrating the destruction of a nuclear power plant three years ago.
Spain three years ago:
— Ada Lluch (@ada_lluch) April 28, 2025
nics_alert_memo_04242025_508c_0ATF is instituting new measures to protect gun-owner privacy and to prevent the misuse of a law enforcement tool. Senior-leadership approval is required for all requests to receive information from the NICS alert to investigate firearms trafficking. https://t.co/TWiD00lbZp #ATF pic.twitter.com/zwjeMjYHA0
— ATF HQ (@ATFHQ) April 25, 2025
https://t.co/Rl51iRg0Sr pic.twitter.com/vEDfC64qoz
— John Ringo SF Author (@Jringo1508) April 27, 2025
Well, I hope he’s wrong, but SI VIS PACEM PARA BELLUM
In 2025, an attorney for a government school district is able to make it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court defending exposing children as young as three years old to books about sexuality. Imagine going back in time to any point—even just a few years ago—and explaining that… pic.twitter.com/mMA3ZslRvs
— Laura Powell (@LauraPowellEsq) April 23, 2025
In 2025, an attorney for a government school district is able to make it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court defending exposing children as young as three years old to books about sexuality. Imagine going back in time to any point—even just a few years ago—and explaining that this is considered a serious argument.
What I find most remarkable about the exchange is the attorney’s acknowledgment that their intent is to “influence” children. He begins to explain that the goal is to install “civility,” which is the “natural consequence of being exposed to—” before he is cut off. Was he going to say that “civility” results from exposure to sexual content at a very young age? What could “civility” possibly mean here?
MR. SCHOENFELD: Pride Puppy was the book that was used for the pre-kindergarten curriculum. That’s no longer in the curriculum.
JUSTICE GORSUCH: That’s the one where they’re supposed to look for the leather and things—bondage, things like that, right?
MR. SCHOENFELD: It’s not bondage. It’s a woman in a leather—
JUSTICE GORSUCH: Sex worker, right?
MR. SCHOENFELD: No. That’s not correct. No.
JUSTICE GORSUCH: I thought—gosh, I read it.
JUSTICE BARRETT: It’s a drag queen in drag.
JUSTICE GORSUCH: Drag queen in—drag queen?
MR. SCHOENFELD: So, correct. The leather that they’re pointing to is a woman in a leather jacket, and one of the words is drag queen in this—
JUSTICE GORSUCH: And they’re supposed to look for those?
MR. SCHOENFELD: It is an option at the end of the book, correct.
JUSTICE GORSUCH: Yeah. Okay. And you’ve included these in the English language curriculum rather than the human sexuality curriculum to influence students, is that fair? That’s what the district court found. Do you agree with that?
MR. SCHOENFELD: I think, to the extent the district court found that it was to influence, it was to influence them towards civility, the natural consequence of being exposed to—
JUSTICE GORSUCH: Whatever, but to influence them.
MR. SCHOENFELD: In the manner that I just mentioned, yes.
SiG 320s have been having “uncommanded” discharges, and we get this?
Glad to know the “carry without it chambered” fuddlore just got another decade of life breathed into it. pic.twitter.com/yiijSZGA6O
— Shadz (@Shadzey1) April 23, 2025
Weapons concerned are a shotgun and handgun…
Officers shot the suspected gunman, who is now hospitalized.
What we know
- Two people are dead and a sheriff deputy’s son is in custody after an active shooter was reported at Florida State University’s campus in Tallahassee.
- The suspect is the 20-year-old son of a current sheriff’s deputy who had access to one of her weapons, according to Leon County Sheriff Walt McNeil.
- At least six people are receiving treatment at Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare, a hospital spokesperson confirmed to NBC News.
- In a recent update, FSU informed students that the threat to the campus has been “neutralized” but the area around the campus is still considered an active crime scene.
- One FSU student who saw the shooter described him as a “normal college dude” who was wearing an orange T-shirt and khaki shorts. “I was walking and this guy pulls up in an orange Hummer,” the student said. “And he gets out with a rifle and shoots in my direction.”
start w/yourself Carol Baker
— CJ LoveYaUSA (@LoveYaUSA) April 15, 2025
And it’s like an Ice Pick is being s-l-o-w-l-y jabbed deep inside

