Well, if the demoncraps didn’t have double standards……..


Anti-Gun Senator Has Spent Millions on Private Security

There’s something very elitist about anti-gun politicians and celebrities, especially those who have the resources to hire protective details for themselves, even as they work to deny you and me the ability to protect ourselves.

In other words, they act as if the only people deserving of being kept safe are those who can outsource it.

Take Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia (please?) for example.

And, it seems, that he’s spent millions on private security during that timeframe.

FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Raphael Warnock’s, D-Ga., re-election campaign has spent an eye-popping amount of cash on private security over nine months in 2025 despite a history of supporting stricter gun control measures.

Between January and September of this year, Warnock spent approximately $360,000 on security services from Executive Protection Agencies, LLC, an Atlanta-based security firm that includes both armed and unarmed options. Warnock’s office did not clarify what type of service he was paying the firm to provide.

However, the security firm’s website says it uses its armed services to provide protection for “political figures.” A Fox News Digital review found that Warnock’s campaign has spent over $2.7 million on private security dating back to Dec. 2020.

Warnock has regularly pushed gun control in Congress, including co-sponsoring legislation to ban assault weapons and require universal background checks, voting for federal red flag laws, supporting stricter penalties for those who purchase firearms from sellers not legally allowed to do so and stricter licensing requirements for sellers, among other initiatives.

Now, whether the security is armed or not is, in my mind, mostly irrelevant. Sure, it’s more hypocritical if it’s armed, but any kind of private security is hypocritical while he works to deny us the ability to protect our family.

See, any security detail is going to be visible. Armed or unarmed, they’re there and they’re a deterrent to any potential assault. No one knows if they’ve got guns, for one thing.

Yet you and I don’t get that. We don’t have big guys in suits standing around us, scanning the surroundings, giving off an air of “mess you up” to everyone around us. We don’t get that deterrent effect at all.

For us, it’s a different matter, and for many of us, that means carrying a firearm to keep us and ours safe.

Warnock, however, works against us being able to do that. He’s vocally supported numerous gun control measures, and his anti-Second Amendment advocacy goes back to 2013, according to the Free Beacon. This isn’t new for him.

Especially since he’s in a party that tries to make a big deal out of helping the less fortunate. The $450,000 Warnock spends per year, on average, sure would help an awful lot of less fortunate souls out there, don’t you think?

But then again, like so many anti-gunners, it’s not really about keeping people safe. It’s about making sure we rely on the government for everything, including our safety, which they cannot guarantee.

Most Virginia Dems Sticking By Candidate Who Wanted ‘Two Bullets to the Head” of Republican Lawmaker

The Democratic candidate for Attorney General in Virginia is still getting the support of most party officials and candidates, despite the release of text messages from just three years ago where he said Republican Delegate Todd Gilbert should get “two bullets to the head” as well as wishing harm to Gilbert’s two children.

Jay Jones, a former delegate himself, sent the text messages to Del. Carrie Coyner, and National Review obtained and published the series of deeply disturbing texts a few days ago . The conversation between Jones and the lawmaker took place after former state legislator Joe Johnson, Jr. passed away in August, 2022. Jones was apparently upset that Gilbert and other Republicans were honoring Johnson, who was widely seen as a moderate Democrat.

“If those guys die before me,” Jones wrote, referencing the Republican colleagues who were publicly honoring the deceased Johnson’s memory, “I will go to their funerals to piss on their graves” to “send them out awash in something.”

Jones then suggested that, presented with a hypothetical situation in which he had only two bullets and was faced with the choice of murdering then-Speaker of the House Todd Gilbert or two dictators, he’d shoot Gilbert “every time,” prompting pushback from his former colleague:

Jones: Three people, two bullets Gilbert, hitler, and pol pot

Gilbert gets two bullets to the head

Spoiler: put Gilbert in the crew with the two worst people you know and he receives both bullets every time

Coyner: Jay Please stop

Jones: Lol Ok, ok

Coyner: It really bothers me when you talk about hurting people or wishing death on them It isn’t ok No matter who they are

That’s bad enough, but it gets even worse. According to NR, Jones then called Coyner to try to explain his comments, and at one point argued that the only way to enact public policy changes is when lawmakers “feel pain themselves.”

Then at one point, the source said, he suggested he wished Gilbert’s wife could watch her own child die in her arms so that Gilbert might reconsider his political views, prompting Coyner to hang up the phone in disgust.

Afterward, Jones continued his barrage of text messages, saying he was just asking questions. Coyner dismissed his excuse via text and chastised Jones for “hopping [sic] Jennifer Gilbert’s children would die.”

Rather than deny that he had wished death on the children, Jones responded by saying, “Yes, I’ve told you this before. Only when people feel pain personally do they move on policy.”

Faced with more pushback from his frazzled former colleague, Jones somehow took the conversation a step further: “I mean do I think Todd and Jennifer are evil? And that they’re breeding little fascists? Yes,” he wrote, referring to Gilbert’s wife and two young children.

Despite all of the calls we’ve heard from Democratic politicians about the need to dial down political rhetoric since the assassination of Charlie Kirk, most Democratic candidates in Virginia haven’t demanded that Jones step down after the disgusting views were unveiled. They’ve condemned what Jones had to say, but point to his apology as reason enough to continue backing his campaign to serve as the state’s top law enforcement official.

“I take full responsibility for my actions, and I want to issue my deepest apology to Speaker Gilbert and his family. Reading back those words made me sick to my stomach. I am embarrassed, ashamed, and sorry.”

The statement continues, “I have reached out to Speaker Gilbert to apologize directly to him, his wife Jennifer, and their children. I cannot take back what I said; I can only take full accountability and offer my sincere apology. Virginians deserve honest leaders who admit when they are wrong and own up to their mistakes. This was a grave mistake and I will work every day to prove to the people of Virginia that I will fight for them as Attorney General.”

Jones, however, also told Richmond television station WTVR shortly after releasing that statement taking “full responsibility” for the texts that he’s the victim of a “smear” by Republican Attorney General Jason Miyares and “Trump-controlled media organizations.”

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Abigail Spanberger said she expressed her “disgust” to Jones after learning about the echange with Coyner, but didn’t call on him to drop out of the race. In fact, only one Democratic candidate that I’m aware of has said she wants nothing to do with Jones after his comments became public knowledge.

Good for Hayes, though given the makeup of the House district where she’s running, she’s an underdog even without Jones’ comments potentially serving as a drag on Democratic candidates.

Jones, it should be noted, was a staunch champion of gun control during his time in the Virginia Assembly and has been endorsed by Everytown for Gun Safety, which has yet to make any statement about one of their “gunsense” candidates hoping for the death of a Republican lawmaker’s children.

To say that these comments demonstrate that Jones lacks the character and temperament to serve as Attorney General is an understatement. This wasn’t a “mistake” by Jones. He had multiple opportunities at the time he sent those messages to think and reflect on what he was saying. Instead of being embarrassed, ashamed, or sorry, he doubled down. He apparently never apologized to Gilbert at any point in the three years since he made those comments, though he had to have known they would get back to the lawmaker and his family. Only when these abhorrent comments were made did he decide it was time to apologize for, among other things, wanting one or both of the Gilbert’s children to die in their mom’s arms so that maybe her husband would vote for a gun control bill in the future.

I’ve seen some folks suggest that Jones’ comments would be enough to get the supporter of “red flag” laws served with an Extreme Risk Protection Order of his own, but I don’t think that’s the case. Jones never said that he himself wanted to harm Gilbert or his kids, even while wishing for their death. I don’t believe those statements prove that Jones is too dangerous to own a gun, but I definitely believe that they show he’s too dangerous to serve in public office, especially in the role of Attorney General.

Make it make sense: Gun grabbers come out against fighting crime

A gun control nonprofit that wants to disarm Americans has come out against President Donald Trump’s Washington, D.C., crime crackdown.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, known these days as Brady: United Against Gun Violence, issued a lengthy statement on Monday condemning Trump’s ongoing D.C. crime crackdown.

The statement began by describing the one-day Jan. 6 riot as “the worst outbreak of mass violence in recent District memory.”

Recall that only one person died during the riot: Rioter Ashli Babbitt. Meanwhile, 99 people have been murdered in D.C. this year alone.

The statement continued by using possibly falsified crime data to claim violent crime in D.C. “has fallen precipitously since 2023 and were at a 30-year low the day the president returned to the Oval Office.”

Hilariously, the statement attributed this alleged low to the Biden administration’s otherwise widely panned policy decisions.

According to the White House, the reality is that “D.C.’s murder rate is roughly three times higher than that of Islamabad, Pakistan, and 18 times higher than that of communist-run Havana, Cuba.”

The statement from Brady president Kris Brown concluded with her suggesting that Trump’s federal police are the ones “endanger[ing]” D.C. residents, not the hordes of violent criminals running the streets.

“We cannot allow the president to suggest that federalized police is an appropriate response to any and all challenges; or that federalized police do not further endanger the public, especially Black and Brown communities who live and work in or visit D.C.,” it read.

So, in other words, the same people who want to disarm Americans, thus making them prey to criminals, also want to effectively disarm the police, making residents even more prey to criminals. It makes no sense, especially when you factor in how the locals actually feel.

Last year, dozens of business groups with offices in D.C. penned a letter to Mayor Muriel Bowser expressing “deep concern about the alarming increase in violent crime across our city.”

 

“D.C. is quickly becoming a national outlier in rising crime, and the trends are alarming,” the letter read. “Our organizations are primarily based in the downtown business district, where there have been horrifying acts of violence.”

“Innocent people in neighborhoods across the city have been targeted in robberies, carjackings, and seemingly random acts of violence,” the letter continued.

D.C. Police Union Chairman Gregg Pemberton has also raised concerns about the city’s violent crime epidemic.

“We stand with the President in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,” he said in a statement. “Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.”

He reiterated this during an appearance this week on Fox News’ “America Reports“:

 

As for Brady, last year it also came out against self-defense, arguing that guns “are rarely used successfully in self-defense.” The stunning claim prompted a fact-check from Breitbart.

“Academic work by Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck shows that, at a minimum, guns are used to protect life and property at least 760,000 times a year,” the fact-check reads.