November 27, 2024

All this was, was political shenanigans to try and shame Trump’s political support into running away, so he’d drop out of running for reelection. If Trump would drop, he’d be way too old to run in 2028, so he’d be done. Trump apparently figured it out, and here we are.
Jack Smith’s End Of Lawfare Charges Against Trump Proves It Was A Political Witch Hunt.
Special Counsel Jack Smith said on Monday that the evidence against now President-elect Donald Trump in the 2020 election case is rock-solid and that no one is “above the law” — but that he’d nonetheless drop the charges against Trump.
But if that’s the case, why bail out now? Surely if Trump is really the criminal mastermind Smith alleges he is, there’s no conscionable way he could drop the charges. The reality is that Smith knows this was never about the law. It was about leftists using lawfare to prosecute and ideally jail their political opponent.
“After careful consideration, the Department has determined that OLC’s [Office of Legal Counsel] prior opinions concerning the Constitution’s prohibition on federal indictment and prosecution of a sitting President apply to this situation and that as a result this prosecution must be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated,” Smith’s filing stated.
Smith still made sure to add a throw-away-line that the decision to drop the case did not “turn on the gravity of the crimes charged, the strength of the Government’s proof, or the merits of the prosecution, which the Government stands fully behind.” But, Smith added, the Department of Justice concluded that pursuing the case would hinder Trump’s ability to lead.
Trump was indicted by Smith for questioning the administration of the 2020 election. The Supreme Court torpedoed Smith’s efforts in July when it ruled 6-3 that a president has “absolute immunity” for “actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority” and “at least presumptive immunity” for all “official acts.” The court sent several questions pertaining to the charges against Trump back to the lower court to determine whether his actions constituted an official act. Smith then filed a superseding indictment against Trump, refusing to let the case go when he thought it would hurt Trump’s chances of winning the election.
The Trump-Vance transition team celebrated the decision in a statement.
“Today’s decision by the DOJ ends the unconstitutional federal cases against President Trump, and is a major victory for the rule of law,” Trump communications director Steven Cheung said in a statement. “The American People and President Trump want an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and we look forward to uniting our country.”
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg agreed on Tuesday to indefinitely delay Trump’s sentencing in the case regarding Trump’s alleged payments to his then-lawyer Michael Cohen. Cohen was purportedly instructed to pay pornographer Stormy Daniels to stay quiet about an alleged affair (which is not illegal). But Bragg claimed that Trump’s payments to Cohen (which were classified as legal payments) should have been classified as campaign expenses, alleging that the payments were made to influence the 2016 election. Cohen, however, testified that Trump was concerned that the allegations would negatively affect his family after they first surfaced in 2011.
Should Trump go all out and prosecute these people, or have mercy in the name of unity?
GBRS new suppressor height sights……….

Quote from a former head of the Secret Service, in response to Asst. Secy Ron Noble’s suggestion to combine BATF with Customs and Secret Service: “Mix dirty water with clean water, you get dirty water.”
November 26, 2024
Well, we need to eliminate NFA-34, FFA-38, GCA-68 & 18 U.S. Code Chapter 44, as well, or some other bunch of bureaucraps will simply start enforcing those laws & regulations.
As Trump Heads to White House Rep. Burlison Pushes Plan to Abolish ATF
With President-elect Donald Trump heading to the White House and Congress under Republican control, Rep. Eric Burlison (R) is pushing ahead with plans to abolish the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, commonly known as the ATF.
FOX News quoted Burlison describing the ATF as “a disaster.”
He said, “For several decades they’ve been a disaster agency [which has] been violating the Second Amendment.”
Burlison wants a scenario in which states handle their gun law enforcement without federal agencies breathing down their necks.
He re-posted an X post from Ted Nugent on Friday:
— Ted Nugent (@TedNugent) November 22, 2024
The ATF issued numerous rules during the Biden/Harris administration, one of which criminalized owners of legally purchased AR-pistol stabilizer braces. Another one of the ATF’s rules declared that 80 percent complete firearm frames are firearms and therefore can only be acquired via background checks.
The ATF also issued a rule instituting, for all intents and purposes, universal background checks.
Lawsuits filed by Gun Owners of America, the Firearms Policy Coalition, and the Second Amendment Foundation, have rendered many of these and other ATF rules unenforceable or otherwise moot. Legal action on some of the rules continues and Rep. Burlison wants an America in which the lawsuits would not be necessary because the ATF would not exist.
Why does The Lord of the Rings still look so good?
Many reasons, but here’s one: Minas Tirith wasn’t CGI. They built a miniature version of the city and filmed that. It looks realistic — because it was real.
And this wasn’t even the biggest model they made… pic.twitter.com/4SYCkmkwAS
— The Cultural Tutor (@culturaltutor) November 24, 2024
Quip O’ The Day:
Neil Degrasse Tyson is the imitation crab of science. Manufactured to look authentic, but as soon as you get a taste you know it’s fake.
There are no inconvenient facts for the left. Anything inconvenient is disinformation. Transgender women have an athletic advantage over cisgender women? Nope, that is disinformation. Late term abortions for convenience? There are none. There are no tradeoffs or considerations…
— Brad Hage (@brad_hage) November 24, 2024
The first entity to establish a Mars colony will be the universe’s first trillionaire.
Lately, we’ve had a lot of puddlefish whining about how “we” shouldn’t go to Mars. Some of them actually think they get a vote, based on economic illiteracy and the delusion that SpaceX is somehow part of the US federal government. [Closed caption for the hard-of-thinking: it isn’t.]
But others just think they are giving good investment advice… SpaceX investors can do what they want, but Mars is a frozen wasteland full of nothing but near-vacuum and rocks.
So why would anyone want to go there?

Elon Musk likes to answer this question by pointing out that it’s not a good idea to store all humanity’s eggs in one basket. He’s right, but this kind of argument isn’t comprehensible to everyone, nor is it the full picture.
So now it’s the SF writer’s turn.
And therefore I present to you…
An Economic Roadmap for the Future of Humanity.


Coffee drinking habits may greatly impact makeup of gut biome, research suggests
A large international team of medical researchers has found that people who drink coffee regularly have much more of one type of gut bacteria than people who do not. In their study, published in the journal Nature Microbiology, the group analyzed stool and blood samples from a large number of patients and also studied similar data in large medical databases, looking for impacts of coffee drinking on the gut biome.
Nathan McNulty and Jeffrey Gordon with the Washington University School of Medicine have published a News & Views piece in the same journal issue outlining this work.
Prior research has shown that food and beverage consumption have impacts on the gut biome, the community of fungi, yeasts and bacteria that live in the human gastrointestinal tract. But which foods promote a healthy biome and which are detrimental are still not well understood.
Making your defensive pistol of choice work for you is a process.
I am continuing to carry my 4-inch Smith & Wesson Model 19-3 as much as possible. You may recall that I made the commitment to carry this particular handgun as much as possible for the next year. Familiarity and continued use makes the handling of a particular gun second nature, cutting valuable milliseconds off of pistol presentation, sight alignment and the proper trigger press. And I took on this project in the continued effort to make myself the best handgunner that I can possibly become.
One connected project was selecting the best ammunition for my use in personal defense as well as taking various varmints and critters that I encounter in the rural setting where I hang my hat. After experimenting with various .38 Spl./.357 Mag. loads from mainstream manufacturers, I have settled one one from Underwood Ammo. Specifically, it is the .38 Spl. +P load that utilizes a 158-grain SWC lead hollow point that features a gas check and a polymer coating.
This particular Underwood .38 load is reported to generate 1,160 fps from a 4-inch barrel. And that, my friends, is about what the old .38 Spl. Heavy Duty ammo provided in the days before the .357 Mag. was introduced. It is a hot .38 Spl. load, but not quite as hot as the current magnum loadings that will eventually cause problems in a medium-frame revolver. More importantly, I find it quite accurate in my Smith & Wesson.
It is critically important that a defensive ammo first be very reliable and the Underwood load passed that test. Secondly, it should shoot to point of aim but, since my gun has adjustable sights I gave this load points for shooting nice tight groups at 25 yards. From a rest, it delivers 2 inches, or slightly less, and those results are quite uniform from shooting session to shooting session. So it appears that my ammo search is over.
My ongoing project has also revealed that my choice of appendix carry was a wise one. Since our hands are nearly always at or near the front of our body, they are also a bit closer to the defensive handgun. The results are that I find that my pistol presentation is just a bit faster from this position. In addition, with a bit of practice, the handgun is also accessible for a support-hand draw, should my shooting hand be injured or otherwise occupied, an important consideration. And this carry position presents no more challenges than any other carry method on or about the waist; you simply work out what kind of covering garment will suffice.
The real key to finding your personal defense gun is to first get good professional training in marksmanship, gun handling and safety, then, based upon that training, begin to experiment with guns, ammo and carry methods until you find what works for you. Several readers have said that they would be engaging in their own personal challenge and I would like to hear how that is working out for you.
November 25, 2024
JUST STOP! I can only handle so much joy each day.
BREAKING: All employees in the Office for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion are threatening to resign if Pete Hegseth is confirmed as Secretary of Defense. pic.twitter.com/sbs8TSW0vQ
— A Man Of Memes (@RickyDoggin) November 24, 2024
Where Does Pam Bondi Stand on Gun Control?
Donald Trump’s second choice for Attorney General is likely to find a warmer reception in the Senate than Matt Gaetz did, but she could face some hostility from Second Amendment organizations over some of her previous positions on guns and gun control.
Pam Bondi served as Florida’s attorney general for eight years, and was in office when the legislature crafted its response to the 2018 shootings at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland.
“In a time of crisis, it’s about finding common ground, and that’s what Gov. Scott has done,” Bondi told Fox Business host Stuart Varney in March of that year, as the Florida legislature was in the midst of passing legislation that, among other things, raised the age to purchase a firearm from 18 to 21 and established a “red flag” law in the state.
During that same interview, Bondi praised Trump’s response to the Parkland shootings and expressed her hope that he could be a “mediator” with federal lawmakers.
“Hopefully Congress will follow Florida’s lead and what Gov. Scott has been doing here in Florida and all of us working so well together,” she told Varney as the interview concluded.
Even before Bondi tacitly embraced “red flag” laws and prohibiting young adults from purchasing firearms at retail, some 2A activists in Florida weren’t big fans of Bondi’s tenure as AG. Florida Carry’s general counsel Eric Friday expressed relief when current AG Ashley Moody took over the position in 2019.
“Ms. Bondi made numerous anti-gun decisions,” Friday said.
Bondi opposed a semiautomatic weapon ban in Connecticut after the Sandy Hook shooting and defended Florida’s controversial “stand your ground” law. But she also argued that stand your ground shouldn’t be used by police officers to defend their shootings.
In 2013, Bondi also defended the state’s law that prohibits people from openly carrying weapons, pitting her against Friday’s organization. Her handling of it prompted Hammer to reassure NRA members that Bondi was “a friend of our organizations.”
Bondi also defended the Legislature’s gun-control measures passed in the wake of the Parkland shooting, including a provision that outlawed anyone younger than 21 from buying a rifle or shotgun.
The NRA challenged the law and asked that a 19-year-old plaintiff be allowed to remain anonymous in the case so she could avoid potential harassment. After Bondi fought it, Hammer accused her of “bullying.”
Moody, it should be noted, has continued to defend the post-Parkland gun controls adopted by the Florida legislature and Scott. The NRA’s lawsuit challenging the age-based gun ban is currently pending in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, with oral arguments taking place last month.
Bondi is not an out-and-proud gun grabber, but she does come with some gun control baggage that’s likely to come up during her meet-and-greets with senators as well as her confirmation hearings. Would she, for instance, wholeheartedly defend the federal prohibition on handgun sales for adults younger than 21? Does she continue to believe that Congress should implement a federal gun violence restraining order like the one adopted in Florida six years ago? Would she side with the plaintiffs challenging semi-auto bans in Maryland, Illinois, New Jersey, California, and a handful of other states? And where does Bondi come down on the issue of restoring Second Amendment rights to those convicted of non-violent felony offenses?
So far none of the major 2A groups have commented on Bondi’s selection on social media, either in support or opposition to her nomination. Whether she’ll face any formal objections from Second Amendment organizations remains to be seen, and they may very well be holding off until they hear what Bondi herself has to say about the right to keep and bear arms as the confirmation process plays out.
Enterprise [Alabama] Police Department
On November 18, 2024, at 11:05 AM, EPD Officers responded to the 800 block of County Road 266 on a shooting call. At the scene, Officers located one male victim with injuries to his head and one deceased male individual with a gun-shot wound to the pelvic area. Witnesses advised the suspect attacked the victim with a metal pipe after a verbal altercation. During the attack, the victim fired a single shot at the suspect. The suspect, identified as Patrick John Cerqua, age 59, was pronounced deceased at the scene. This investigation is still ongoing and no further information will be released.
Well, Circuits (besides, of course the Supreme Court) are where actual binding ‘case law’ s made, so …….
Senate Dems and GOP strike a deal on judicial appointments for Trump and Biden
A deal struck earlier this week between Republicans and Democrats in the Senate will enable President Joe Biden to possibly outperform President-elect Donald Trump in terms of the number of federal judges appointed in each of their term in office.
“It looks like the Biden administration is going to best the first Trump administration in terms of the amount of judges that are seated on the federal courts by the end of his term,” Devon Westhill, president and general counsel at the Center for Equal Opportunity said, according to the Washington Examiner.
Senate Democrats have confirmed 220 of Biden’s federal judicial nominees, while Trump had 234 in his first term, according to the outlet.
So far Biden has confirmed 173 district court judges and 45 appeals court judges. Meanwhile, Trump confirmed 174 district judges and 54 appellate judges during his first term.
Regarding the Supreme Court, Trump appointed three justices and Biden one. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said Thursday that he wasn’t sure if Biden appointing more judges would top the number of Trump’s appointments.


