Chuck Schumer is one of the most powerful men in America.

He has no idea how to do basic male tasks like run a grill. Granted, he says he’s new to it here, but I’d bet a lot of money several family members and staffers saw this post before he posted it. Also, someone took this photo. None of them thought putting cheese on a raw patty was odd. That’s the type of company & advisors this man surrounds himself with.

He also wants to take your guns away from you. It’s pretty safe to say he knows about as much about guns, gun use, self defense, ballistics, etc… as he does about grilling.

That is all… 🤨Mr GunsNGear

Image

 

Longview man shot by homeowner after allegedly fleeing crash, trespassing in house

LONGVIEW, Texas (KLTV) – A man has died after allegedly running from the scene of a crash and then attempting to break into more than one home on Sunday.

At about 12:38 a.m., a hit-and-run crash was reported to officers in the area of George Richey and Fenton Road, according to a release from the Longview Police Department.

When police arrived, they said they found one person trapped in an SUV. The driver of the other vehicle had fled the scene on foot, according to witnesses.

About 20 minutes later, the police department received a call about someone attempting to trespass in a home in the 3600 block of Stracener. The reporting party told police that a man attempted to enter his house and then ran off once the resident confronted him with a gun.

Several minutes later, someone from the 3600 block of Clemens Road reported a person had entered their home and been shot by the resident. The first officers on scene immediately attempted life-saving measures on the injured man, later identified as Johan Nino, 23, of Longview, the release said. He was then taken to a hospital by Longview Fire EMS, but died from his injuries.

Police said it is believed that Nino was the driver who fled the initial crash scene and then attempted to break into other homes before entering the house on Clemens Road.

Police have said they will continue investigating this incident, and there are no criminal charges being filed against anyone else at this time.

Jeepintodd
I also noticed it was a biased response, avoiding answering the actual question. This already is a major problem for society as the majority of these Ai systems are continuously giving biased social engineering responses in favor of a leftist political spectrum. (em mine)

Notice that the AI actually doesn’t answer the question.
Garbage in/Garbage out

Biden Importing Venezuelan Gangs Into U.S.

President Joe Biden’s border crisis has criminals pouring into the United States, infiltrating themselves into communities across the nation that were once deemed a safe and family-friendly place to live.

However, thanks to Biden’s blatant ignorance and complete failure to secure the southern border, the U.S. has become a free-for-all, with over 17 million illegal immigrants entering the country since he took office nearly four years ago.

According to a report, the number of Venezuelan gang members illegally crossing the border unvetted by the Biden Department of Homeland Security is rising to an unprecedented amount. U.S. law enforcement and immigration officials launched more than 100 investigations into crimes related to Venezuelan gang members living in the country. The cases involve the Tren de Aragua gang, one of the deadliest gangs.

According to Customs and Border Protection data, roughly, 30,000 Venezuelans crossed the U.S. border last year and 800,000 have tried to enter the country since 2021. The amount of illegal Venezuelans who have successfully crossed the southern border went from 50,500 in fiscal year 2021 to 334,900 in fiscal year 2023.

The report states that the gang members enter the U.S. illegally with no identification and give a fake name, hometown, and age to authorities. The authorities then release the illegal immigrants into the country with nothing but an order to appear in court to hear their “asylum” claim— which could be years down the road.

The cases involve one of the deadliest gangs, the Tren de Aragua gang. The gang is known for forcing illegal Venezuelan immigrants into sex slavery to repay smugglers who helped them cross over the border and into the U.S. illegally without detection.

Last month, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) busted a sex trafficking scheme in Louisiana involving members from Tren de Aragua who reportedly forced Venezuelan women into sex trafficking to repay coyotes who smuggled them into the U.S.

Venezuelans were the majority of new arrivals who fled to Democratic cities such as Chicago, New York, and Denver.

In May, Border Patrol Chief Jason Owens confirmed the arrest of 10 illegal immigrants associated with the gang in Texas.

The FBI has warned that it is possible the gang could team up with the MS-13— a deadly gang that originated in Los Angeles.

 

Sotomayor’s Mistake

In her dissenting opinion in Cargill, Justice Sotomayor offers a concession that she may come to regret down the road:

On October 1, 2017, a shooter opened fire from a hotel room overlooking an outdoor concert in Las Vegas, Nevada, in what would become the deadliest mass shooting in U. S. history. Within a matter of minutes, using several hundred rounds of ammunition, the shooter killed 58 people and wounded over 500. He did so by affixing bump stocks to commonly available, semiautomatic rifles.

One of the important Second Amendment questions that has not yet been considered at length by the Supreme Court centers around which commercially available weapons ought to be counted within the provision’s definition of “arms.” The gun-control movement insists that modern sporting rifles such as the AR-15 are sufficiently exotic as to escape protection. Second Amendment advocates, by contrast, consider such a distinction to be arbitrary, reasoning that if semi-automatic handguns are protected, then there is no reason that semi-automatic rifles aren’t, too.

Since the Heller ruling in 2008, however, this debate has been focused more on whether AR-15s are mainstream than on whether they are functionally different than other guns. This is because, as Mark W. Smith explains:

The Supreme Court’s landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller established the “common use” test based on the text and original meaning of the Second Amendment and under the Supreme Court’s traditional role of enforcing national, constitutional baselines against local outliers.

The Heller court established the “common use” test to decide how a court should determine whether particular objects, or arms, should be protected by the Second Amendment. Specifically, do the arms being legislated or regulated constitute arms in “‘common use’… for lawful purposes like self-defense.”

To get around this problem, those who wish to ban the AR-15 have taken to claiming that the rifle is not, in fact, “in common use,” and that, as a result, it is not protected under the Second Amendment. Remarkably, Justice Sotomayor just pulled the rug from underneath that argument — and, to make matters worse, did so in an official Supreme Court opinion on the subject of firearms law. Look, again, at the language that Sotomayor uses to describe the AR-15:

He did so by affixing bump stocks to commonly available, semiautomatic rifles.

Sotomayor even uses the word “common”! Not “everyday” or “universal” or “normal” or “usual,” but common — the very word that was used in Heller.

Naturally, I do not expect Sotomayor to remain consistent. If, in the course of a case delineating the meaning of “arms,” she is asked to decide whether the AR-15 is in common use, she will undoubtedly insist that it is not. But, by the point at which she does so, her words will have been used over and over and over again — in the amicus briefs, during oral arguments, and perhaps in the majority opinion, too.

 

Yet they are doing exactly that to political opponents at this very moment. Steve Bannon for example.

DOJ Won’t Prosecute Merrick Garland For Contempt of Congress Over Biden Audio Tapes

The Justice Department won’t prosecute Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress over the Biden audio tapes.

The House of Representatives on Thursday voted to hold Merrick Garland in criminal contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena.

Last month two GOP-led House committees passed resolutions recommending US Attorney General Merrick Garland be held in contempt of Congress for refusing to hand over audio of Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur.

Merrick Garland has reportedly “classified at the highest level” the audio tapes of Joe Biden’s embarrassing interview with Special Counsel Hur. The tapes have been locked away in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), according to investigative journalist Paul Sperry.

To look a little deeper in the decision, Justice Alito’s concurrence is disturbing. He’s pretty much telling Congress to please pass a law banning them, which is strange coming from a justice well known for his pro-2nd amendment views. But even if he hadn’t signed onto the decision, it would still have been 5-4 majority.

I join the opinion of the Court because there is simply no other way to read the statutory language. There can be little doubt that the Congress that enacted 26 U. S. C. §5845(b) would not have seen any material difference between a machinegun and a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock. But the statutory text is clear, and we must follow it.

The horrible shooting spree in Las Vegas in 2017 did not change the statutory text or its meaning. That event demonstrated that a semiautomatic rifle with a bump stock can have the same lethal effect as a machinegun, and it thus strengthened the case for amending §5845(b).

But an event that highlights the need to amend a law does not itself change the law’s meaning. There is a simple remedy for the disparate treatment of bump stocks and machineguns.

Congress can amend the law—and perhaps would have done so already if ATF had stuck with its earlier interpretation.

Now that the situation is clear, Congress can act.

 

cargill v atf