May 5

553 – Concerned with the rise of Nestorianism in the Church, the Second Council of Constantinople, called by Emperor Justinian I, convenes.

1215 – Rebel barons renounce their allegiance to King John of England  beginning a chain of events leading to the signing of Magna Carta.

1260 – Kublai Khan becomes the 5th Khagan emperor of Mongolia, and then decrees a stately pleasure dome be built in Xanadu.

1494 – On his 2nd voyage to New World, Christopher Columbus sights Jamaica, landing at Discovery Bay

1809 – Mary Kies becomes the first woman awarded a U.S. patent, for a technique of weaving straw with silk and thread.

1821 – Napoleon dies in exile on the island of Saint Helena in the South Atlantic Ocean.

1862 – Mexican troops led by Ignacio Zaragoza halt a French invasion in the Battle of Puebla.

1865 – The government of The Confederate States of America is declared dissolved at Washington, Georgia.

1866 – Memorial Day is first celebrated at Waterloo, New York.

1877 – Sitting Bull leads his band of Hunkpapa Lakota Sioux into North- Western Territory  -now Saskatchewan- Canada to evade surrender to U.S. forces.

1893 – The financial Panic of 1893 causes a large crash on the New York Stock Exchange

1891 – The Music Hall in New York City (later Carnegie Hall) has its grand opening and first public performance with Pyotr Tchaikovsky as guest conductor.

1904 – Pitching against the Philadelphia Athletics at the Huntington Avenue Grounds in Boston, Cy Young of the Boston Americans throws the first perfect game – basically 9 innings with no batter from the opposing team reaching any base-  in the modern era of baseball.

1908 – Arthur Pickens riding aboard Stone Street wins the Kentucky Derby in 2 minutes, 15 1/5 seconds, setting a new, and to date unbeaten, record for the slowest winning time

1945 – A Fu-Go balloon bomb launched by the Japanese Army during World War II kills 6 people near Bly, Oregon.
Admiral Karl Dönitz, leader of Germany after Hitler’s death, orders all U-boats to cease offensive operations and return to their bases.

1946 – The International Military Tribunal for the Far East begins in Tokyo with 28 Japanese military and government officials accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

1955 – Under terms of The General Treaty, France, Britain and the United States return and recognize the sovereignty of West Germany.

1961 – Aboard Mercury Freedom 7, on a sub-orbital flight, Alan Shepard becomes the first American to travel into outer space.

1973 – Ron Turcotte aboard Secretariat wins the Kentucky Derby in 1 minute, 59 2/5th seconds, setting a new, and to date unbeaten, record for the fastest winning time

1987 – The Congressional  hearings on the Iran–Contra affair begin being televised.

1994 – American teenager Michael P. Fay is caned in Singapore for theft and vandalism.

2013– 5 members of a bridal party are killed after their limousine catches fire on the San Mateo-Hayward bridge in Hayward, California

2018 – The first death from a vaping product occurs when an electric cigarette explodes, penetrating his head and killing Tallmadge D’Elia, age 38, in his apartment in St. Petersburg, Florida,

Americans Have Something to Say That Biden Won’t Like to Hear

President Joe Biden and his gun control advisors won’t like this news.

One of the most consistently accurate and reputable polling organizations found more Americans oppose one of the president’s top gun control goals than support it. Monmouth found nearly half of Americans – 49 percent – oppose a federal ban on so-called “assault weapons.”

The poll was released just days after the president once again called for a national ban on Modern Sporting Rifles (MSRs).

It’s a Trend

“In 1994, I led the fight to successfully ban assault weapons… We know the solution. Congressional Republicans need to show some courage,” President Joe Biden tweeted last month.

The American public, though, is saying not-so-fast. The Monmouth poll reveals Americans don’t want a ban. It’s a trend and the new data represents a nine-point drop in support for a federal ban on America’s most popular-selling centerfire semiautomatic rifle in almost a year. The new polling also represents a seven-point increase in opposition to a ban.

The Quinnipiac poll even showed a majority of Americans – 51 percent – opposed a ban. “While President Joe Biden is calling on Congress to renew the long-expired ban on assault weapons, the public now is divided on the question…,” that report stated.

Continue reading “”

Detroit City Council to consider gun-free zones as advocates push back

Advocates Scotty Boman, Rick Ector and Ryan Brennan are urging Detroit City Council to vote against a resolution that would create gun-free zones in Detroit.Advocates Scotty Boman, Rick Ector and Ryan Brennan are urging Detroit City Council to vote against a resolution that would create gun-free zones in Detroit.© Dana Afana

Detroit City Council members on Tuesday postponed a vote on a resolution to establish gun-free zones in certain high-traffic parts of the city.

Councilmember Mary Waters pushed the resolution back to committee where members can further discuss proposed changes. The resolution calls for urging the Michigan Legislature to repeal the Firearm and Ammunition Act 319 of 1990 since Detroit is not allowed to establish the zones under current state gun laws. At a meeting in April, Waters proposed gun-free zones in areas that include the Detroit riverfront, Greektown, Hart Plaza, Spirit of Detroit Plaza and Campus Martius. Shootings have occurred in the downtown area in recent weekends as the weather warms toward summer and more people head outside.

In pushing for the change, Waters said parents need to ensure their children conduct themselves responsibly, urging guns in a household with children “should be locked up and stored so children cannot gain access.”

But Scotty Boman, founder of Detroit Residents Advancing Civilian Oversight, said despite council members being well-intentioned, such a move would have adverse effects.

“I don’t believe the correct response to the violence that we have had in our city is to deny basic liberties to the residents, and specifically the idea of making Greektown into a gun-free zone is not going to help make anyone safer and it is an infringement of people’s basic rights,” said Boman, who gathered on Monday in Greektown with other gun rights supporters. “The fact of the matter is that criminals don’t care about the law. If we set up checkpoints on public streets, that’s yet another thing, now we’re talking about search and seizure rights. … I think it’s best to have responsible gun owners who can actually respond and help protect and help stop active shooters.”

Boman, alongside National Rifle Association member Rick Ector and Wayne County Libertarian Party member Ryan Brennan, said it punishes individuals without ensuring safety.

No charges to be filed after man claims self-defense in fatal Keene shooting
Attorney general’s office say prosecutors would be unable to disprove self-defense claim

Almost one year after a man shot and killed another man outside his Keene home, investigators said Wednesday that no charges will be filed.

Shane Frazier said he acted in self-defense when he shot and killed Kristopher Chagnon, 27, in May 2022. Officials with the attorney general’s office said there was insufficient evidence to disprove that.

Investigators said witnesses told them that before the shooting, Frazier found one of his children next door, which upset him. After Frazier and his child went home, a group of people followed them, standing outside his door, and one of them went into the house.

Investigators said Frazier told police he grabbed his gun at that point and got ready to fire. He said he told the group never to come inside his home again.

Frazier told investigators that’s when Chagnon ran up the stairs, pushed the door open and got in Frazier’s face. Frazier told police he warned Chagnon several times to get back or he would shoot and eventually fired the gun.

Investigators said that there was some evidence supporting Frazier’s self-defense claim, but there is also differing information police got from witnesses, as well as a lack of objective evidence for self-defense. But the attorney general’s office determined that prosecutors would be unable to meet their burden of disproving Frazier’s claim of self-defense at trial.

‘Assault Weapon’ Bans Look More Legally Vulnerable Than Ever
A preliminary injunction in Illinois may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud.
Supporters of "assault weapon" bans insist that the weapons they cover are good for nothing but mass murder.

These two guns fire the same ammunition at the same rate with the same muzzle velocity. But the one on top is an “assault weapon,” and the one on the bottom isn’t. (Illustration: Lex Villena)

Three days after Washington became the 10th state to enact an “assault weapon” ban, a federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a similar law in Illinois. That decision, which was published last Friday, may signal the demise of a long-running public policy fraud that falsely depicts an arbitrarily defined category of semi-automatic rifles as good for nothing but mass murder.

“Assault weapon” bans, which typically cover specific models along with features such as adjustable stocks, pistol grips, flash suppressors, and barrel shrouds, have always been logically dubious. And under the constitutional test that the Supreme Court recently established, they look more legally vulnerable than ever.

These laws never made much sense. With or without the features that states such as Washington and Illinois have deemed intolerable, a rifle fires the same ammunition at the same rate with the same muzzle velocity.

Even President Joe Biden, who wants Congress to revive the federal “assault weapon” ban that expired in 2004, has conceded that the law left would-be killers with plenty of alternatives that were “just as deadly.” And contrary to the claim that the rifles targeted by this sort of legislation are the “weapon of choice” in mass shootings, handguns account for more than three-quarters of the firearms used in such crimes and an even larger share of the firearms used in gun homicides generally.

The Supreme Court’s precedents suggest that “assault weapon” bans are unconstitutional as well as illogical. The Court has said the Second Amendment applies to firearms that are commonly used for lawful purposes, and last June it explicitly rejected the sort of “interest-balancing” test that lower courts had previously used to uphold “assault weapon” bans.

Instead of weighing a law’s purported public safety benefits against the burdens it imposes, the justices said, courts should ask whether it is “consistent with this Nation’s tradition of firearm regulation.” In a federal lawsuit they filed immediately after Washington enacted its “assault weapon” ban last week, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) argue that the state cannot meet that test.

“The only historical tradition that can remove a firearm from the Second Amendment’s protective scope,” the complaint says, is “the tradition of banning dangerous and unusual weapons.” But that category does not include “arms that are in common use” for legal purposes, “as the firearms Washington has banned unquestionably are.”

The SAF and the FPC note that AR-15 style rifles covered by Washington’s law “are among the most popular firearms in the nation, and they are owned by millions of Americans.” They cite survey data indicating that “about 24.6 million Americans have owned AR-15 or similar modern semiautomatic rifles.”

The SAF and the FPC made the same argument in Illinois, and U.S. District Judge Stephen P. McGlynn found it persuasive. In granting a preliminary injunction against that state’s “assault weapon” ban, McGlynn concluded that the law was probably inconsistent with the right to keep and bear arms, adding that Illinois legislators seem to have ignored that likelihood and the Supreme Court decisions underlying it.

In the survey cited by the SAF and the FPC, two-thirds of the respondents who reported owning AR-15-style rifles said they used them for recreational target shooting, while half mentioned hunting and a third mentioned competitive shooting. Sixty-two percent said they used the rifles for home defense, and 35 percent cited defense outside the home.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, nevertheless insists these rifles “have no reason other than mass murder,” because “their only purpose is to kill humans as rapidly as possible in large numbers.” Illinois Senate President Don Harmon (D–Oak Park) likewise maintains that killing innocent people is the “only intent” of the rifles his state banned.

Ascribing intent to inanimate objects reflects the magical thinking of politicians who argue that certain guns are inherently evil. That position is plainly at odds with a reality that courts may no longer be able to ignore.

James Comer and Chuck Grassley have just released a statement claiming the FBI has proof showing then-Vice President Joe Biden committed bribery in exchange for policy decisions with a foreign national.

Image

FBI Record Allegedly Reveals Biden Was Engaged In Criminal Bribery Scheme With Foreign National

In a new development, an unclassified whistleblower disclosure received by the United States Congress has revealed that the Federal Bureau of Investigation possesses a record allegedly linking former Vice President Joe Biden to a criminal bribery scheme with a foreign national.

In a letter to FBI Director Christopher Wray and Attorney General Merrick Garland, the whistleblower documents describe the alleged scheme in detail, including the exchange of money for policy decisions.

Senator Chuck Grassley and Representative James Comer, in a joint statement, said that “The DOJ and the FBI appear to have valuable, verifiable information that you have failed to disclose to the American people. Therefore, Congress will proceed to conduct an independent and objective review of this matter, free from those agencies’ influence.”

The scheme suggests as Vice President, Biden abused his position for personal gain. “Transparency brings accountability,” the letter finished.

May 4

1415 – Religious reformers John Wycliffe and Jan Hus are condemned as heretics at the Council of Constance in present day Germany.

1493 – Pope Alexander VI divides the New World between Spain and Portugal along the Line of Demarcation,  a meridian 370 leagues west of the Cape Verde islands, off the west coast of Africa, that will be later defined in the Treaty of Tordesillas

1626 – Dutch explorer Peter Minuit arrives in New Netherland, present day Manhattan Island, aboard the See Meeuw.

1776 – Rhode Island becomes the first American colony to renounce allegiance to King George III.

1871 – The National Association, the first professional baseball league, opens its first season in Fort Wayne, Indiana with the Fort Wayne Kekiongas winning over the Cleveland Forest Citys, 2-0.

1886 – A bomb is thrown at policemen trying to break up a labor rally at Haymarket Square in Chicago, killing 12 people, 7 of which are police officers, and wounding 60 more.

1904 – The United States begins construction of the Panama Canal.

1927 – The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences is incorporated in Beverly Hills, California.

1932 – At United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, mobster Alphonse Capone begins serving an 11 year prison sentence for tax evasion.

1942 – During World War II, the Battle of the Coral Sea begins with an attack by aircraft from the carrier USS Yorktown on Japanese naval forces which had occupied Tulagi in the Solomon Islands the previous day.

1945 – During World War II, at Lüneburg Heath in northern Germany, Commander in Chief of the German navy Admiral Hans-Georg von Friedeburg and Colonel Fritz Poleck representing the Oberkommando der Wehrmacht, sign surrender documents for all Wehrmacht units in the Netherlands, Denmark and northwest Germany.

1946 – At Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary, San Francisco Bay, U.S. Marines stop a 2 day riot with 5 people killed.

1953 – Ernest Hemingway wins the Pulitzer Prize for The Old Man and the Sea.

1961 – U.S. Navy Commander Malcolm Ross and Lt. Commander Victor Prather attain a new altitude record for manned balloon flight, ascending in the Strato-Lab V open gondola to 113,740 feet over the Gulf of Mexico, while also testing a prototype pressure suit later used by Project Mercury astronauts. Commander Prather unfortunately drowns during helicopter recovery operations.

1970 – At Kent State University, Ohio, National Guard troops open fire on demonstrators protesting the Vietnam War, killing 4 students and wounding 9 others.

1972 – The “Don’t Make A Wave Committee”, an environmental organization founded in Canada in 1971, officially changes its name to the  “Greenpeace Foundation”.

1973 – The 108 story Sears Tower in Chicago is topped out at 1,451 feet becoming the world’s tallest building at the time.

1982 – During the Falklands War, 20 Royal Navy sailors are killed when the British destroyer HMS Sheffield is hit by an Exocet missile fired from an Argentinian Super Étendard fighter aircraft.

1988 – Near Henderson, Nevada, several tons of Space Shuttle solid fuel detonate during a fire at the PEPCON chemical plant, killing 2 people, injuring over 370 more and causing over $100 million in damages.

1989 – As part of the Iran–Contra affair, former White House aide Lt. Colonel Oliver North USMC is convicted on 3 charges and acquitted of 9 others with the convictions later overturned on appeal.

1998 – A federal judge in Sacramento, California, sentences “Unabomber” Theodore Kaczynski to 4 life sentences plus 30 years after Kaczynski accepts a plea agreement sparing him from the death penalty.

2003 – A supercell thunderstorm beginning in Oklahoma, spawning 86 tornados, enters southwest Missouri, with 1 tornado plastering the center of the town of Pierce City, traveling north of the town of Aurora and ending after going through and nearly destroying the center of the town of Battlefield along with several residential subdivisions, killing 5 people and another tornado hitting the town of Carl Junction before dissipating, killing 2 more people.

2007 – An EF5 tornado hits Greensburg, Kansas, destroying most of the town and killing 11 people.

Missouri: Committee to Hear Postponed Public Transit Self-Defense & Church Carry Bill

Tomorrow, Today at 8:30AM, the Senate Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety Committee will hear House Bill 282, to ensure law-abiding citizens may carry firearms for self-defense on public transit and to allow places of worship to make their own security decisions. This bill was previously scheduled for last week and got postponed. Please contact committee members and ask them to SUPPORT HB 282.

House Bill 282 repeals arbitrary “gun-free zones” that do nothing to hinder criminals, while leaving law-abiding citizens defenseless. It removes the prohibition on law-abiding citizens carrying firearms for self-defense on public transit property and in vehicles. This ensures that citizens with varying commutes throughout their day, and of various economic means, are able to exercise their Second Amendment rights and defend themselves.

The bill also repeals the prohibition in state law against carrying firearms for self-defense in places of worship. This empowers private property owners to make such decisions regarding security on their own, rather than the government mandating a one-size-fits-all solution.

Suspect In Texas Massacre Arrested After Days-Long Manhunt

Law enforcement agents arrested a person believed to be responsible for killing five of his neighbors with a rifle in their Texas home. A person believed to be Francisco Oropesa, 38, was apprehended in Cut and Shoot, Texas, according to multiple reports.

Oropesa is and illegal alien who has been deported multiple times.

Officials said they’re awaiting fingerprints to confirm the person arrested is Oropesa, who has been taken to the Montgomery County Jail and charged with first-degree murder.

The FBI, and others, had offered a $80,000 reward for information. It was unclear if the apprehension was based off a tip form the public.

The incident occurred four days ago when Oropesa went to the Trails End area home in Cleveland, approximately 45 miles north of Houston, and opened fire, according to the San Jacinto County Sheriff’s Office.

Oropesa allegedly opened fire on neighbors after one complained that shots coming from his adjacent property were keeping an infant from sleeping.

 

Is SCOTUS ready to step in on an “assault weapons” ban?

Since the Bruen decision was delivered last June, the Supreme Court has been largely content to let lower courts wrestle with the opinion and what it means for the future of gun control laws like a ban on so-called assault weapons or even the new concealed carry restrictions put in place by the state of New York after its “may issue” regime was struck down by SCOTUS in Bruen. Now the Court is being asked to weigh in on an “assault weapons” ban imposed by the city of Naperville, Illinois, and Second Amendment advocates are hoping that at least four justices are ready and willing to take up the request for an injunction.

The National Association for Gun Rights is hoping the Supreme Court will do what the Seventh Circuit did not; put a halt to Naperville’s gun ban while the case plays out in court. On Monday afternoon, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett directed Naperville officials to respond to NAGR’s request no later than noon on May 8th. Coincidentally (or not), that’s the same day that U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn has told the plaintiffs in the challenge to the statewide ban on “assault weapons” to reply to Illinois’ request to stay his injunction against the “assault weapons” and “large capacity” magazine ban, which was handed down last week.

The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), in conjunction with the National Foundation for Gun Rights (NFGR),says the law conflicts with the high court’s NYSRPA v. Bruen decision last year, which ruled gun laws must align with constitutional text and history.

Well, that’s not gonna happen. The bigger question is whether the Supreme Court will step in now or wait for another case involving a ban on so-called assault weapons to reach its doorstep.

Continue reading “”

Not a Second-Class Right – The Second Amendment

On July 25, 2022 the Second Amendment rightfully rejoiced about an historic decision from the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). In this now famous case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen, (now commonly referred to as Bruen) the court dropped the hammer on the bigotry the 2A Community has faced for far too long.

In that ruling, the court reiterated an earlier statement form SCOTUS regarding the Second Amendment in a case referred to as McDonald: “The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right, subject to an entirely different body of rules than the other Bill of Rights guarantees.” McDonald, 561 U. S., at 780”

In Bruen, the court went even further declaring: “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need. That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.”

These were very groundbreaking and profound statements from the highest court in the U.S. It should have meant the immediate end of modern gun control as we know it. Sadly, those of us who have been in the trenches for a long time knew it wouldn’t be. Like many other communities that have faced social bigotry in the past, we knew the anti-civil rights crowd would fight to create scorched earth policies for lawful citizens.

There is one piece of this that really hasn’t been talked about. The phrase: “The constitutional right to bear arms in public for self-defense is not “a second-class right…”

As simple as it sounds, is it really? What does that one statement mean to the rest of Bill of Rights? The 2A Community needs to be shouting loud and clear that the ruling clearly means that whatever government does to the Second, it must also apply to every civil right, period! Imagine the true breadth of this.

If government, as a nation or state, places restrictions on or precents you entirely from exercising your Second Amendment civil rights, then why should we trust you to vote intelligently and responsibly? How about sitting on a jury? If we are not supposed to trust you with a gun, why would we ever trust you to dispense justice fairly? If, for example, a single drunk driving conviction with no jail time permanently revokes your Second Amendment rights, why should it no revoke all the rest.

Imagine all those people who believe healthcare and higher education are civil rights. Now imagine the public outcry if they were to lose those rights because they were declared “unsuitable”? There would be riots in the streets and possibly a real insurrection.

What if anyone running for any public office had to meet the local standards and restrictions faced by the 2A community? After all, if someone is not eligible under local laws to exercise their 2A civil rights, then why should they have the ability to pass laws about it? How interesting would it be for the local police chief to have suitability authority over political candidates.

If all of this seems a little far-fetched it is only because the Second Amendment being treated as a true civil right is sadly a brand-new concept. If indeed the Second is not a “second class” civil right, which it is not, then there is going to have to be a profound awaking across the board with all civil rights. Moving forward, the message from the 2A community to government officials everywhere and the anti-civil rights crowd: “Whatever you do to us, you must do to everyone and every civil right, period. If what you propose is not acceptable for any other civil rights, then it is not acceptable for the Second!”

May 3

1802 – Washington, D.C. is incorporated as a city after Congress abolishes the Board of Commissioners, the District’s founding government. The “City of Washington” is given a mayor-council form of government.

1855 – American adventurer William Walker mounts a private military expedition,  departing from San Francisco with 60 men to conquer Nicaragua.

1901 – The ‘Great Fire of 1901’ in Jacksonville, Florida begins when sparks from the chimney of a nearby building start a fire at the Cleaveland Fibre Factory, eventually burning down 146 city blocks and killing 7 people.

1921 – West Virginia becomes the first state to legislate a sales tax.

1942 – During World War II, Japanese naval troops invade Tulagi in the Solomon Islands during the first part of Operation Mo. 

1948 – In  the case of Shelley v. Kraemer, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that covenants prohibiting the sale of real estate to blacks and other minorities are legally unenforceable.

1951 – The Senate Committee on Armed Services and the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations begin closed door hearings into the relief of General of The Army Douglas MacArthur by President Truman.

1952 – USAF Lieutenant Colonel Joseph O. Fletcher and William P. Benedict make the first landing of a U.S. plane at the North Pole..

1957 – Walter O’Malley, the owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, agrees to move the team from Brooklyn to Los Angeles.

1968 – Braniff International Airways Flight 352, a Lockheed L-188 Electra, breaks up in midair after flying through a thunderstorm and crashes near Dawson, Texas, killing all 85 passengers and crew aboard.

1978 – The first unsolicited bulk commercial email , now known as “spam” is sent by a Digital Equipment Corporation marketing representative to every ARPANET address on the west coast of the United States.

1979 – Margaret Thatcher wins the United Kingdom general election becoming the first female British Prime Minister.

1999 – A tornado of the 1999 Oklahoma tornado outbreak, measured at the highest wind speed ever recorded of 301 mph, hits the southwestern portion of Oklahoma City, killing 45 people, injuring 665 more, and causing $1 billion in damage.

2000 – The sport of geocaching begins, with the first cache placed and the  GPS coordinates posted on Usenet.

2015 – Both gunmen who launch an attack on the “First Annual Muhammad Art Exhibit and Contest” at the Curtis Culwell Center in Garland, Texas,  barely make it out of their vehicle before being ignominiously gunned down in the street by an off duty Garland police officer, hired as a security guard.

THEY WANT A FIGHT
SO LET’S GIVE IT TO ’EM!

It will have been one year on June 23 since the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its landmark ruling in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen and ever since, anti-gun Democrats have been acting like the decision never happened.

A state House representative in Olympia, Wash. may have pegged the reason why during an interview with me back in January. His analysis was matter-of-fact, entirely sensible and a little scary.

The $10,000 Secret

The gun control crowd wants a fight. They are determined to wage a war of perpetual litigation if necessary to have their way — or at least make sure you don’t get your way — at the expense of taxpayers rather than acknowledge they’ve been wrong about the Second Amendment.

Rep. Jim Walsh, from the Evergreen State’s Grays Harbor area along the Pacific Coast has watched them.

“That’s the dangerous thing,” he said about the gun prohibition mindset. “They have a blind spot on this issue. The profound question is whether it’s an ideological position or a political calculation.”

Either way, gun owners cannot allow them to win.

Continue reading “”

Supreme Court Requests Brief in Case Against Illinois Town’s ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban

Naperville, Illinois, will have to defend its ban on the sale of AR-15s and similar firearms before the Supreme Court.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who oversees the circuit the case against the ban is happening in, asked the city to respond to an emergency request for an injunction against the ordinance on Monday. That means at least one justice wants to hear more about the case before the High Court decides whether or not to weigh in. The city has until May 8th to answer claims that the ban violates the Constitution.

“We’re thankful the Supreme Court is taking the Second Amendment rights of Illinoisans seriously,” Dudley Brown of the National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR), a plaintiff in the case, said in a statement.

The move may indicate the Court is getting closer to taking up a case against so-called assault weapons bans. After it handed down a new test for gun cases in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen, the Court ordered the Fourth Circuit to rehear a case upholding Maryland’s ban. Federal judges have been split on whether the bans violate the Second Amendment under the new test, opening the door for potential Supreme Court intervention and clarification.

Illinois enacted a statewide ban earlier this year, but it has since been blocked in state and federal court. It has also faced substantial backlash from Illinois sheriffs, a majority of which say they won’t enforce the ban because they consider it unconstitutional.

NAGR was denied a preliminary injunction against the Naperville ordinance in February, and the Seventh Circuit rejected the gun-rights group’s request to block enforcement of the law while its appeal is being processed. Now, the group is making the same request to the Supreme Court.

If the Court does issue an injunction against the ordinance, it will signal similar bans adopted by ten states are unconstitutional. That could upend the debate over gun control in America, which has largely centered around prohibitions on the AR-15 and similar guns. But, while Barrett’s request for a brief increases the odds the case will see action, most cases where briefs are requested do not get a full hearing.

NAGR said it is confident it will prevail in the case, though.

“Any ban on so-called ‘Assault Weapons’ is plainly unconstitutional, and now it is on the city of Naperville to explain the legal justification for their ban,” Brown said. “Of course, there isn’t any. The bans were ludicrous from the start, and if Illinois had any sense, they would wave the white flag now and save us all some time.”

Naperville did not respond to a request for comment.