Let me rephrase this. Supposed I handed you $1 Million dollars in cash to hold and keep safe for me every Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. And the place where you work and keep this treasure safe is public property — or at least open to the public. The building is not built like a bank or courthouse. It has no armed guards at all doors or other elevated security — other than a sign warning people about bringing weapons on to the property. Bad people know these facts.

Now let me add that 20 to 25 other people also hand you $1 Million dollars in cash as well, under the same conditions. Which means every Monday through Friday, from 8 to 3, you are holding and taking care of $25 Million. This is your job, you have promised to return the money, safely, to all the people every day at 3 p.m.

Now do you want to be armed?

An online acquaintance often toys with AI to see how it ‘thinks’.

I tried this out with Bing’s Copilot to see what it would produce about the legal view that a $0 tax on NFA guns could be used in court against the NFRTR registry. My text is in bold black blockquote. It so happens, Copilot has similar views to many of the greater legal minds out there. (Not really surprised.) Also note it’s flattering tone.

Continue reading “”

“It is bad enough that so many people believe things without any evidence. What is worse is that some people have no conception of evidence and regard facts as just someone else’s opinion.”
– Thomas Sowell

They didn’t make a movie about this but several episodes of Stargate SG-1 sure had a very similar plot i.e. sterilize the population

Czech Study Finds Covid Vaccine Linked to One-Third Drop in Fertility Among Women.

A steady stream of reports is now developing that suggests Covid vaccinations may indeed hurt fertility and pregnancy outcomes.

I reported on a rat study that clearly showed fertility was impacted after the animals were injected with mRNA Covid vaccines. A recently published study (not peer reviewed yet) looking at data from Israeli women found a substantially higher-than-expected number of eventual fetal losses associated with Covid vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13.

A newly published peer-reviewed study analyzing nationwide data from the Czech Republic has reported a significant association between Covid vaccination and reduced fertility rates in women of childbearing age. The study, which examined approximately 1.3 million women aged 18–39 between January 2021 and December 2023, found that women who received the Covid vaccine before conception had a substantially lower rate of successful conceptions (“SC”, i.e., pregnancies that resulted in live births) compared to their unvaccinated counterparts.

The article, entitled Rates of Successful Conceptions According to COVID-19 Vaccination Status: Data from the Czech Republic, began by noting that adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination on menstrual cycles have been documented, and there was limited population-level data on how vaccination might relate to birth rates. The researchers aimed to fill this gap by comparing SC rates between women vaccinated and unvaccinated against Covid before conception.

Researchers analyzed monthly data from January 2021 to December 2023, including vaccination status and live births for women in the target age group. SC rates per 1,000 women were calculated for both preconception-vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, as well as for the overall population.

The results were jaw-dropping:

  • By the end of 2021, about 70% of women in this age group were vaccinated.
  • From June 2021 onward, SC rates per 1,000 women were significantly lower for those vaccinated before conception than for unvaccinated women.
  • The SC rate for vaccinated women was much lower than expected based on their share of the population (i.e., a 33% or one-third decrease).
  • In 2022, SC rates stabilized, but remained approximately 1.5 times higher in unvaccinated women compared to vaccinated women
While the findings suggest a sustained association between covid vaccination prior to conception and lower SC rates, it must be noted that the study does not establish causality. Possible explanations include self-selection bias (e.g., women planning pregnancy may have avoided vaccination), but this does not fully account for the observed trends, as overall fertility rates also declined during the period.

The authors also point out additional limitations, including a lack of data on confounders like age, socioeconomic status, health, and fertility intentions.

That being said, the results are preliminary and hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further research into the potential effects of covid vaccination on human fertility. However, until these studies are conducted with no Big Pharma bias nor conducted in ways that are designed to promote the preferred political bias, all women should weigh these recent reports as part of their personal risk assessment.

Truly, personal risk assessment has never been more critical. Covid cases now resemble a bad cold in most healthy people. Women of childbearing age and parents of young girls should weigh seriously the real-world consequences of infection against the potential loss of fertility.

As Hot Air’s David Strom observes, pushing the vaccines when any of this was suspected is a crime against humanity.

How many women will be robbed of fertility? It is impossible to say. What we do know is that each and every one of them was lied to in a manner that we define as a crime against humanity. We also know that in cases asymptotically close to zero, the women did not benefit from the vaccine. They were at almost no risk from COVID, and now they have lost their future children.

The government-generated mass panic was evil. The forced closures of much of our economy were evil. The “comply or die” measures were evil. School closures were evil. Setting people against each other was evil. The forced vaccinations were evil. The lies were evil.

This study should be front-page news, and talked about 24/7/365 until people get it through their heads that the people who run our lives are not “experts,” but budding tyrants so drunk with power that they experimented on every person in the world without worrying about the damage they could do.

And over at Ace of Spades HQ, there is a reminder that any of us who tried to express these concerns were silenced.

People screamed that this entirely untested, experimental gene-slicing “vaccine therapy” could have serious consequences that were entirely unknown.

They were chased off the internet and subjected to government punishment.

“Trust us,” they said. “We’re the Experts and we’re here to play savior.”

 

My hope is that all the damage caused by the Covid pandemic policies can eventually be undone. Until then, I am bracing for more troubling findings from serious researchers willing to ask the hard questions and bravely present their analyses.

Medicaid? She’s a multimillionaire and her father, Jim Klobuchar, passed back in 2021.

24 years after 9/11 and Noo Yawk goes for this….

Zohran Mamdani: “VioIence is an Artificial Construction”

New York City’s Democratic voters chose Zohran Mamdani as their nominee. It says a lot about how bad Mamdani is, though, that a lot of people thought the allegedly handsy former governor of New York, who left office in disgrace, was a better option, but the voters have spoken.

While it’s entirely possible someone else will prevail in the general election, the odds are good that Mamdani will win based on current polling.

There’s a lot for me to dislike about Mamdani, including his previous call to ban all guns, but a lot of New Yorkers aren’t going to disagree with that on any level, unfortunately, and since I can’t vote against him, my own feelings are irrelevant.

But there’s a reason everyone in the Big Apple should be concerned, and that’s just how soft on crime he’s shaping up to be.

For example, he says that violence is an artificial construct.

Now, I get that he’s claiming that non-violent crimes are being prosecuted as acts of violence, even when they’re not, but I’m rather skeptical of that claim without some hard evidence backing it up. [Editor’s Note: New York actually prosecutes gun possession without a permit as a violent crime, so there is some evidence that’s the case – Cam]

Breaking into a business that has an attached but separate dwelling isn’t likely to be viewed as the same as breaking into a home in court. I seriously doubt a prosecutor would even try it.

Of course, sometimes horrible things happen. Vile people do vile things, even if they work in a prosecutor’s office or with law enforcement. I get that.

But the language here matters.

Mamdani could have just started off by arguing that people are overprosecuted and left it there. That’s something people will likely rally behind and something that his opponents will have a hard time attacking him for.

Instead, though, he says “violence is an artificial construction,” which is the kind of language we hear in a lot of other debates. Gender is an artificial construct. Gender roles are an artificial construct. Even rights have been termed as artificial constructs.

In short, the term “artificial construct” or “artificial construction” is a common buzzword used for undermining the mere existence of a thing.

Violence, on the other hand, isn’t. How we define “good” and “bad” forms of violence might be, but the act of being violent is no such thing. It’s an objective fact that violence happens, that people do it to others, and victims get hurt as a result.

This isn’t artificial, nor is it constructed.

What Mamdani is doing, even if unintentionally, is laying the groundwork to excuse violent crime entirely because if it’s an artificial construction, then there’s no reason to punish it beyond our need to uphold this artificial construction. Since it’s clear he’s hostile toward such artificial constructions, it seems that he favors violence not being punished.

It’s a reasonable extrapolation, after all.

Overprosecution, which may or may not be happening, isn’t a case of violence being an artificial construction. It’s a case of prosecutors crossing the line from what is acceptable and just to injustice and unacceptability.

Mamdani’s entire argument, however, hinges on this idea, which means that it’s a good thing the Bruen decision put an end to shall-issue permitting in New York City, because New Yorkers are probably going to need those guns pretty soon if he’s elected.