November 5

1605 – Guy Fawkes is discovered hiding under Parliament in London along with enough barrels of gunpowder to blow the building to smithereens.

1688 – Prince William III of Orange lands with a Dutch fleet at Brixham to challenge the rule of King James II of England, the beginning of the ‘Glorious Revolution’, one result being the establishment of the English Bill Of Rights, a direct predecessor and inspiration to an improvement; the U.S. Bill Of Rights

1768 – The Treaty of Fort Stanwix is signed between the Iroqois and the British, which adjusted and set the boundary line between Indian lands and the Colonies along the Ohio River to the Tennessee River at the end of the French and Indian War

1831 – Nat Turner, American slave leader, is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death in Virginia for rebellion and insurrection.

1862 – In Minnesota, 303 Santee Lakota warriors are found guilty of rape and murder of whites during the U.S.-Dakota War, and are sentenced to death. 38 are ultimately hanged by direct order of President Lincoln, and the others reprieved

1872 – Suffragette Susan B. Anthony votes for the first time, in defiance of New York state law, and is later fined $100.

1895 – George B. Selden is granted the first U.S. patent for an automobile

1912 – Woodrow Wilson is elected the 28th President of the United States

1940 – Franklin D. Roosevelt is the first and only President of the United States to be elected to a third term.

1968 – Richard Nixon is elected as 37th President of the United States.

1986 – The Frigate USS Rentz, Cruiser USS Reeves and Destroyer USS Oldendorf pay a port call at Tsing Tao, China – the first US Naval visit to China since 1949.

1996 – Bill Clinton is reelected President of the United States.

2006 – Saddam Hussein, the former president of Iraq, is sentenced to death in the al-Dujail trial for the 1982 massacre of 148 Shia Muslims.

2007 – The Android ‘smart phone’ operating system is unveiled by Google.

2009 – Shouting Allahu Ackbar, U.S. Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan kills 13 soldiers and wounds another 32 at Fort Hood, Texas. He is later tried, convicted and sentenced to death, which has yet to be executed.

2017 – Devin Patrick Kelley kills 26 people and wounds another 20 in a church in Sutherland Springs, Texas before being confronted, engaged and wounded by Stephen Willford and finally committing suicide.

2021 – A crowd crush during the first night of the 2021 Astroworld Music Festival at NRG Park in Houston, Texas results in the death of 10 people with 25 more injured

A Second American Civil War Has Begun

Partisan politics in Washington, D.C. are hindering the government’s ability to function effectively.

The investigations into former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden are causing serious division and tearing the country apart.

A Reuters/Ipsos opinion poll found that roughly half of Americans believe the investigations into Donald Trump are politically motivated.

Republican lawmakers argue that these investigations are necessary to root out corruption, while Democrats make similar claims about Trump.

Rep. Virginia Foxx, (R-N.C) said, “The sequence of events that led to the firing of Viktor Shokin, and the subsequent comments by then-Vice President Biden, raise serious concerns as to what machinations were really at play — and were purposefully concealed from the American people. No matter how you slice Hunter Biden’s involvement, it screams public corruption at the highest levels and must be fully investigated.”

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-Louisiana) added, “The calm, judicious, steady reveal of incredibly condemning evidence that clearly incriminates the Biden crime family will eventually alarm even the most ardent supporters of this WH occupier.”

‘Our president is compromised, he should resign and be forever condemned, and the Democrat Party should begin rebuilding itself.”

“Everything we are uncovering points to Hunter Biden using his name and his father’s position to get rich,” said Rep. William Timmons (R-S.C.).

“It’s bribery — and it is both wrong and illegal. House Democrats, the legacy media, and even top brass at the FBI and DOJ failed to do their job and investigate all the literal and figurative smoke that clouds Hunter Biden. House Republicans will do our job and uncover the truth.”

Beginning on January 20, 2011, then-Vice President Joe Biden wrote a personal letter to Archer to thank him for the business opportunity. The smoking-gun evidence has been analyzed and authenticated.

“What was he thanking you for?” political commentator Tucker Carlson asked.

“It was kind of the beginning of our partnership, and he was thanking me and thanking Hunter,” Archer said. “I think, at the end of the day for bringing this idea of this government regulatory strategic advisory business into the private equity world. And I think he was excited about the prospects for Hunter, and he was just thanking me. I think it was a nice gesture.”

Archer testified at the House Oversight Committee and confirmed that Hunter put his father, then-Vice President Joe Biden, on speakerphone while meeting with business partners at least 20 times. “Archer described how Joe Biden was put on the phone to sell ‘the brand,’” Archer explained in his testimony.

Archer’s testimony is corroborated by Hunter Biden’s texts and emails. In 2019, a text message from Hunter to his daughter revealed that his father, Joe Biden, takes half of Hunter’s business salary stemming from their work together. This illegally and unethically exploited Biden’s power and position while working as vice president in the Obama administration.

Continue reading “”

It’s not ‘news’ that Tlaib & other demoncraps in Congress are anti-Semitic. What is, is that they’re so open about it now. This is SloJoe’s and the party’s big problem. They’re stuck between a political rock and a hard place

Rashida Tlaib Posts Video Pushing Genocidal Rhetoric against Jews

Representative Rashida Tlaib on Friday posted a video promoting a genocidal message against Jews that calls for a Palestine that stretches “from the river to the sea.”

The video features Tlaib interspersed with clips of large pro-Hamas protests in major U.S. cities, and threatens that Biden will lose support if he does not embrace a cease-fire — which would allow Hamas to go unpunished for carrying out the October 7 massacre and leave over 230 hostages, including Americans, in captivity in Gaza. It would also allow Hamas to make good on its threat to repeat similar massacres over and over again until Israel ceases to exist.

In one part of the video, a crowd is featured chanting “from the river to the sea” — and text appears on screen further emphasizing this message. As I have written previously, this is a call for genocide against Jews:

The issue is that “from the river to the sea” refers to the entire area in between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea — an area that encompasses not just territories captured by Israel in 1967 during the Six-Day War, but the entirety of Israel. Referring to that entire area as “Palestine” is not a call to end the occupation, to create a two-state solution, or even to return Israel to the borders that existed before 1967.

It is a call for the elimination of Israel in its entirety. Israel is home to nearly half of the world’s Jewish population. The only way you can eliminate Israel and turn that whole area into Palestine is by killing millions of Jews.

This is not a random video Tlaib reposted which she could claim to have not fully vetted. It is a video in which she herself appears, and it’s posted under her own account. She is well aware that she is calling for genocide against Jews and doesn’t care.

 

While this is pretty much nothing more than the 7th poking their finger in the eye of SCOTUS, the sooner this gets to there, so we know what the words of the 2nd amendment mean to the courts, and thus to law, the better.

Seventh Circuit Overturns Injunction Against Illinois “Assault Weapons Ban”, Says AR-15s Aren’t Protected Arms

On the face of it, Friday’s decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn an injunction against enforcement of Illinois’ recently enacted ban on “assault weapons” and “large capacity” magazines doesn’t change circumstances on the ground. The three-judge panel that issued today’s decision had previously stayed U.S. District Judge Stephen McGlynn’s injunction while the state appealed, so the law has been in effect throughout litigation.

Still, the 2-1 decision does matter, both because it provides an opportunity for some or all of the plaintiffs to appeal on an emergency basis to the Supreme Court and because it will undoubtedly be cited by other anti-gun judges around the country, including those on the Ninth Circuit panel hearing the appeal of Judge Roger Benitez’s decision striking down California’s ban on “assault weapons.”

I won’t have a chance to do a deep dive into the opinion until this weekend, but one thing immediately stuck out to me as I was giving a quick look-over. The three-judge panel concluded that AR-15s (and presumably semi-automatic rifles in general) are not protected by the Second Amendment because they’re too close to machine guns:

Coming directly to the question whether the weapons and feeding devices covered by the challenged legislation enjoy Second Amendment protection, at the first step of the Bruen analysis, we conclude that the answer is no.

We come to this conclusion because these assault weapons and high-capacity magazines are much more like machineguns and military grade weaponry than they are like the many different types of firearms that are used for individual self-defense (or so the legislature was entitled to conclude). Indeed, the AR-15 is almost the same gun as the M16 machinegun. The only meaningful distinction, as we already have noted, is that the AR-15 has only semiautomatic capability (unless the user takes advantage of some simple modifications that essentially make it fully automatic), while the M16 operates both ways. 

Both weapons share the same core design, and both rely on the same patented operating system.

If the distinction between semi-automatic and select fire is enough to render modern sporting rifles outside the scope of the Second Amendment, according to the Seventh Circuit, then what does that mean for semi-automatic handguns? Are they too close to machine guns to be protected as well? Note this passage from the majority opinion:

The similarity between the AR-15 and the M16 only increases when we take into account how easy it is to modify the AR-15 by adding a “bump stock” (as the shooter in the 2017 Las Vegas event had done) or auto-sear to it, thereby making it, in essence, a fully automatic weapon.

You can (illegally) attach an auto-sear or a switch to many semi-automatic handguns as well. Is the Seventh Circuit suggesting that the most popular make of handguns, undoubtedly in common use for lawful purposes, is also beyond the Second Amendment’s protection?

It sure sounds like it to me, though the panel didn’t have to address that issue since the state hasn’t attempted to ban the majority of semi-automatic pistols, only a subset it deems to be “assault weapons”. This is actually something that gun control activists have been arguing for a couple of years now, both in civil litigation and in lobbying the Biden administration to reclassify many semi-automatic firearms as machine guns under the National Firearms Act.

If the Seventh Circuit’s twisted logic is adopted or allowed to stand by the Supreme Court, not only would the most popular style of rifle be implicated, but the vast majority of handguns that are in the hands of lawful gun owners across the country as well. The 2-1 decision is bad enough, but the long term implications will be even worse unless and until SCOTUS makes it clear that the Seventh Circuit got it wrong.

Why this is even a question is what’s amazing;
“Unrealized” gains – emphasis on the word unrealized –are not ‘income’ since they haven’t been paid or credited.
This is simply the goobermint exercising power over people. They don’t need our money, they print it at leisure. Taxing keeps the people from using for their own purposes.

The stakes are high as Supreme Court considers this obscure, unconstitutional tax

Word games are usually fun. They become less fun, however, when the government uses them to levy unjust and unconstitutional taxes from the citizenry.

The Supreme Court is set to determine whether Congress , for the purposes of taxation, may classify unrealized capital gains as “income.” Should the justices rule in Moore vs. United States rule against the plaintiffs, the federal government effectively would gain seismic new powers to tax almost any property from which it hopes to extract revenue. This would conflict directly with the Constitution ’s plain text and original meaning.

Charles and Kathline Moore, the case’s plaintiffs, have challenged an obscure provision in 2017’s landmark Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This provision created a “mandatory repatriation tax” (MRT), which subjects Americans who own stock in foreign companies to a one-time tax on some of those companies’ earnings over the previous 30 years. Congress classified it as an “income” tax.

The Moores in 2006 purchased a 13% share of an Indian company, KisanKraft, that provides farming equipment to impoverished regions. Since then, they never have received any dividend or other form of compensation or profit from this investment. They have seen no “income.” Nonetheless, they found themselves subjected to the MRT.

“The Moores were … taxed as if KisanKraft … had … distributed to the Moores a dividend worth 13% of KisanKraft’s total earnings since 2006,” the Cato Institute explains in its amicus brief.

Beginning with dictionary definitions, the government’s arguments wilt. “Income has a plain and longstanding meaning: for something to be ‘in-come,’ it must, in some way, ‘come in,’” as the Chamber of Commerce writes. Moreover, early-1900s legal authorities believed “income” necessarily implied realization of gains. Put differently, “income” by nature requires the taxable money to become separated from the capital asset; an asset’s increased value cannot alone suffice. This interpretation corresponds with 19th-century caselaw, discussions surrounding the 16th Amendment’s ratification, contemporaneous state statutes, the Revenue Act of 1913 (which instituted the newly constitutional income tax), and subsequent Supreme Court precedent.

The Framers worried much about abusive federal taxation, and the Constitution originally disallowed Congress to institute any direct tax not apportioned based on state population. The 16th Amendment (ratified in 1913) exempted income taxes from this restriction. Far from a blanket mandate, this amendment’s drafters and ratifiers intended it as a defined carveout to authorize a specific sort of tax.

Only if the Supreme Court adopts the government’s bastardized definition of “income” can the non-apportioned MRT stand.

Further, the MRT required U.S. shareholders to pay tax on foreign companies’ earnings dating back to 1987. Demanded a percentage of 30-year-old earnings (which, to be clear, are better labeled simply as “private property”) resembles more a property tax, taking, or a confiscation than a traditional tax.

Indulging congressional whim by expanding this definition radically (as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did when it ruled against the Moores) greatly increases the federal government’s de facto taxation powers. “Without the guardrails of a realization component, the federal government has unfettered latitude to redefine ‘income’ and redraw the boundaries of its power to tax without apportionment,” the outnumbered Ninth Circuit judge Patrick Bumatay argued in dissent.

Indeed, prominent politicians such as President Joe Biden already have advocated an unrealized capital gains tax; the president’s latest budget proposal featured one on wealth exceeding $100 million. A mistaken Supreme Court decision would feed this effort and far worse ones.

“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined,” James Madison stated in Federalist No. 45.
However, if the Supreme Court in Moore rules that Congress — simply by adopting erroneous interpretations of legally settled terminology — can arrogate to itself vast authorities, an important constitutional guardrail against tyranny would effectively have no force.

The Vigilant Fox 

Peter Andrew McCullough is an American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.

Comparative Risks of Myocarditis and Pericarditis with mRNA, Adenoviral DNA, and Spike Antigen Vaccines
WHO VigiBase Gives Rare Look at Differential Risks

Early in the COVID-19 vaccine campaign people used to ask me “which vaccine is the safest?” Americans have never been given an analysis of comparative safety among the available COVID-19 vaccines. The US military, corporations, schools, and other entities mandating the vaccines never cared which one was taken. There was no interest in determining “the best” COVID-19 vaccine. President Biden infamously said “just get vaccinated.”

The US CDC has pushed the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines because their marketing firm Weber Shandwick has a promotional unit inside the CDC vaccine office in Atlanta. The NIH is the co-owner of the Moderna mRNA patent. The US government is among the top licensees of mRNA patents. This obvious corruption and conflict of interest has misled the country. Among Americans who took a vaccine, 94% received an mRNA vaccine.

Saint-Gerons et al reported on 61,812 cases of myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis in the WHO VigiBase and found all three major classes of vaccines have elevated risks, however the mRNA vaccines consistently are the most risky. However for pericarditis alone, the Spike protein antigen vaccine from Novavax had the largest point-estimate. Because of the small numbers, the measures of central tendency are a statistical blur and we must rely to a greater degree on confidence intervals. There were 61 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis with Novavax and none were fatal. While overall Novavax is probably the safest vaccine, I can tell you as a cardiologist, cardiac risks are too high for any heart specialist to recommend COVID-19 vaccination.

Continue reading “”

Anti-Semitism and the Quran

Many Americans have been led to believe the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a conflict over land when it is a religious conflict rooted in Quranic doctrine; a doctrine consumed with Jew hatred throughout its numerous passages.

The formation of Islam began with Mohammad in 610 A.D. in the city of Mecca where he attempted to convince the local pagan population he was sent by God to be his messenger.  During his time in Mecca his messages were relatively peaceful as demonstrated in the following verses:

“You cannot guide those you would like to but God guides those He wills.  He has the best knowledge of the guided.” (Quran/28:56); “God does not forbid you from being good to those who have not fought you in the religion or driven you from your homes, or from being just towards them.  God loves those who are just.” (Surat al-Mumtahana,8);

Nevertheless, his messages were received with resentment by a population of idol worshippers.  He and a few of his followers were driven out of town and forced to flee to Medina where he gained a following with the aid of the three residing Jewish tribes (the Qurayzah) who falsely assumed their financial aid given to him would protect them from the fate meted out to others.

Mohammed’s attempts to mollify the Medina Jews resulted in a series of conciliatory passages that contradict the vast majority of Quranic references to Jews: “O children of Israel! call to mind My favor which I bestowed on you and that I made you excel the nations.” (Muslims try to explain away these through the Doctrine of Abrogation, which nullifies certain passages in the “perfect” Quran, something not required by either the Old or New Testaments.)

In fact, while in Medina, Mohammad and his followers were reported to have pillaged villages while raping and capturing the women to be used as sex slaves, and although the three Jewish tribes feared him, they continued to cling to their Judaism.  As a result, in 627, a mere five years after Muhammad arrived in Medina, he oversaw the beheading of approximately 900 Jewish men in the marketplace on trumped-up charges of conspiring with the enemy.  The captured Jewish women became sex slaves, and their children were taken into slavery.

Thus, it is worth noting, the refusal of Jews some 1400 years ago to accept Mohammad as a prophet has enshrined Islam with contempt and Jew hatred for all of eternity. The Quran stipulates that Jews were rebellious disbelievers to the teachings of Allah and that they sinned against him.  It can be found in the following passage:

“Those among the children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed.  That was because they disobeyed Allah and the Messengers and were transgressing beyond bounds.” Quran 5:78-82

Throughout the Quran Jews are depicted as inveterately evil and bent on destroying the wellbeing of all Muslims.

“They are the strongest of all people in enmity toward the Muslims” (5:82) “They fabricate things and falsely ascribe them to Allah” (2:79; 3:75, 3:181) “They disobey Allah and never observe his commands” (5:13) “Hiding the truth and misleading people” (3:78); “Staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their guidance” (2:55); “Giving preference to their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad” (2:87).

The most hostile passage can be found in the sayings of Mohammad referred to as the “Hadith.”  In Bukhari Volume 4 Book 52, Number 176 Allah’s Apostle said “You Muslims will fight the Jews till some of them hide behind stones. The stones will betray them saying ‘Oh Abdullah (slave of Allah)!  There is a Jew hiding behind me; so, kill him.”  This passage often cited by Jihadists in their quest to annihilate the Jews.

Christians too are negated for worshipping a false messiah, Jesus, “Quran (8:39) — “And fight with them until there is no more fitnah (disorder, unbelief) and religion is all for Allah.” But Jews are to be loathed and slaughtered.  They are referred to as apes and pigs, disbelievers, cowards, liars, and they are set up as a target who can run and hide but cannot avoid the sword of the Islamic warrior.

Continue reading “”

Maintenance man, gunman shot after victim fights back during attempted robbery in Waukegan

A maintenance man was shot during an attempted robbery and fought back against the gunman, resulting in the suspect being shot with his own gun, in Waukegan Tuesday.

The Waukegan Police Department and Waukegan Fire Department responded around 10:45 a.m. Tuesday to Beechwood at the Preserve Apartments in the 3000 block of 8th Street for a report of a shooting.

Officers arrived and learned two people had sustained gunshot wounds.

A 17-year-old boy was found in an apartment with a gunshot wound to his thigh, according to a police report.

An officer applied a tourniquet to the boy’s leg before paramedics arrived.

The second person, a 20-year-old man working maintenance for the apartment building, was found with a gunshot wound to his thigh, the report said.

He was found on the ground by a dumpster behind the apartment building.

An officer provided first aid to the victim before paramedics arrived.

The 20-year-old man told officers that the 17-year-old boy attempted to rob him with a pistol and he fought back, the report said.

The maintenance man was able to gain control of the gun and shot the suspect.

The report said a witness also told investigators the 17-year-old boy was trying to rob the 20-year-old man and the two struggled over the weapon, resulting in the shooting.

Paramedics transported both male subjects to the hospital for treatment.

Officers recovered a gun from the area where the incident occurred and ammunition.

A second gun was recovered from the apartment where the suspect resides.

The incident remains under investigation by the Waukegan Police Department.

November 4

1429 – During the 3rd phase of the Hundred Years War, French forces lead by Jean of Arc liberates the city of Saint-Pierre-le-Moûtier from Elglish occupation.

1493 – Christopher Columbus reaches the Leeward Islands and Puerto Rico on his second voyage.

1677 – The future Mary II of England marries William, Prince of Orange, later jointly reigning as William and Mary.

1780 – Aymara and Quechua indians, led by Túpac Amaru II revolt against Spanish rule in Peru.

1783 – Wolfgang Mozart’s Symphony No. 36 is performed for the first time in Linz, Austria.

1791 – The Western Confederacy of American Indians, led by Chiefs Little Turtle of the Miami, Blue Jacket of the Shawnee, and Buckongahelas of the Delaware, wins a major victory over U.S forces led by General Arthur St. Clair, in the Battle of the Wabash, near Fort Recovery, Ohio

1847 – Sir James Young Simpson, a Scottish physician, discovers the anesthetic properties of chloroform.

1864 – Confederate troops bombard a Union supply base at Johnsonville, Tennessee, destroying millions of dollars of war materiel.

1918 – During World War I, Italy and Austria-Hungary sign an armistice.

1922 –British archaeologist Howard Carter and his men find the entrance to Pharaoh Tutankhamun’s tomb in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt

1924 – Nellie Tayloe Ross of Wyoming becomes the first female elected as governor in the United States.

1939 – President Roosevelt orders the United States Customs Service to implement the Neutrality Act of 1939, allowing cash and carry purchases of weapons by belligerents.

1942 – During the Africa campaign of World War II: General Field Marshal Erwin Rommel disobeys a direct order by Adolf Hitler and begins a retreat of his forces after being defeated at El Alamein.

1952 – The United States government establishes the National Security Agency, or NSA.

1962 – The United States concludes Operation Fishbowl, its final above-ground series of high-altitude nuclear weapons tests, before the 1963 Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty goes into effect

1979 – A group of purported Iranian college students overruns the U.S. embassy in Tehran and take 90 hostages.

1980 – Ronald Reagan is elected the 40th President of The United States

1995 – Israel prime minister Yitzhak Rabin is assassinated by an extremist Israeli.

2008 – Barack Hussein Obama is elected the 44th President of the United States.

An America Without Gun Rights Would Look Like Mexico, Not Australia

Every mass shooting inevitably leads those on the left to call for a ban on “assault weapons,” and this time is no different. Thus begins the barrage of calls for “sensible gun laws” on social media, from network pundits, and via Vice President Kamala Harris herself, using Australia or New Zealand as the models. These unarmed countries, they tell us, prove you can strip citizens of their ability to own firearms and live in a nonviolent utopia. Is that the likely outcome of such a ban in America?

Thought experiment, leaving aside the issue of a right enshrined in the Constitution: If Americans allow their firearms to be outlawed and then confiscated, would we in fact, become like Australia or New Zealand?

If we gave up AR-15s and then a mass shooting took place where a semi-automatic handgun was used, opponents of gun rights would take those too — the same with a shooter with a hunting rifle, then a shooter with a shotgun, and on and on. We know where this leads. It can’t end with “military style” firearms. A confiscation of AR-15s would eventually lead to a complete ban on almost every gun. How long would that take? Five years, 10 years? It wouldn’t take very long once the ball is rolling and mass shooters move to handguns and shotguns, which would quickly be banned as the public’s demand for “safety” would be too much for politicians to stand against.

Cut to a Republican senator being interviewed on CNN the day after a mass shooting where a 9mm handgun was used: Senator, just a few months ago you voted to ban AR-15s because scores of children were killed in a school shooting. Today, with more dead children, you won’t support the banning of semi-automatic handguns? How can you tell those parents why the shooter was able to legally obtain a Glock 19 that, like the AR-15s that you voted to ban, allowed the shooter to fire many rounds and reload in a matter of seconds? What’s the difference, senator? Do those dead children think it was better to be shot by a handgun rather than a long gun? Senator?

That lawmaker would crumble, and so would others. What would we be left with? A technical right to keep and bear arms that practically renders that right meaningless.

How do we know this? We know this because we have seen this before in Mexico.

Continue reading “”

FLPD investigating home invasion; 1 suspect shot, 1 still at large

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA. (WSVN) – Fort Lauderdale Police are investigating following reports that multiple suspects forcibly entered a home and physically assaulted a man inside.

According to authorities, the incident occurred just before 12:30 p.m. at the Progreso Point Apartments, located at 619 North Andrews Avenue.

Police said once the unknown suspects entered the home, in an act of self-defense, the victim managed to retrieve a firearm and shoot one of the intruders.

Before the police could arrive at the scene, the suspects fled the area in an unknown vehicle. The victim sustained serious injuries during the attack and was transported to Broward Health Medical Center.

Shortly after, the injured suspect, along with another suspect, arrived at BHMC for medical treatment, with the latter driving the vehicle.

FLPD officers on-site took both suspects into custody. The injured suspect is currently receiving treatment for serious injuries.

However, one suspect remains at large, and police are actively working to locate and apprehend them.

Police said the incident was isolated and not related to an active shooter situation at any point.

That’s because they’re really not ‘Pro-Israel’.

Here We Go: ‘Pro-Israel’ Democrats Start to Waffle on Israel’s Self Defense

In the immediate aftermath of the hell on earth visited upon Israeli civilians by Iran-backed Hamas terrorists, most Democrats in Washington — aside from the predictable fanatical Israel haters and bigots — talked a strong game about Israel’s right to self defense.  Many of us warned that although such statements of solidarity were nice, the real test would lie in the days and weeks ahead.  Once the initial shock of the massacre wore off, and Israel’s military was grinding through a brutal war to destroy Hamas, how long would the support truly last?  Here we are, less than four weeks past the single largest one-day mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust, and the President of the United States is calling for a temporary “pause” in the IDF’s offensive, supposedly for ‘humanitarian’ reasons.  Not only that, he’s threatening to veto crucial military aid to Israel if it’s not paired with money for Ukraine:

I personally support helping both of these allies in their fights for survival against anti-American enemies, but this is not a time to play games.

Continue reading “”