The point being earlier made:
This is ‘for now’. We’ll see what happens the next time a virulenty anti RKBA administration is in power.
Comment O’ The Day:
2 things can be true. I can take @ATFDirectorRC at his word, but I can also 100% believe that there are still anti-gun elements within the ATF that are keeping their powder dry, waiting for shift change. We only need the Adamiak case as evidence.
Robert Cekada, current ATF director
UPDATE>Jensen v. ATF
FACTS> CLICKBAIT.
There’s a lot of misinformation circulating about the recent NDTX ruling in Jensen v. ATF; including a headline claiming, “ATF is Furious and We Are Planning Brutal Revenge on Gun Owners.”
The source? You guessed it: unnamed anonymous sources. It’s completely FALSE.
**More importantly – ATF respects the Court’s ruling and the rule of law. We are following the order and will not take enforcement action against protected parties inconsistent with that ruling. We are working diligently on clear guidance. Getting it RIGHT matters more than getting it out fast.
That means carefully navigating federal and state laws so that manufacturers, FFLs, and law-abiding gun owners aren’t left with legal problems – today or under a future administration.
Thank you for your patience as we focus on developing the guidance. It will be posted online as soon as we are done. The American public and the 2A community deserve facts NOT clickbait.